Evaluating Perceived Fitness to Drive While Intoxicated
NCT ID: NCT05028413
Last Updated: 2024-10-01
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
22 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-05-08
2017-06-23
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Smartphone-paired Breathalyzers and Loss- and Gain-framed Texts for Reducing Drinking and Driving
NCT03335735
Multi-Component Breath Alcohol Intervention
NCT06124898
Breathalyzer Validation Study
NCT04086576
Smartphone Technology: Young Adult Drinking
NCT02963818
Remote Monitoring and Contingency Management Reinforcement for Alcohol Abstinence
NCT01307345
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Participants Blinded to BrAC reading (Control)
Participants randomized to this arm will consume three weight-based doses of alcohol with a target BAC of 0.10 and comple breathalyzer measurements every 20 minutes until a BAC of 0.03 is reached. They will complete a visual analog scale (the Self-Reported intoxication Survey) on their perceived fitness to drive and be blinded to their breath alcohol readings with the BACtrack Mobile Pro device.
No interventions assigned to this group
Participants Aware of their BrAC reading
Participants randomized to this arm will consume three weight-based doses of alcohol with a target BAC of 0.10 and comple breathalyzer measurements every 20 minutes until a BAC of 0.03 is reached. They will be shown their breath alcohol readings with the BACtrack Mobile Pro device before completing a visual analog scale (the Self-Reported intoxication Survey) on their perceived fitness to drive.
Participants Shown their Breath Alcohol Content Measurement
Each time a Breath Alcohol Content (BrAC) Measurement is taken by the research team, the participant is shown the measurement before completing the paper visual analog scale scale (the Self-Reported intoxication Survey) on their perceived fitness to drive.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Participants Shown their Breath Alcohol Content Measurement
Each time a Breath Alcohol Content (BrAC) Measurement is taken by the research team, the participant is shown the measurement before completing the paper visual analog scale scale (the Self-Reported intoxication Survey) on their perceived fitness to drive.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Less than 4 drinking days and less than 12 drinks per week on average in the past 2 months,
* Have consumed at least 4 (women) or 5 (men) drinks on one occasion, in the past year without experiencing adverse effects
* Have a valid photo ID
* Willing and able to use a rideshare credit or septa token as transportation home from the study visit
* Drives at least 2 days per week on average.
Exclusion Criteria
* Have Alcohol use disorder per DSM-V criteria
* Meet or have met criteria for a substance use disorder within the past 12 months per DSM V criteria
* Have a prior psychiatric condition requiring hospitalization
* Are non-English-speaking
* Individuals who have a medical condition or who are taking medication which limits or prevents the consumption of alcohol
* Are experiencing suicidal ideation
21 Years
39 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Pennsylvania
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
M. Kit Delgado, MD
Assistant Professor of Emergency Medicine and Epidemiology
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Harrison EL, Marczinski CA, Fillmore MT. Driver training conditions affect sensitivity to the impairing effects of alcohol on a simulated driving test [corrected]. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2007 Dec;15(6):588-98. doi: 10.1037/1064-1297.15.6.588.
Harrison EL, Fillmore MT. Are bad drivers more impaired by alcohol? Sober driving precision predicts impairment from alcohol in a simulated driving task. Accid Anal Prev. 2005 Sep;37(5):882-9. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2005.04.005.
Marczinski CA, Stamates AL. Artificial sweeteners versus regular mixers increase breath alcohol concentrations in male and female social drinkers. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2013 Apr;37(4):696-702. doi: 10.1111/acer.12039. Epub 2012 Dec 6.
McCarthy DM, Niculete ME, Treloar HR, Morris DH, Bartholow BD. Acute alcohol effects on impulsivity: associations with drinking and driving behavior. Addiction. 2012 Dec;107(12):2109-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2012.03974.x. Epub 2012 Aug 10.
Patton JH, Stanford MS, Barratt ES. Factor structure of the Barratt impulsiveness scale. J Clin Psychol. 1995 Nov;51(6):768-74. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(199511)51:63.0.co;2-1.
Senecal N, Wang T, Thompson E, Kable JW. Normative arguments from experts and peers reduce delay discounting. Judgm Decis Mak. 2012 Sep 1;7(5):568-589.
Ebert JP, Kranzler HR, Barnett IJ, Hemmons JE, Yan R, Spencer E, Delgado MK. Effect of smartphone breathalyzer feedback on willingness to drive in moderately intoxicated individuals: A randomized trial. Psychol Addict Behav. 2025 Aug 14:10.1037/adb0001088. doi: 10.1037/adb0001088. Online ahead of print.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
BacTrack Mobile Smartphone Paired Breathalyzer
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
827284
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.