The Effects of Holmium Laser Enucleation and Thulium Laser Enucleation on Continence, Urethral Stricture, and Sexual Function in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
NCT ID: NCT07334730
Last Updated: 2026-01-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
200 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2026-02-01
2026-10-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluating the Clinical Efficacy of Thulio vs. Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate
NCT07187180
ThuLEP vs. HoLEP vs. Monopolar Enucleation in Management of BPH
NCT03230721
Management of Dysuria and Irritative Symptoms After HoLEP: a Prospective Study Evaluating the Efficacy of Alpha-Blocker Therapy
NCT06865430
Holmium Laser Versus Thulium Laser Versus Bipolar Enucleation of the Prostate.
NCT03916536
Thulium Fiber Laser Enucleation of the Prostate: Learning Curve and Functional Outcomes - A Prospective Study
NCT07349147
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Detailed Description
Recent studies have demonstrated comparable perioperative and functional outcomes between HoLEP and ThuLEP, with no significant differences reported in terms of urinary retention, stress urinary incontinence, bladder neck contracture, or urethral stricture formation. However, postoperative evolution of urinary continence, overactive bladder symptoms, and sexual function remains a clinically relevant concern, particularly regarding patients' quality of life. Despite the increasing use of laser-based enucleation techniques, comparative data focusing on continence status, urethral or bladder neck stricture development, and sexual function outcomes remain limited.
To reduce postoperative complications, several surgical technique modifications have been introduced, including en bloc enucleation, two-lobe and three-lobe techniques, as well as urethral mucosa-preserving approaches such as single-N and double-N techniques. These modifications aim to preserve periurethral and paracollicular tissues, particularly in proximity to the verumontanum, thereby potentially improving functional outcomes.
The prevalence of BPH continues to rise in the aging population, often accompanied by systemic comorbidities and the use of anticoagulant or antithrombotic medications, which are associated with an increased risk of postoperative bleeding and hemorrhagic complications. Consequently, there is a growing need to evaluate the long-term outcomes of minimally invasive surgical techniques in this patient population.
This study aims to address existing gaps in the literature by providing comparative data on the long-term functional outcomes of minimally invasive surgical approaches for BPH, thereby contributing to improved patient selection, surgical technique optimization, and postoperative quality-of-life outcomes.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Benign Prostatic Obstruction Patient Group
The effects of Holmium Laser Enucleation (HoLEP) and Thulium Laser Enucleation (ThuLEP) surgeries on continence, urethral stricture, and sexual function in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia were investigated prospectively.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Indication for surgical treatment of BPH.
* Male patients aged 40-90 years.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients at high risk who cannot undergo spinal or general anesthesia.
* Patients with uncontrolled bleeding diathesis.
40 Years
90 Years
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
TC Erciyes University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Halil Tosun
Halil Tosun Assistant Proffessor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
HALİL TOSUN, Assistant Professor
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
TC Erciyes University
EMRE C. AKINSAL, Assoc. Prof.
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
TC Erciyes University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Erciyes University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Urology
Kayseri, Melikgazi, Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
COMP_AFTER_HOLEP_THULEP_26
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.