HoLEP vs. Greenlight 532nm-laser PVEP vs. Bipolar TURP in Management of Moderate/ Large BPH
NCT ID: NCT02332538
Last Updated: 2019-10-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
182 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-03-31
2019-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
In this study the investigators planned to test the Greenlight (532-nm) laser Photoselective Vapo-Enucleation of the Prostate (PVEP) using (XPS) 180W system compared to bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate (TURis) and Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HOLEP) in reduction of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to BPH in a prospective randomized trial.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Trial of HoLEP vs. PVP in Treating BPH in Patients With Bleeding Tendency
NCT02293759
GreenLight Laser Photoselective Vaporization of the Prostate vs Bipolar Transurethral Vaporization of the Prostate; RCT
NCT02283684
HoLEP Vs BPEP for Large Prostatic Adenoma
NCT04275076
Green LEP vs ThuLEP in Management of Marked Enlarged Prostate
NCT03305861
HoLEP vs BipolEP in Management of BPH Patients With Large Prostates
NCT06759194
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In this study the investigators planned to test the Greenlight (532-nm) laser Photoselective Vapo-Enucleation of the Prostate (PVEP) using (XPS) 180W system compared to bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate (TURis) and Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HOLEP) in reduction of LUTS secondary to BPH in a prospective randomized trial.
Furthermore, all peri-operative parameters, urinary flow parameters, prostate size changes and complications associated with the procedures were compared. The prostate size limitations will be assessed in relation to the outcome measures.
Moderate to large size prostate (80-120 ml TRUS estimated volume) will be randomized to PVEP vs. Bipolar TURP vs. HoLEP.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Greenlight (532nm-laser) PVEP
532nm-laser photoselective vapo-enucleation of the prostate)
532nm-laser photoselective vapo-enucleation of the prostate)
using Greenlight (532nm-laser) modified vaporization technique, PVEP (photoselective vapo-enucleation of the prostate)
Holmium laser enucleation of prostate
Holmium-Yag laser enucleation of the prostate
Holmium laser enucleation of prostate
Holmium-Yag laser enucleation of the prsotate
Bipolar TURP
Bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate in saline
Bipolar TURP
Bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate in saline
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
532nm-laser photoselective vapo-enucleation of the prostate)
using Greenlight (532nm-laser) modified vaporization technique, PVEP (photoselective vapo-enucleation of the prostate)
Holmium laser enucleation of prostate
Holmium-Yag laser enucleation of the prsotate
Bipolar TURP
Bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate in saline
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. LUTS secondary to BOO due to BPH who failed medical treatment
3. International prostate symptom scores 8 (IPSS) \>15 and bother score 8 (QOL) ≥ 3 (according to IPSS question 8)
4. Peak urinary flow rate (Qmax) \<15 ml/sec with at least 125 ml voided volume or Patients with acute urine retention secondary to BPH who failed trial of voiding on medical treatment.
5. ASA (American society of anaesthesiologists) score ≤3.
6. TRUS prostate size (\>/=80ml)
Exclusion Criteria
2. Active urinary tract infection,
3. Presence of active bladder cancer (within the last 2 years)
4. Known prostate cancer patients will be excluded preoperatively on the basis of digital rectal examination, prostate specific antigen level, and TRUS imaging followed by prostate biopsies if necessary.
50 Years
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Mansoura University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ahmed Elshal
Dr
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ahmed M Elshal, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Mansoura University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Urology and Nephrology Center
Al Mansurah, Aldakahlia, Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MS/16.04.79
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.