Laser Prostatectomy Database and Registry

NCT ID: NCT00159406

Last Updated: 2025-01-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

3000 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2003-10-31

Study Completion Date

2025-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

STATEMENT OF PURPOSE:

Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is the standard surgical intervention for obstructive benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in all but the largest of glands, which are typically treated with open simple prostatectomy. Recently, new generation lasers (holmium and potassium titanyl phosphate \[KTP\]) have been utilized for BPH treatment. Long-term follow-up of laser prostatectomy outcomes must be documented to fully characterize the degree of voiding improvement achievable by these new techniques, the durability of these outcomes, and the safety profiles of these procedures.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) affects over 40% of men over the age of 60 (Kirby RS, 2000). For patients with significant obstructive symptoms which are not helped by medical therapy, surgical intervention is instituted. Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), an endoscopic procedure where prostate tissue is sequentially removed with an electrocautery loop, remains the gold standard to which other surgical therapies are compared. Unfortunately, TURP is associated with significant patient morbidity such as blood loss and dilutional hyponatremia, especially when resection times are prolonged (Mebust WK et al, 1989).

Because of the long resection times and increased morbidity risks involved in patients with extremely large prostate glands, open simple prostatectomy was traditionally employed in place of TURP to remove the obstructing adenoma tissue. However, the patient could still expect a prolonged hospital stay and a high likelihood of post-operative transfusion.

Many alternative surgical treatments for BPH have been developed in an attempt to minimize the morbidity profile of the more traditional surgical approaches. New generation holmium (2140 nm wavelength) and KTP (532 nm wavelength) lasers now offer a minimally invasive alternative to BPH treatment broadly termed laser prostatectomy. Within the category of laser prostatectomy, two distinctly separate techniques have been developed. The first, laser ablation, involves the vaporization of obstructive prostate tissue. Effective ablation can be achieved with either the holmium or KTP laser. Previous groups have reported favorable outcomes with minimal associated morbidity when treating smaller prostates with the laser ablation technique (Hai MA and Malek RS, 2003).

The properties of the holmium laser also enable it to cut soft tissue while maintaining hemostasis, such that it can be utilized for dissecting entire prostatic lobes away from the prostatic capsule. This procedure has been termed holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP), and it can be performed on even the largest of glands to duplicate the results of open simple prostatectomy with much less morbidity (Gilling PJ et al, 2000 and Moody JA and Lingeman JE, 2001).

We have performed both holmium and KTP prostate ablations and have had extensive clinical experience with the HoLEP procedure. Our impressions of the various laser prostatectomy procedure outcomes appear to substantiate the findings of the aforementioned studies. However, extended follow-up of patients undergoing laser prostatectomies and documentation of their outcomes and associated complications must be done in order to support the initial conclusions of the previous investigators.

SPECIFIC AIMS:

To review the outcomes of our population of patients with BPH who have undergone laser prostatectomy. We hypothesize that the long-term improvements in voiding parameters achieved by these new laser procedures will compare favorably and perhaps be better than results previously reported for TURP or, in the case of larger glands, open simple prostatectomy. In addition, the adverse events/complication profile of the laser procedures should be better than those of the traditional treatments. Once all retrospective data has been reviewed, we will continue to collect outcome data on a prospective basis.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Enlarged Prostate

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

cohort

Registry and Database

Registry and Database

Intervention Type OTHER

Data Collection

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Registry and Database

Data Collection

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients of IU Health Physicians Urology in Indianapolis, Indiana
* Male patients over the age of 18 with benign prostatic hyperplasia requiring surgical intervention for symptomatic relief.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients unable or unwilling to provide informed consent
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Indiana Kidney Stone Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

James E Lingeman, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

IU Health Physicians Urology

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

IU Health Methodist Hospital

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Tinmouth WW, Habib E, Kim SC, Kuo RL, Paterson RF, Terry CL, Elhilali M, Lingeman JE. Change in serum prostate specific antigen concentration after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: a marker for completeness of adenoma resection? J Endourol. 2005 Jun;19(5):550-4. doi: 10.1089/end.2005.19.550.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15989443 (View on PubMed)

Kuo RL, Paterson RF, Kim SC, Siqueira TM Jr, Elhilali MM, Lingeman JE. Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP): A Technical Update. World J Surg Oncol. 2003 Jun 6;1(1):6. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-1-6.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 12818001 (View on PubMed)

Kuo RL, Kim SC, Lingeman JE, Paterson RF, Watkins SL, Simmons GR, Steele RE. Holmium laser enucleation of prostate (HoLEP): the Methodist Hospital experience with greater than 75 gram enucleations. J Urol. 2003 Jul;170(1):149-52. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000070686.56806.a1.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 12796668 (View on PubMed)

Peterson MD, Matlaga BR, Kim SC, Kuo RL, Soergel TM, Watkins SL, Lingeman JE. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for men with urinary retention. J Urol. 2005 Sep;174(3):998-1001; discussion 1001. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000170230.26743.e4.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 16094022 (View on PubMed)

Kim SC, Matlaga BR, Kuo RL, Watkins SL, Kennett KM, Gilling PJ, Lingeman JE. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: a comparison of efficiency measures at two institutions. J Endourol. 2005 Jun;19(5):555-8. doi: 10.1089/end.2005.19.555.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 15989444 (View on PubMed)

Kuo RL, Paterson RF, Siqueira TM Jr, Watkins SL, Simmons GR, Steele RE, Lingeman JE. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: morbidity in a series of 206 patients. Urology. 2003 Jul;62(1):59-63. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(03)00124-9.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 12837423 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

03-095

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

BPH Global Registry
NCT05543200 RECRUITING