A Randomized Study to Abate Truancy and Violence in Grades 3-9 in Chicago Public Schools

NCT ID: NCT01487434

Last Updated: 2020-09-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

5300 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-09-30

Study Completion Date

2020-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In partnership with the Chicago Public Schools (CPS), the goal of this project is to test the effectiveness of a manualized mentoring and case management program for students in grades 1-8. Most of the current policy and research attention on dropout has focused on the dropout decision itself, even though dropout is more likely to be simply the end point of a longer-term developmental process. This project seeks to learn more about the relative effectiveness of preventing dropout through mentoring and case management programs, and to learn more about the relative effectiveness of intervening early vs. later.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

High school graduation is tremendously protective against involvement with crime and violence, as well as against the risk of adult poverty, unemployment, and poor health. Most of the policy and research attention on dropout has focused on the dropout decision itself. Yet dropout is almost always the end point of a longer-term developmental process. For this project the investigators have raised nearly $7 million in external support from the U.S. Department of Education, the National Institutes of Health, and the William T. Grant Foundation to learn more about the relative effectiveness of preventing dropout by trying to re-engage children in school much earlier during their academic careers.

Specifically, this project is motivated by findings from the late University of Chicago sociologist James Coleman indicating that one of the strongest protective factors against school failure for children is having a strong relationship with a pro-social adult - something that far too many children do not currently have, particularly those growing up in distressed family and community environments. The investigators are partnering with other researchers at Northwestern, Duke, and the University of Minnesota to test at large scale the effects of a structured mentoring and monitoring programs called Check \& Connect. To date, the project has completed its pilot year, and starting this academic year will work with nearly 500 elementary and middle school students distributed across 23 CPS schools on the West and South sides of the city. Students will receive Check \& Connect assistance for two academic years total.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Attendance and Truancy Student Engagement Dropout

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Check & Connect

Check and Connect Structured Mentoring and Case Management

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Check & Connect

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Structured mentoring and case management

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Check & Connect

Structured mentoring and case management

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Student with 10-27 total absences in prior school year
* Students in Grades 1-7 at start of 2011-2012 or 2013-14 school years
* In attendance at one of the Chicago Public Schools elementary/middle schools randomly selected to be offered the intervention

Exclusion Criteria

* None
Minimum Eligible Age

5 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

16 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

U.S. Department of Education

FED

Sponsor Role collaborator

William T. Grant Foundation

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Northwestern University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jonathan Guryan

Associate Professor of Human Development and Social Policy

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jonathan Guryan, Ph.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Northwestern University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Chicago Public Schools

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Allensworth, E. M. & John Q. Easton (2007). "What Matters for Staying On-Track and Graduating in Chicago Public High Schools." Chicago, Consortium on Chicago School Research.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Christenson, S.L, Sinclair M.F., Evelo D.L., and C.M. Hurley (1998) "Promoting school engagement with school using the Check & Connect model." Australian Journal of Guidance & Counseling, 9(1): 169-184.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Jacob, Brian and Jens Ludwig. (2009). "Improving Educational Outcomes for Poor Children." In Changing Poverty, Changing Policies, edited by Maria Cancian and Sheldon Danziger. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Sinclair, M.F., Christenson, S.L., Evelo D. L., and C.M. Hurley (1998). "Dropout prevention for youth with disabilities: Efficacy of a sustained school engagement procedure." Exceptional Children, 65(1): 7-21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Sinclair, M. F., Christenson, S. L. and M. L. Thurlow. (2005). "Promoting school completion of urban secondary youth with emotional and behavioral disabilities." Exceptional Children, 71(4): 465-482.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

R01HD067500

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

R305A100706

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

180140

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

STU00035771

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Intervening Early With Neglected Children
NCT02093052 UNKNOWN PHASE1/PHASE2
Recovery Legal Care Clinical Trial
NCT06618794 RECRUITING NA
Pathways 2 Success
NCT06831123 RECRUITING PHASE1/PHASE2
Family Health and Development Project
NCT01567969 COMPLETED PHASE3