Thulium Fiber Laser (TFL) vs Holmium MOSES for Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH)
NCT ID: NCT05240001
Last Updated: 2024-08-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
104 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-04-20
2025-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is a safe and effective procedure which has demonstrated comparable results to TURP. HOLEP also offers patients the alternative of being treated endoscopically with minimal blood loss, short catheterization time, and decreased hospital stay. The main reason HoLEP has yet to become the new standard for treatment of symptomatic BPH is due the complexity of this procedure as compared to TURP. Furthermore, the HoLEP can be used with the MOSESTM system, a system that allows for more efficiency and ease of use of the HoLEP.
Thulium fiber laser (TFL) enucleation of the prostate is an emerging technology for endoscopic prostate enucleation that is notable for its high wavelength and pulsed mode of action. Recent studies have shown TFL enucleation of the prostate to be a safe and highly efficacious treatment modality for the management of large volume (\> 80 cm3) glands in BPH. Due to its novelty, further studies are needed to broaden the investigators' understanding of the TFL and comprehend the full implications and benefits of this new technology, as well its limitations.
The aim of this study is to whether Thulium Fiber laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuFLEP) and Holmium laser enucleation using MOSES™ (M-HoLEP) have comparable length of hospital stay, as well as intraoperative and postoperative outcomes.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Outpatient Holmium LASER Enucleation of the Prostate: Benefit of MOSES(TM) 2.0 Technology
NCT05768776
Thulium Fiber Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (TFLEP) vs HoLEP With Moses Technology (m-HoLEP)
NCT04807296
Application of MOSES Technology in BPH
NCT04648176
ThuLEP vs. HoLEP vs. Monopolar Enucleation in Management of BPH
NCT03230721
SOLTIVE™ Laser Enucleation for Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
NCT04826887
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Thulium Fibre Laser (TFL)
Patients randomized to this arm will undergo treatment using the TFL.
Thulium Fibre Laser
Participants will undergo treatment using the TFL
MOSES Holmium Laser
Patients randomized to this arm will undergo treatment using the MOSES Holmium laser.
MOSES Holmium Laser
Participants will undergo treatment using the MOSES Holmium laser.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Thulium Fibre Laser
Participants will undergo treatment using the TFL
MOSES Holmium Laser
Participants will undergo treatment using the MOSES Holmium laser.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Referred to urology for refractory LUTS or urinary retention secondary to BPH
3. Failed medical (non-surgical) treatment
4. Prostate size on preoperative TRUS of≥80 ml
5. IPSS \>15 and QOL score ≥3 and Qmax \<15 ml/sec
6. Written informed consent to participate in the study
7. Ability to comply with the requirements of the study procedures
Exclusion Criteria
2. History of prostate cancer
3. Prostate size \< 80 mL
4. History of urethral stenosis or its management
5. Known or suspected neurogenic bladder
6. Participants with active urinary tract infection until appropriately treated
7. Participants with preexisting conditions, which, in the opinion of the investigator, interfere with the conduct of the study
8. Participants who lack the capacity, or cannot speak English, in order to provide free and informed written consent
50 Years
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Thunder Bay Regional Health Research Institute
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Hazem Elmansy
Urologist
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Hazem Elmansy, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre
Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Hazem Elmansy, MD
Role: CONTACT
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
RP-775
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.