Effects of Cannabis/Alcohol on Driving Performance and Field Sobriety Tests
NCT ID: NCT05273658
Last Updated: 2023-09-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
PHASE1/PHASE2
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-08-31
2023-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Impact and Detection of Driving Impairments Associated With Acute Cannabis Smoking
NCT02849587
Effects of THC and Alcohol on Driving Performance
NCT03555968
Examine the Feasibility of a Standardized Field Test for Marijuana and Alcohol Impairment: Laboratory Evaluations
NCT04856566
Effects of Inhaled Cannabis on Driving Performance
NCT01620177
Marijuana Effects on Simulated Driving Performance
NCT03699540
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Despite a vast literature documenting impaired driving behavior due to alcohol consumption, much less is known regarding driving under the influence of cannabis, and even less about how the combination of alcohol and cannabis may affect driving behavior. This study will examine whether either, or both, conditions significantly impact performance in a driving simulator, on cognitive measures, and during the comprehensive Drug Recognition Expert evaluations (which includes SFSTs, as well as additional measures).
Alcohol studies. Higher blood alcohol levels (BACs) have been consistently related to impaired driving. BACs greater than .08% have been associated with 5.5 times higher crash risk compared to those without alcohol or drugs. In terms of detecting alcohol-related impairment, SFSTs have consistently been shown to be predictors of a blood alcohol concentration of .08%.
Cannabis studies. Several studies suggest higher doses of whole-blood or plasma delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) concentration are associated with increased crash risk and crash culpability. However, attempts to define a cut-off point for blood THC levels have proven to be challenging. Unlike alcohol, for which a level can be reasonably measured using a breathalyzer (and confirmed with a blood test), detection of a cut-off point for intoxication related to THC concentration has eluded scientific verification. Most recently, we did not find any correlation between blood THC concentrations and driving performance. To date, the relationship between SFSTs and cannabis use/impairment have been mixed across studies.
Cannabis and Alcohol. There have been a limited number of studies examining the combination of cannabis and alcohol on driving and/or field sobriety test performance.
With respect to subjective effects, alcohol has been found to potentiate the duration of the cannabis effects, with subjective effects being longer in the cannabis-alcohol combinations compared to either drug alone. Participants also reported more effects after alcohol and cannabis were combined, compared to alcohol alone. Another study found that alcohol pre-treatment decreased the latency to the cannabis effects, and increased the duration of the effects. It has also been hypothesized that frequent cannabis users may develop cross-tolerance to the effects of alcohol.
Some studies have found SFSTs to be only mildly sensitive to cannabis effects in heavy cannabis users, but sensitive to doses of alcohol.
There have also been suggestions that the concurrent presence of cannabis and alcohol may result in increased THC and 11-Hydroxy-Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (11-OH-THC) levels, possibly by affecting initial absorption (resulting in higher concentrations immediately post-inhalation; the overall area under the curve (AUC) does not differ based upon alcohol ingestion), although the possible mechanisms for this - such as increased cardiac output facilitating absorption via increased pulmonary capillary flow, or less cannabis self-titration after alcohol intake - are as yet unresolved.
Research Design
One-hundred twenty-five healthy volunteers will be randomized into one of 5 conditions; those who receive 1) low dose alcohol and placebo cannabis, 2) low dose alcohol and THC, 3) high dose alcohol and placebo cannabis, 4) placebo alcohol and THC, and 5) double placebo.
Cannabis, acquired from the National Institute on Drug Abuse Drug Supply Program, will be inhaled ad libitum and/or ingested alcohol will take place at the beginning of the day followed by the completion of driving simulations, components of the Drug Recognition Expert (DRE) evaluations, and bodily fluid draws (e.g., blood, oral fluid \[OF\] saliva, breath) over the subsequent 4 hours after ingestion.
Driving simulations will be conducted using a 3-monitor, fully-interactive STISIM (Systems Technology Inc. Simulator) console system. The simulations will be similar to those used in our recently completed study of 191 cannabis users.
Drug Recognition Expert (DRE) evaluations will be conducted by DREs, and will consist of 1) Preliminary Examination and First Pulse; 2) Eye Examinations: Horizontal gaze nystagmus (HGN); Vertical gaze nystagmus (VGN); Lack of convergence (LOC); 3) Divided Attention Psychophysical Tests: Modified Romberg balance; Walk and turn; One leg stand; Finger to nose; 4) Vital Signs and Second Pulse (Blood pressure, temperature, pulse); 5) Dark Room Examinations (pupillometer): Assess for dilation or constriction; pupillary response to light; 6) Examination for Muscle Tone; 7) Third Pulse.
Cannabinoids levels in blood, oral fluid, and breath will be determined via liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS).
The results of this study will further advance the understanding of the impact of acute cannabis and alcohol administration on driving performance, as well as the best methods for detecting driving under the influence of these substances.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SCREENING
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Placebo
Placebo cannabis and placebo alcohol
Cannabis
Participants will smoke a cannabis cigarette ad libitum as per their usual routine
Alcohol
Participants will ingest alcohol to achieve the target breath alcohol level
Cannabis, No alcohol
18.16% THC, placebo alcohol
Cannabis
Participants will smoke a cannabis cigarette ad libitum as per their usual routine
Alcohol
Participants will ingest alcohol to achieve the target breath alcohol level
Cannabis, Low dose alcohol
18.16% THC, .07 breath alcohol concentration
Cannabis
Participants will smoke a cannabis cigarette ad libitum as per their usual routine
Alcohol
Participants will ingest alcohol to achieve the target breath alcohol level
Placebo cannabis, High dose alcohol
\<.1% THC, .10 Breath alcohol concentration
Cannabis
Participants will smoke a cannabis cigarette ad libitum as per their usual routine
Alcohol
Participants will ingest alcohol to achieve the target breath alcohol level
Placebo cannabis, Low dose alcohol
\<.1% THC, .07 breath alcohol concentration
Cannabis
Participants will smoke a cannabis cigarette ad libitum as per their usual routine
Alcohol
Participants will ingest alcohol to achieve the target breath alcohol level
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Cannabis
Participants will smoke a cannabis cigarette ad libitum as per their usual routine
Alcohol
Participants will ingest alcohol to achieve the target breath alcohol level
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Must be a licensed driver and driven a minimum of 1,000 miles in the past year
* Experience with cannabis and alcohol
Exclusion Criteria
* Unwillingness to abstain from cannabis for 2 days prior to screening and experimental visits
* Positive pregnancy test
* A positive result on toxicity screening for cocaine, amphetamines, opiates, and phencyclidine (PCP) will exclude individuals from participation.
* Unwilling to refrain from driving or operating heavy machinery after consuming study medication.
21 Years
55 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of California, San Diego
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Thomas D. Marcotte, PhD
Professor
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Movig KL, Mathijssen MP, Nagel PH, van Egmond T, de Gier JJ, Leufkens HG, Egberts AC. Psychoactive substance use and the risk of motor vehicle accidents. Accid Anal Prev. 2004 Jul;36(4):631-6. doi: 10.1016/S0001-4575(03)00084-8.
Stuster J. Validation of the standardized field sobriety test battery at 0.08% blood alcohol concentration. Hum Factors. 2006 Fall;48(3):608-14. doi: 10.1518/001872006778606895.
Grotenhermen F, Leson G, Berghaus G, Drummer OH, Kruger HP, Longo M, Moskowitz H, Perrine B, Ramaekers JG, Smiley A, Tunbridge R. Developing limits for driving under cannabis. Addiction. 2007 Dec;102(12):1910-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.02009.x. Epub 2007 Oct 4.
Hartman RL, Brown TL, Milavetz G, Spurgin A, Gorelick DA, Gaffney G, Huestis MA. Controlled vaporized cannabis, with and without alcohol: subjective effects and oral fluid-blood cannabinoid relationships. Drug Test Anal. 2016 Jul;8(7):690-701. doi: 10.1002/dta.1839. Epub 2015 Aug 10.
Ramaekers JG, Theunissen EL, de Brouwer M, Toennes SW, Moeller MR, Kauert G. Tolerance and cross-tolerance to neurocognitive effects of THC and alcohol in heavy cannabis users. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2011 Mar;214(2):391-401. doi: 10.1007/s00213-010-2042-1. Epub 2010 Oct 30.
Hartman RL, Brown TL, Milavetz G, Spurgin A, Pierce RS, Gorelick DA, Gaffney G, Huestis MA. Cannabis effects on driving lateral control with and without alcohol. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015 Sep 1;154:25-37. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.06.015. Epub 2015 Jun 23.
Hoffman MA, Hubbard JA, Sobolesky PM, Smith BE, Suhandynata RT, Sanford S, Sones EG, Ellis S, Umlauf A, Huestis MA, Grelotti DJ, Grant I, Marcotte TD, Fitzgerald RL. Blood and Oral Fluid Cannabinoid Profiles of Frequent and Occasional Cannabis Smokers. J Anal Toxicol. 2021 Sep 17;45(8):851-862. doi: 10.1093/jat/bkab078.
Hubbard JA, Smith BE, Sobolesky PM, Kim S, Hoffman MA, Stone J, Huestis MA, Grelotti DJ, Grant I, Marcotte TD, Fitzgerald RL. Validation of a liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method to detect cannabinoids in whole blood and breath. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020 Apr 28;58(5):673-681. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2019-0600.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
192048
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.