Competency-based Assessment in Musculoskeletal Ultrasound

NCT ID: NCT05256355

Last Updated: 2022-10-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-05-01

Study Completion Date

2022-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Early diagnosis and rapid treatment initiation are of most importance to prevent joint damage in patients with arthritis. Musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS) is becoming an integrated part of rheumatology routine care and is more sensitive than clinical examination for detecting synovitis even in the early stage of disease.

However, MSUS is highly operator dependent and competences are needed to ensure correct image interpretation. Traditionally competences are evaluated on how many examinations the trainees have performed, but the gold standard has now shifted towards competency-based education where objective assessment tools are the key element. A previous study has developed a scale for assessment of ultrasound competence, The Objective Structured Assessment of Ultrasound skills (OSAUS). Although expert consensus supports evidence of content validity of the assessment instrument, it is not known if the OSAUS scale can discriminate differences in performance scores between different levels of MSUS experience in rheumatology in a reliable way.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Musculoskeletal Diseases

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

MSUS novices

Measurement of competence

Group Type OTHER

musculoskeletal ultrasound

Intervention Type OTHER

The participants will perform four MSUS examinations which are all videorecorded. All videos will be rated by two blinded raters using the OSAUS assessment tool.

MSUS intermediates

Measurement of competence

Group Type OTHER

musculoskeletal ultrasound

Intervention Type OTHER

The participants will perform four MSUS examinations which are all videorecorded. All videos will be rated by two blinded raters using the OSAUS assessment tool.

MSUS experts

Measurement of competence

Group Type OTHER

musculoskeletal ultrasound

Intervention Type OTHER

The participants will perform four MSUS examinations which are all videorecorded. All videos will be rated by two blinded raters using the OSAUS assessment tool.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

musculoskeletal ultrasound

The participants will perform four MSUS examinations which are all videorecorded. All videos will be rated by two blinded raters using the OSAUS assessment tool.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Physicians working at the rheumatology departments in Denmark:

1. Novices: No or little experience with MSUS (less than 100 examinations).
2. Intermediates: Participated and completed at least one formal ultrasound course and more than 100 examinations (less than 1000 MSUS examinations).
3. Physicians with a long experience in MSUS doing the procedure almost daily and providing teaching and/or research within this field (more than 1000 examinations).

Exclusion Criteria

* No informed consent
* Novices/Intermediates: extensive experience in MSUS
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Rigshospitalet, Denmark

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Stine Maya Dreier Carstensen

MD, PhD fellow, Principal investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Stine Maya Carstensen, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Copenhagen, Denmark

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Stine Carstensen

Glostrup Municipality, , Denmark

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Tolsgaard MG, Todsen T, Sorensen JL, Ringsted C, Lorentzen T, Ottesen B, Tabor A. International multispecialty consensus on how to evaluate ultrasound competence: a Delphi consensus survey. PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e57687. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057687. Epub 2013 Feb 28.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 23469051 (View on PubMed)

Brown AK, O'Connor PJ, Wakefield RJ, Roberts TE, Karim Z, Emery P. Practice, training, and assessment among experts performing musculoskeletal ultrasonography: toward the development of an international consensus of educational standards for ultrasonography for rheumatologists. Arthritis Rheum. 2004 Dec 15;51(6):1018-22. doi: 10.1002/art.20844.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 15593176 (View on PubMed)

Carstensen SMD, Terslev L, Jensen MP, Ostergaard M. Future use of musculoskeletal ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in rheumatoid arthritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2020 May;32(3):264-272. doi: 10.1097/BOR.0000000000000709.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 32205568 (View on PubMed)

Nayahangan LJ, Dietrich CF, Nielsen MB. Simulation-based training in ultrasound - where are we now? Ultraschall Med. 2021 Jun;42(3):240-244. doi: 10.1055/a-1352-5944. Epub 2021 Jun 15. No abstract available.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 34130348 (View on PubMed)

Carstensen SMD, Just SA, Pfeiffer-Jensen M, Ostergaard M, Konge L, Terslev L. Solid validity evidence for two tools assessing competences in musculoskeletal ultrasound: a validity study. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2024 Mar 1;63(3):765-771. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kead286.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37307078 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2022-002

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

The Prevalence of the Linburg-Comstock Variation
NCT06142370 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA