Slim Sheath 22F Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP) vs 26 F Sheath HoLEP for BPH: RCT

NCT ID: NCT06546865

Last Updated: 2024-08-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

142 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-04-16

Study Completion Date

2025-04-16

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is routinely performed with 24F, 26F, and 28F laser scopes. Proponents of larger caliber scopes suggest that the larger scope size allows for improved visualization, hemostasis, and operative efficiencies. Proponents of a smaller scope diameter suggest that by eliminating the need for pre-HoLEP urethral dilation to accommodate a larger scope. It has also been proposed that a smaller caliber scope is less traumatic to the urethra resulting in lower rates of bladder neck contracture and urethral stricture disease. Currently, to our knowledge, there are no level one evaluation examining scope size 22F versus 26F sheath in laser enucleation outcomes. The aim of our study is to determine if a smaller diameter scope is associated with improved laser enucleation time, post-operative recovery, rates of same-day discharge, or increasing intra-operative or postoperative complication rates

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

22F Sheath Size

Comparator arm for procedures using 22F sheath size

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

22F Sheath Size

Intervention Type DEVICE

Participants in this group will have the 22F sheath size used in their procedure.

26F Sheath Size

Comparator arm for procedures using 26F sheath size

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

26F Sheath Size

Intervention Type DEVICE

Participants in this group will have the 26F sheath size used in their procedure.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

22F Sheath Size

Participants in this group will have the 22F sheath size used in their procedure.

Intervention Type DEVICE

26F Sheath Size

Participants in this group will have the 26F sheath size used in their procedure.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Males over 50 years of age at the time of enrollment
2. Referred to urology for refractory LUTS secondary to BPH
3. Failed medical (non-surgical) treatment
4. Prostate size on preoperative TRUS of \> 80 ml
5. IPSS \>15, QOL score ≥3 and Qmax \<15 ml/sec
6. Written informed consent to participate in the study
7. Ability to comply with the requirements of the study procedures

Exclusion Criteria

1. Previous surgical treatment for BPH
2. History of prostate cancer
3. Prostate size \< 80 mL
4. History of urethral stenosis or its management
5. Known or suspected neurogenic bladder
6. Participants with active urinary tract infection until appropriately treated
7. Participants with preexisting conditions, which, in the opinion of the investigator, interfere with the conduct of the study
Minimum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Thunder Bay Regional Health Research Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Hazem Elmansy

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre

Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Rabail Siddiqui

Role: CONTACT

(807) 684-6000

Shalyn Littlefield

Role: CONTACT

(807) 684-6000

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Rabail Siddiqui

Role: primary

(807) 684-6000

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RP-1064

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.