Ultrasound Evaluation of Remission in Rheumatoid Arthritis

NCT ID: NCT02930187

Last Updated: 2016-10-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

225 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-03-31

Study Completion Date

2016-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Evaluate correlations between the validated 12 joints-Naredo ultrasound score (B-mode (0-3), PD (0-3) or PDUS (0-3, max between B-mode or PD)) and the DAS28-ESR, DAS28-CRP, CDAI, SDAI and ACR-EULAR criteria for remission in routine care.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Clinical remission is now a realistic goal in managing rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with treat to target strategy assessed according to different composite scores (DAS28, Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI), Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), ACR-EULAR 2011 for remission). There are, however, no validated ultrasound remission criteria because of continuing uncertainty on the signification of persistent synovial hypertrophy in B-mode or Power Doppler (PD) mode in RA patients in clinical remission.

The objective was to evaluate correlations between the validated 12 joints-Naredo ultrasound score (B-mode (0-3), PD (0-3) or PDUS (0-3, max between B-mode or PD)) and the DAS28-ESR, DAS28-CRP, CDAI, SDAI and ACR-EULAR criteria for remission in routine care.

This french multicenter cross-sectional study took place in 11 rheumatology departments. The inter and intra-observer reproducibility for the ultrasound scoring was good to excellent. Inclusion criteria were as follows: RA meeting ACR-EULAR criteria, \<15 years of progression, DAS-28-ESR\<2.6 for at least 3 months, with a stable treatment including corticoids if necessary (equivalent prednisone\<0.1 mg/kg) for 6 months. A standardized US examination was performed by an experience ultrasonographist blinded to clinical data. Spearman's correlation coefficients were determined between the Naredo12 B-mode (min-max,0-36), PD mode (0-36) and PDUS (0-36) scores and the different clinical remission scores. The impact of disease duration or duration of the clinical remission on ultrasound scores was also assessed (Kruskall-Wallis's test).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Rheumatoid Arthritis Patient With Remission :Ultrasonographic Disease Activity

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adults (âged of 18 or more),
* Rheumatoid arthritis according to ACR-EULAR 2010 criteria, during less than 10 years at least
* Remission according to DAS28-VS (\<2.6) since 3 months at least,
* Disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs and/or biotherapy stable dose since 6 months at least
* Steroids ≤0.1 mg/kg/day without high dose during the last 3 months
* Oral and written information and consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient participating to a clinical trial about rheumatoid arthritis treatment
* Patient under administrative supervision
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Grenoble

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Philippe Gaudin, Pr

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital, Grenoble

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Aletaha D, Ward MM, Machold KP, Nell VP, Stamm T, Smolen JS. Remission and active disease in rheumatoid arthritis: defining criteria for disease activity states. Arthritis Rheum. 2005 Sep;52(9):2625-36. doi: 10.1002/art.21235.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16142705 (View on PubMed)

Aletaha D, Smolen JS. The Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) and Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) to monitor patients in standard clinical care. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2007 Aug;21(4):663-75. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2007.02.004.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17678828 (View on PubMed)

Ozgocmen S, Ozdemir H, Kiris A, Bozgeyik Z, Ardicoglu O. Clinical evaluation and power Doppler sonography in rheumatoid arthritis: evidence for ongoing synovial inflammation in clinical remission. South Med J. 2008 Mar;101(3):240-5. doi: 10.1097/SMJ.0b013e318164e16a.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18364651 (View on PubMed)

Balsa A, de Miguel E, Castillo C, Peiteado D, Martin-Mola E. Superiority of SDAI over DAS-28 in assessment of remission in rheumatoid arthritis patients using power Doppler ultrasonography as a gold standard. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2010 Apr;49(4):683-90. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kep442. Epub 2010 Jan 4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20047979 (View on PubMed)

Saleem B, Brown AK, Keen H, Nizam S, Freeston J, Wakefield R, Karim Z, Quinn M, Hensor E, Conaghan PG, Emery P. Should imaging be a component of rheumatoid arthritis remission criteria? A comparison between traditional and modified composite remission scores and imaging assessments. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011 May;70(5):792-8. doi: 10.1136/ard.2010.134445. Epub 2011 Jan 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21242236 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

DR-2015-072

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

38RC14.258

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.