Use of Neurostimulation As a Tool for Reconditioning the Neuromuscular System of Patients Admitted to the ICU for Septic Shock

NCT ID: NCT05257759

Last Updated: 2025-02-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

8 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-03-25

Study Completion Date

2024-06-11

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Patients hospitalized in the ICU are likely to develop sarcopenia due to a progressive and generalized decrease in muscle mass that is responsible for generalized muscle weakness known as resuscitation neuromyopathy. This neuromyopathy is known make weaning from mechanical ventilation more difficult, which prolongs the hospitalization of patients in the ICU and in hospital. The factors identified as being partly responsible for this neuromyopathy are: immobilization, undernutrition, prolonged duration of mechanical ventilation, inflammation (notably secondary to sepsis), and multivisceral failure. These factors are essentially found in patients in septic shock, which represents about 20% of patients admitted to the ICU, with a mortality rate close to 50%. If the management of septic shock is now well codified (i.e. vascular filling, antibiotics and/or treatment of the infectious focus by surgery +/- organ replacement therapy) as well as the early rehabilitation of ICU patients, no treatments has yet been proven to be effective in limiting the appearance of resuscitation neuromyopathy. For the last ten years, research using electrostimulation (ES) to improve muscle contraction seems to give encouraging results, both for length of hospital stay and the duration of mechanical ventilation, notably through the preservation or a significant increase in muscle strength. On the other hand, other studies did not show a significant effect on muscle strength. These conflicting results are partly related to the heterogeneity of the populations included in the studies and to the different ES approaches used to assess and recondition motor function.

In the present STIMUREA study, an original approach is proposed based on experimental research work carried out for many years within U1093 (Pr Charalambos Papaxanthis) which focuses on ES, not of the muscle surface as in most studies carried out in the ICU, but an approach based on ES of the motor nerve. Indeed, the intensity of ES used in previous studies was based on a maximum tolerated intensity leading to a direct recruitment of the most fatiguable motor units (via the activation of motor axons) but leading, in fine, to a decrease in muscle strength. The U1093 research team and previous studies have shown that protocols using high stimulation frequencies (100Hz) associated with pulse widths of 1ms and delivered at low intensities (5-10% of the maximum voluntary contraction, MVC) at the level of the motor nerve, could increase the force developed during the contraction, while decreasing the discomfort induced by the high intensities. This increase in force would be due to the indirect activation of motor neurons via large diameter sensory afferents, thus leading to a recruitment of motor units similar to that observed during voluntary contractions. In a very recent study conducted in our laboratory (INSERM U1093), it was demonstrated that the application of ES to the motor nerve at low intensities did not induce discomfort in healthy subjects, but could induce substantial strength gains (+25%) with adaptations occurring at both in the muscles and the nerves.

The proposed study is an innovative, randomized, pilot study based on motor nerve ES in a highly selected population of ICU patients in septic shock and therefore with a high risk of developing neuromyopathy, which is responsible for a significant increase in morbidity and mortality.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Septic Shock

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Standard support

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Usual care

Intervention Type OTHER

Standard management offered in the intensive care unit

Evaluation of the neuromuscular system

Intervention Type OTHER

Will be performed within 48 hours of admission to the ICU and at D7 of admission.

Includes:

* electrical stimulations (at an intensity to obtain 10% of the maximum M wave) in the leg at different frequencies with recording of the force developed by force sensor
* maximum and submaximal electrical stimulation of the leg with recording of the electrophysiological response by surface electrodes applied to the leg muscles, to evaluate muscular and spinal excitability.
* MRC scale to assess the motor function of different muscle groups of the lower and upper of the lower and upper limbs, depending on the patient's clinical condition.
* Maximum Voluntary Contractions (MVC) to evaluate the muscular strength of the plantar flexors, depending on the patient's clinical condition.

Standard treatment coupled with electro-stimulation sessions

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Usual care

Intervention Type OTHER

Standard management offered in the intensive care unit

Electrostimulation

Intervention Type OTHER

The patients included will receive throughout their stay, in addition to the standard care offered in the department, electrical nerve stimulation. The ES will be applied to the tibial nerve to allow contraction of the plantar flexors. The protocol will be applied twice a day, 5-7 days a week and will have the following characteristics: stimulation frequency 100Hz, pulse width 1ms, intensity allowing the development of 5-10% of the maximum tetanic force obtained during the force-frequency relation, contraction time 20s, recovery time 20s, for a total of 25 contractions per session.

Evaluation of the neuromuscular system

Intervention Type OTHER

Will be performed within 48 hours of admission to the ICU and at D7 of admission.

Includes:

* electrical stimulations (at an intensity to obtain 10% of the maximum M wave) in the leg at different frequencies with recording of the force developed by force sensor
* maximum and submaximal electrical stimulation of the leg with recording of the electrophysiological response by surface electrodes applied to the leg muscles, to evaluate muscular and spinal excitability.
* MRC scale to assess the motor function of different muscle groups of the lower and upper of the lower and upper limbs, depending on the patient's clinical condition.
* Maximum Voluntary Contractions (MVC) to evaluate the muscular strength of the plantar flexors, depending on the patient's clinical condition.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Usual care

Standard management offered in the intensive care unit

Intervention Type OTHER

Electrostimulation

The patients included will receive throughout their stay, in addition to the standard care offered in the department, electrical nerve stimulation. The ES will be applied to the tibial nerve to allow contraction of the plantar flexors. The protocol will be applied twice a day, 5-7 days a week and will have the following characteristics: stimulation frequency 100Hz, pulse width 1ms, intensity allowing the development of 5-10% of the maximum tetanic force obtained during the force-frequency relation, contraction time 20s, recovery time 20s, for a total of 25 contractions per session.

Intervention Type OTHER

Evaluation of the neuromuscular system

Will be performed within 48 hours of admission to the ICU and at D7 of admission.

Includes:

* electrical stimulations (at an intensity to obtain 10% of the maximum M wave) in the leg at different frequencies with recording of the force developed by force sensor
* maximum and submaximal electrical stimulation of the leg with recording of the electrophysiological response by surface electrodes applied to the leg muscles, to evaluate muscular and spinal excitability.
* MRC scale to assess the motor function of different muscle groups of the lower and upper of the lower and upper limbs, depending on the patient's clinical condition.
* Maximum Voluntary Contractions (MVC) to evaluate the muscular strength of the plantar flexors, depending on the patient's clinical condition.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age ≥ 18 years
* Admitted to the ICU for :

* Sepsis as defined by the presence of an infection, of known or suspected origin + organ dysfunction with a SOFA score ≥ 2
* Or septic shock defined by sepsis with persistent hypotension requiring vasopressors to maintain mean artérial blood pressure ≥ 65 mmHg and serum lactate level \> 2 mmol/l despite adequate vascular filling
* After obtaining informed consent from a relative/trusted person or patient included in an emergency situation
* Patient affiliated to national health insurance.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient with a contraindication to the application of ES (e.g. pacemaker, defibrillator)
* Patient with a diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism, confirmed and treated within the last 48 hours
* Patient with cardiac arrest prior to study inclusion
* Patient for whom a decision to limit or stop treatment has been made by the medical team
* Patients with a very poor prognosis in the very short term due to major co-morbidities (Child Pugh score C cirrhosis, terminal cancer, neuro-evolutionary disease with no treatment plan...)
* Patients with known neuro-orthopaedic and sensory disorders prior to inclusion, whether of originating in the spinal cord, nerve or brain.
* Person subject to a legal protection measure (curatorship, guardianship)
* Pregnant, parturient or breastfeeding women.


\- Patients receiving curare therapy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Chu Dijon Bourgogne

Dijon, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ANDREU AOI 2021

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Interest of Plasma microRNAs
NCT02464371 COMPLETED