ThuLEP vs. HoLEP vs. Monopolar Enucleation in Management of BPH

NCT ID: NCT03230721

Last Updated: 2017-07-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

450 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-01-15

Study Completion Date

2017-07-21

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Today, endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (EEP) has been recognized a method of choice for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) of any size, including large-sized glands (\>80 cc). The goal of our study was to compare perioperative efficacy, functional outcomes and safety of different techniques of endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (monopolar enucleation, holmium laser enucleation, thulium laser enucleation) in a single center.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

HoLEP and ThuLEP or EEP have been approved by the current guidelines of the European Association of Urology for use in men with substantially enlarged prostates (\>80 ml) as first-line therapy \[1\]. This type of operation can be performed by means of several sources of energy.

To our knowledge, there were no studies comparing efficacy and complications of these three treatment modalities.

In this study the investigators have evaluated efficacy of Thulium-fiber laser enucleation (120 W thulium fiber laser Urolase, IPG IRE-POLUS, Russia with wavelength of 1940 nm) and monopolar enuclation in comparision with HoLEP (VersaPulse Powersuite 100, Lumenis, USA/Israel) in reduction of LUTS secondary to BPH in a prospective randomized trial.

All peri-operative parameters, urinary flow parameters, prostate size changes, erectile function and complications associated with the procedures were compared.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Prostatic Hyperplasia, Benign Prostate Adenoma Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

ThuLEP group

Patients who underwent thulium-fiber laser enucleation of the prostate due to lower urinary tract symptoms caused by prostatic hyperplasia.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Thulium-fiber laser enucleation of the prostate

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

A high-power (120 W) thulium fiber laser (Urolase, IPG IRE-POLUS, Russia) with wavelength of 1940 nm was used for thulium laser enucleation. In our study, we used a 600-μm laser fiber. The operations were performed at power of 60 W energy of 1.5 J and repetition rate of 40 Hz. Laser power in the verumontanum zone was decreased to 30 W and repetition rate to 20 Hz.

Monopolar enucleation group

Patients who underwent monopolar enucleation of the prostate due to lower urinary tract symptoms caused by prostatic hyperplasia.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Monopolar enucleation of the prostate

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Monopolar enucleation was performed with a high-frequency generator (50-60 Hz), a pusher-electrode, and a hook-electrode.

HoLEP group

Patients who underwent Ho:YAG laser enucleation of the prostate due to lower urinary tract symptoms caused by prostatic hyperplasia.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Ho:YAG laser enucleation of the prostate

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Holmium laser enucleation of prostatic hyperplasia was performed with a 100 W laser (VersaPulse Powersuite 100, Lumenis, USA/Israel) with wavelength of 2100 nm and 550-μm fiber at the tip. The operation was performed at power of 70 W; it was decreased to 40 W when incisions were made at the verumontanum.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Thulium-fiber laser enucleation of the prostate

A high-power (120 W) thulium fiber laser (Urolase, IPG IRE-POLUS, Russia) with wavelength of 1940 nm was used for thulium laser enucleation. In our study, we used a 600-μm laser fiber. The operations were performed at power of 60 W energy of 1.5 J and repetition rate of 40 Hz. Laser power in the verumontanum zone was decreased to 30 W and repetition rate to 20 Hz.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Monopolar enucleation of the prostate

Monopolar enucleation was performed with a high-frequency generator (50-60 Hz), a pusher-electrode, and a hook-electrode.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Ho:YAG laser enucleation of the prostate

Holmium laser enucleation of prostatic hyperplasia was performed with a 100 W laser (VersaPulse Powersuite 100, Lumenis, USA/Israel) with wavelength of 2100 nm and 550-μm fiber at the tip. The operation was performed at power of 70 W; it was decreased to 40 W when incisions were made at the verumontanum.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

ThuLEP Monopolar enucleation HoLEP

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* IPSS\>20;
* maximum urinary flow rate\< 10ml\\s (Qmax);
* ineffective alfa-blockers therapy.

Exclusion Criteria

* histologically verified prostate cancer;
* history of prostatic surgery;
* urethral strictures;
* bladder stones;
* chronic urinary retention and cystostomy.
Minimum Eligible Age

50 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dmitry Enikeev, MD, PhD

Deputy Director for Sсience, Dept. of Urology, I.M. Sechenov Moscow State Medical University

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Dmitry Enikeev, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Gratzke C, Bachmann A, Descazeaud A, Drake MJ, Madersbacher S, Mamoulakis C, Oelke M, Tikkinen KAO, Gravas S. EAU Guidelines on the Assessment of Non-neurogenic Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms including Benign Prostatic Obstruction. Eur Urol. 2015 Jun;67(6):1099-1109. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.12.038. Epub 2015 Jan 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25613154 (View on PubMed)

Cornu JN, Ahyai S, Bachmann A, de la Rosette J, Gilling P, Gratzke C, McVary K, Novara G, Woo H, Madersbacher S. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Functional Outcomes and Complications Following Transurethral Procedures for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Resulting from Benign Prostatic Obstruction: An Update. Eur Urol. 2015 Jun;67(6):1066-1096. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.06.017. Epub 2014 Jun 25.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24972732 (View on PubMed)

Glybochko PV, Rapoport LM, Enikeev ME, Enikeev DV. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) for small, large and giant prostatic hyperplasia: tips and tricks. Urologia. 2017 Aug 1;84(3):169-173. doi: 10.5301/uj.5000232. Epub 2017 May 10.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28497447 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IMSechenovMMA

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

HoLEP Vs BPEP for Large Prostatic Adenoma
NCT04275076 COMPLETED PHASE3