Ultrasound Impact in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patient Reported Outcomes
NCT ID: NCT03228342
Last Updated: 2019-01-30
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
94 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-05-03
2019-01-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Ultrasound Utility in Routine Clinical Practise
NCT03124225
Ultrasound to Guide Treatment Decisions in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis According to a T2T Approach
NCT05717179
Ultrasound Efficacy in Moderate Rheumatoid Arthritis
NCT04662359
Musculoskeletal Ultrasound with Elastography in the Evaluation of Muscle State in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients
NCT06620484
Role of Ultrasound for Evaluating Rheumatoid Arthritis in Remission
NCT02618954
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Ultrasound shared
Patient will be assessed with ultrasound (GUS-7 score)
MusculoSkeletal Ultrasound
Patient will be assess with ultrasound (GUS-7 score) and the results will be informed to his/her attending Rheumatologist.
The Patient Reported Outcomes will be evaluated a 0,6 and 12 months after randomization.
Ultrasound not shared
Patient will be assessed with ultrasound (GUS-7 score)
MusculoSkeletal Ultrasound
Patient will be assess with ultrasound (GUS-7 score) and the results will not be informed to his/her attending Rheumatologist.
The Patient Reported Outcomes will be evaluated a 0,6 and 12 months after randomization.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
MusculoSkeletal Ultrasound
Patient will be assess with ultrasound (GUS-7 score) and the results will be informed to his/her attending Rheumatologist.
The Patient Reported Outcomes will be evaluated a 0,6 and 12 months after randomization.
MusculoSkeletal Ultrasound
Patient will be assess with ultrasound (GUS-7 score) and the results will not be informed to his/her attending Rheumatologist.
The Patient Reported Outcomes will be evaluated a 0,6 and 12 months after randomization.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients classified in remission/low disease activity
Exclusion Criteria
* Patient with recent trauma in the evaluated joints.
* Luxation in the MCP, PIP or MTP joints.
16 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion Salvador Zubiran
OTHER
Clínica de Artritis Temprana
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Virginia Pascual, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
INCMNSZ
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán
Mexico City, , Mexico
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Plaza M, Nowakowska-Plaza A, Pracon G, Sudol-Szopinska I. Role of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of rheumatic diseases in light of ACR/EULAR guidelines. J Ultrason. 2016 Mar;16(64):55-64. doi: 10.15557/JoU.2016.0006. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
Wakefield RJ, Gibbon WW, Conaghan PG, O'Connor P, McGonagle D, Pease C, Green MJ, Veale DJ, Isaacs JD, Emery P. The value of sonography in the detection of bone erosions in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison with conventional radiography. Arthritis Rheum. 2000 Dec;43(12):2762-70. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(200012)43:123.0.CO;2-#.
Nakagomi D, Ikeda K, Okubo A, Iwamoto T, Sanayama Y, Takahashi K, Yamagata M, Takatori H, Suzuki K, Takabayashi K, Nakajima H. Ultrasound can improve the accuracy of the 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League against rheumatism classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis to predict the requirement for methotrexate treatment. Arthritis Rheum. 2013 Apr;65(4):890-8. doi: 10.1002/art.37848.
Terslev L, von der Recke P, Torp-Pedersen S, Koenig MJ, Bliddal H. Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of Doppler ultrasound in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2008 Jan;35(1):49-53. Epub 2007 Dec 15.
Peluso G, Michelutti A, Bosello S, Gremese E, Tolusso B, Ferraccioli G. Clinical and ultrasonographic remission determines different chances of relapse in early and long standing rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011 Jan;70(1):172-5. doi: 10.1136/ard.2010.129924. Epub 2010 Nov 19.
Dale J, Purves D, McConnachie A, McInnes I, Porter D. Tightening up? Impact of musculoskeletal ultrasound disease activity assessment on early rheumatoid arthritis patients treated using a treat to target strategy. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2014 Jan;66(1):19-26. doi: 10.1002/acr.22218.
Smolen JS, Breedveld FC, Burmester GR, Bykerk V, Dougados M, Emery P, Kvien TK, Navarro-Compan MV, Oliver S, Schoels M, Scholte-Voshaar M, Stamm T, Stoffer M, Takeuchi T, Aletaha D, Andreu JL, Aringer M, Bergman M, Betteridge N, Bijlsma H, Burkhardt H, Cardiel M, Combe B, Durez P, Fonseca JE, Gibofsky A, Gomez-Reino JJ, Graninger W, Hannonen P, Haraoui B, Kouloumas M, Landewe R, Martin-Mola E, Nash P, Ostergaard M, Ostor A, Richards P, Sokka-Isler T, Thorne C, Tzioufas AG, van Vollenhoven R, de Wit M, van der Heijde D. Treating rheumatoid arthritis to target: 2014 update of the recommendations of an international task force. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Jan;75(1):3-15. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-207524. Epub 2015 May 12.
Galicia-Hernandez G, Parra-Salcedo F, Ugarte-Martinez P, Contreras-Yanez I, Ponce-de-Leon A, Pascual-Ramos V. Sustained moderate-to-high disease activity and higher Charlson score are predictors of incidental serious infection events in RA patients treated with conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs: a cohort study in the treat-to-target era. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2016 Mar-Apr;34(2):261-9. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
Backhaus M, Ohrndorf S, Kellner H, Strunk J, Backhaus TM, Hartung W, Sattler H, Albrecht K, Kaufmann J, Becker K, Sorensen H, Meier L, Burmester GR, Schmidt WA. Evaluation of a novel 7-joint ultrasound score in daily rheumatologic practice: a pilot project. Arthritis Rheum. 2009 Sep 15;61(9):1194-201. doi: 10.1002/art.24646.
Backhaus TM, Ohrndorf S, Kellner H, Strunk J, Hartung W, Sattler H, Iking-Konert C, Burmester GR, Schmidt WA, Backhaus M. The US7 score is sensitive to change in a large cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis over 12 months of therapy. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013 Jul;72(7):1163-9. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201397. Epub 2012 Sep 6.
Scire CA, Montecucco C, Codullo V, Epis O, Todoerti M, Caporali R. Ultrasonographic evaluation of joint involvement in early rheumatoid arthritis in clinical remission: power Doppler signal predicts short-term relapse. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2009 Sep;48(9):1092-7. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kep171. Epub 2009 Jun 26.
Saleem B, Brown AK, Quinn M, Karim Z, Hensor EM, Conaghan P, Peterfy C, Wakefield RJ, Emery P. Can flare be predicted in DMARD treated RA patients in remission, and is it important? A cohort study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2012 Aug;71(8):1316-21. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2011-200548. Epub 2012 Jan 31.
Brown AK, Conaghan PG, Karim Z, Quinn MA, Ikeda K, Peterfy CG, Hensor E, Wakefield RJ, O'Connor PJ, Emery P. An explanation for the apparent dissociation between clinical remission and continued structural deterioration in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Oct;58(10):2958-67. doi: 10.1002/art.23945.
Singh JA, Saag KG, Bridges SL Jr, Akl EA, Bannuru RR, Sullivan MC, Vaysbrot E, McNaughton C, Osani M, Shmerling RH, Curtis JR, Furst DE, Parks D, Kavanaugh A, O'Dell J, King C, Leong A, Matteson EL, Schousboe JT, Drevlow B, Ginsberg S, Grober J, St Clair EW, Tindall E, Miller AS, McAlindon T. 2015 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016 Jan;68(1):1-26. doi: 10.1002/art.39480. Epub 2015 Nov 6.
Fransen J, Langenegger T, Michel BA, Stucki G. Feasibility and validity of the RADAI, a self-administered rheumatoid arthritis disease activity index. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2000 Mar;39(3):321-7. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/39.3.321.
El Miedany Y, El Gaafary M, Palmer D. Assessment of the utility of visual feedback in the treatment of early rheumatoid arthritis patients: a pilot study. Rheumatol Int. 2012 Oct;32(10):3061-8. doi: 10.1007/s00296-011-2098-1. Epub 2011 Sep 11.
Wolfe F, Pincus T. Listening to the patient: a practical guide to self-report questionnaires in clinical care. Arthritis Rheum. 1999 Sep;42(9):1797-808. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(199909)42:93.0.CO;2-Q. No abstract available.
Kosinski M, Zhao SZ, Dedhiya S, Osterhaus JT, Ware JE Jr. Determining minimally important changes in generic and disease-specific health-related quality of life questionnaires in clinical trials of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2000 Jul;43(7):1478-87. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(200007)43:73.0.CO;2-M.
Anderson JK, Zimmerman L, Caplan L, Michaud K. Measures of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity: Patient (PtGA) and Provider (PrGA) Global Assessment of Disease Activity, Disease Activity Score (DAS) and Disease Activity Score with 28-Joint Counts (DAS28), Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI), Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), Patient Activity Score (PAS) and Patient Activity Score-II (PASII), Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data (RAPID), Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Activity Index (RADAI) and Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Activity Index-5 (RADAI-5), Chronic Arthritis Systemic Index (CASI), Patient-Based Disease Activity Score With ESR (PDAS1) and Patient-Based Disease Activity Score without ESR (PDAS2), and Mean Overall Index for Rheumatoid Arthritis (MOI-RA). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Nov;63 Suppl 11:S14-36. doi: 10.1002/acr.20621. No abstract available.
Lillegraven S, Prince FH, Shadick NA, Bykerk VP, Lu B, Frits ML, Iannaccone CK, Kvien TK, Haavardsholm EA, Weinblatt ME, Solomon DH. Remission and radiographic outcome in rheumatoid arthritis: application of the 2011 ACR/EULAR remission criteria in an observational cohort. Ann Rheum Dis. 2012 May;71(5):681-6. doi: 10.1136/ard.2011.154625. Epub 2011 Oct 12.
Fransen J, van Riel PL. Outcome measures in inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Arthritis Res Ther. 2009;11(5):244. doi: 10.1186/ar2745. Epub 2009 Oct 14.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRE-2218-17/19-1
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.