ThuLEP vs. HoLEP vs. Monopolar Enucleation in Management of BPH
NCT ID: NCT03230721
Last Updated: 2017-07-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
450 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-01-15
2017-07-21
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Thulium Fiber Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (TFLEP) vs HoLEP With Moses Technology (m-HoLEP)
NCT04807296
The Effects of Holmium Laser Enucleation and Thulium Laser Enucleation on Continence, Urethral Stricture, and Sexual Function in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
NCT07334730
Evaluating the Clinical Efficacy of Thulio vs. Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate
NCT07187180
Top-Down Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP) vs the Traditional HoLEP for Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH)
NCT04391114
HoLEP (50W) vs. HoLEP (100W) for Treatment of BPH
NCT02737241
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
To our knowledge, there were no studies comparing efficacy and complications of these three treatment modalities.
In this study the investigators have evaluated efficacy of Thulium-fiber laser enucleation (120 W thulium fiber laser Urolase, IPG IRE-POLUS, Russia with wavelength of 1940 nm) and monopolar enuclation in comparision with HoLEP (VersaPulse Powersuite 100, Lumenis, USA/Israel) in reduction of LUTS secondary to BPH in a prospective randomized trial.
All peri-operative parameters, urinary flow parameters, prostate size changes, erectile function and complications associated with the procedures were compared.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
ThuLEP group
Patients who underwent thulium-fiber laser enucleation of the prostate due to lower urinary tract symptoms caused by prostatic hyperplasia.
Thulium-fiber laser enucleation of the prostate
A high-power (120 W) thulium fiber laser (Urolase, IPG IRE-POLUS, Russia) with wavelength of 1940 nm was used for thulium laser enucleation. In our study, we used a 600-μm laser fiber. The operations were performed at power of 60 W energy of 1.5 J and repetition rate of 40 Hz. Laser power in the verumontanum zone was decreased to 30 W and repetition rate to 20 Hz.
Monopolar enucleation group
Patients who underwent monopolar enucleation of the prostate due to lower urinary tract symptoms caused by prostatic hyperplasia.
Monopolar enucleation of the prostate
Monopolar enucleation was performed with a high-frequency generator (50-60 Hz), a pusher-electrode, and a hook-electrode.
HoLEP group
Patients who underwent Ho:YAG laser enucleation of the prostate due to lower urinary tract symptoms caused by prostatic hyperplasia.
Ho:YAG laser enucleation of the prostate
Holmium laser enucleation of prostatic hyperplasia was performed with a 100 W laser (VersaPulse Powersuite 100, Lumenis, USA/Israel) with wavelength of 2100 nm and 550-μm fiber at the tip. The operation was performed at power of 70 W; it was decreased to 40 W when incisions were made at the verumontanum.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Thulium-fiber laser enucleation of the prostate
A high-power (120 W) thulium fiber laser (Urolase, IPG IRE-POLUS, Russia) with wavelength of 1940 nm was used for thulium laser enucleation. In our study, we used a 600-μm laser fiber. The operations were performed at power of 60 W energy of 1.5 J and repetition rate of 40 Hz. Laser power in the verumontanum zone was decreased to 30 W and repetition rate to 20 Hz.
Monopolar enucleation of the prostate
Monopolar enucleation was performed with a high-frequency generator (50-60 Hz), a pusher-electrode, and a hook-electrode.
Ho:YAG laser enucleation of the prostate
Holmium laser enucleation of prostatic hyperplasia was performed with a 100 W laser (VersaPulse Powersuite 100, Lumenis, USA/Israel) with wavelength of 2100 nm and 550-μm fiber at the tip. The operation was performed at power of 70 W; it was decreased to 40 W when incisions were made at the verumontanum.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* maximum urinary flow rate\< 10ml\\s (Qmax);
* ineffective alfa-blockers therapy.
Exclusion Criteria
* history of prostatic surgery;
* urethral strictures;
* bladder stones;
* chronic urinary retention and cystostomy.
50 Years
90 Years
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Dmitry Enikeev, MD, PhD
Deputy Director for Sсience, Dept. of Urology, I.M. Sechenov Moscow State Medical University
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Dmitry Enikeev, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Gratzke C, Bachmann A, Descazeaud A, Drake MJ, Madersbacher S, Mamoulakis C, Oelke M, Tikkinen KAO, Gravas S. EAU Guidelines on the Assessment of Non-neurogenic Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms including Benign Prostatic Obstruction. Eur Urol. 2015 Jun;67(6):1099-1109. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.12.038. Epub 2015 Jan 19.
Cornu JN, Ahyai S, Bachmann A, de la Rosette J, Gilling P, Gratzke C, McVary K, Novara G, Woo H, Madersbacher S. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Functional Outcomes and Complications Following Transurethral Procedures for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Resulting from Benign Prostatic Obstruction: An Update. Eur Urol. 2015 Jun;67(6):1066-1096. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.06.017. Epub 2014 Jun 25.
Glybochko PV, Rapoport LM, Enikeev ME, Enikeev DV. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) for small, large and giant prostatic hyperplasia: tips and tricks. Urologia. 2017 Aug 1;84(3):169-173. doi: 10.5301/uj.5000232. Epub 2017 May 10.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IMSechenovMMA
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.