Using Implementation Intentions to Reduce Anger and Aggression in Adolescence

NCT ID: NCT03693209

Last Updated: 2020-11-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-10-16

Study Completion Date

2019-06-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will test whether making plans of action for situations that trigger anger is effective in reducing anger and aggression in adolescents with behavioural problems.

Participants will be assigned to three groups: a control group and two experimental groups. Participants assigned to the experimental groups will receive either one general anger trigger or a list of specific anger triggers in addition to a list of strategies that can be used to manage anger. Participants will be instructed to link the triggers with the strategies, thus creating action plans with an if-then structure. Participants assigned to the control group will receive the same lists. However, they will receive different instructions which will ask them to select separately the most encountered triggers and the most useful strategies.

It is expected that making plans will reduce the anger and aggression of participants. It is also expected that the reduction will be larger for participants with low violent intentions, low callous-unemotional traits and low impulsivity.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study aims to test whether aggression in adolescents can be reduced using implementation intentions. This technique involves identifying critical situations that might trigger the unwanted behaviour and making a plan to engage in an alternative course of action when those triggers are present. Implementation intentions formation has been found to be effective in reducing smoking uptake and consultations for emergency contraception in this age group.

A randomised controlled trial will be conducted. Students from 11 to 17 years old attending special schools for children with behavioural problems or referred for anger issues will be randomised to three conditions: attention control, specific triggers and general trigger. Participants in the attention control and specific triggers conditions will receive the same Volitional Help Sheet (VHS), composed of a list of 10 anger triggers (if statements) and a list of 10 anger management strategies (then statements). However, the instructions will be different. Participants in the attention control condition will be instructed to select the triggers that they encounter more often and the strategies that they consider more useful. In contrast, participants in the specific triggers condition will have to link each specific trigger that they encounter often with a specific strategy, thus creating action plans with an if-then structure. Participants assigned to the general trigger condition will also be instructed to make plans linking the trigger with a strategy, but the VHS they will receive will contain only one general trigger: "If I am getting angry".

Measures of anger and reactive physical aggression, reactive relational aggression, proactive physical aggression and proactive relation aggression will be collected at baseline, one month and six months after intervention. In addition, measures of negative urgency, violent intentions and callous-unemotional traits will be collected once.

Both intervention groups are hypothesised to reduce anger and reactive aggression in comparison to the control group. It is hypothesised that the reduction in anger acts as a mediator for the reduction of reactive aggression. It is also hypothesised that violent intentions, callous-unemotional traits and negative urgency act as moderators of effectiveness.

The effects of the intervention will be analysed on anger, on the aggression total score and on the four types of aggression separately using Multivariate Analysis of Covariance. In order to test whether the effect of the interventions on reactive aggression at follow-up is mediated by anger, a mediation analysis will be conducted using the PROCESS macro (Hayes, 2013). In the analysis, the intervention conditions (dummy coded) will be entered as the independent variable, anger as the mediator variable, reactive aggression at follow-up as the dependent variable, and reactive aggression at baseline as the covariate. The analysis will asses the strength of the direct and indirect effects of the interventions on reactive aggression via anger. In order to test whether the effect of the interventions on aggression at follow-up is moderated by violent intentions, callous-unemotional traits and negative urgency, a moderated regression analysis will be conducted using the PROCESS macro (Hayes, 2013). In the analysis, the intervention conditions (dummy coded) will be entered as the independent variable, violent intentions, callous-unemotional traits and negative urgency as the moderator variables, aggression at follow-up as the dependent variable, and aggression at baseline as covariates.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Aggression Anger

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Implementation intentions Volitional Help Sheet Adolescent

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

There will be one control group and two intervention groups. Each group will be independently be compared with the others, and not in combination.
Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors
The control condition is active and has a similar format to the intervention conditions to avoid participants knowing which condition they have been assigned to. Outcomes are assessed by self-report.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

General trigger

VHS with one general trigger: "If I am getting angry..." and 10 strategies (e.g. "Then I will take deep breaths"). Participants are instructed to link trigger with strategies.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Volitional Help Sheet (VHS)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

VHS with a general anger trigger and 10 anger management strategies

Specific triggers

VHS with a list of 10 specific situations that can act as anger triggers (e.g. "If I am getting angry when people act like they know it all") and 10 strategies. Participants are instructed to link triggers with strategies.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Volitional Help Sheet (VHS)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

VHS with 10 specific anger triggers and 10 anger management strategies

Control

List of 10 specific situations that can act as anger triggers and 10 strategies. Participants are instructed to select most encountered triggers and most useful strategies.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Volitional Help Sheet (VHS)

VHS with a general anger trigger and 10 anger management strategies

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Volitional Help Sheet (VHS)

VHS with 10 specific anger triggers and 10 anger management strategies

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

implementation intentions, action-planning implementation intentions, action-planning

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Attending a school for children with Social, Emotional and Mental Health needs.
* Being referred by school staff due to anger issues or behavioural problems.

Exclusion Criteria

* Having severe or profound learning disabilities.
Minimum Eligible Age

10 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

17 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Manchester

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Sheffield

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Laura Castillo Eito

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Laura Castillo-Eito, Msc

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Sheffield

Christopher J Armitage, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

University of Manchester

Paul Norman, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

University of Sheffield

Richard Rowe, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

University of Sheffield

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Schools for children with Social Emotional and Mental Health needs.

Leeds, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Schools for children with Social Emotional and Mental Health needs.

Sheffield, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Secondary schools

Sheffield, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Scott BG, Lapre GE, Marsee MA, Weems CF. Aggressive behavior and its associations with posttraumatic stress and academic achievement following a natural disaster. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2014;43(1):43-50. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2013.807733. Epub 2013 Jun 24.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23795776 (View on PubMed)

Marsee MA., Kimonis ER., Frick PJ. Peer conflict scale. Unpublished rating scale, University of New Orleans, 2004.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Novaco RW. Dimensions of Anger Reactions. Irvine, CA: University of California; 1975.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

017275

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id