A Long-Term Study Examining the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia With Photoselective Vaporization
NCT ID: NCT00465101
Last Updated: 2015-10-28
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
150 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2007-05-31
2013-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Phase 4 Study of Greenlight XPS Laser Versus BiVAP Saline Vaporization of the Prostate in Men With Symptomatic Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
NCT01500057
Photoselective Vaporization of the Prostate With the GreenLight XPS™ Laser System vs TURP for the Treatment of BPH
NCT01218672
A Pilot Study Of The ALPFA Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) Pulsed Field Ablation (PFA) System
NCT06965582
GreenLight XPS Laser System Retrospective Chart Review
NCT02139969
KTP Green Light Prostatectomy Compared With TUR-P in High Risk Patients
NCT02075736
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) is a relatively new technology that has similar benefits with fewer side effects than TURP. PVP is a minimally invasive procedure that uses a special high-energy laser to eliminate excess prostate tissue and seal the treated area. This technology has been used for more than a decade with over 200,000 procedures performed worldwide.
The focus of this study is to 1) document the long-term advantages of GreenLight HPS 120w and 2) to show that the stronger laser is a more flexible and efficient device which allows for a shorter procedure time, may be done in an out-patient setting in healthy patients, allows for shorter catheterization time, may result in a rapid urinary flow rate with minimal side effects, and may allow a quick return to normal activities. This device has been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treatment of obstructive BPH.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
GreenLight HPS
GreenLight HPS
Greenlight HPS laser system for treatment of BPH
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
GreenLight HPS
Greenlight HPS laser system for treatment of BPH
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* An unstable cardiopulmonary disorder, previously or recently diagnosed by standard methods
* A myocardial infarction or coronary artery stent placement within 6 months of the treatment
* Neurogenic lower urinary dysfunction
* A post-void residual (PVR) volume ≥ 400 mL
* Pre-existing urinary incontinence
* Active localized or systemic infection, including urinary tract infection (UTI) or prostatitis affecting bladder function
* Pre-existing damage of external urinary sphincter
* Presence of cystolithiasis, urethral stricture, or bladder neck contracture
* Prostate volume (PV), as measured by transrectal ultrasound (TRUS), less than 30cc or greater than 200cc
* Previously confirmed or suspected malignancy of prostate or bladder, treated or untreated
* Immunocompromised subjects
* Serious bleeding disorders and coagulopathy. For example: hemophilia or Von Willebrand's disease
* Desire to preserve antegrade ejaculation
* Calcification of prostate tissue, usually after severe prostatitis
* Deemed unfit for laser vaporization as determined by the attending physician
* Enrollment in a concurrent clinical trial of any treatment (drug or device) that could affect urogenital function without sponsors' approval
* Unable or unwilling to sign the Informed Consent Form (ICF) and/or comply with all follow-up requirements
45 Years
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
American Medical Systems
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Claus G Roehrborn, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
UT Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
UCLA
Los Angeles, California, United States
Connecticut Clinical Reseach Center
Middlebury, Connecticut, United States
North Fulton Urology, P.C.
Roswell, Georgia, United States
Affiliates in Urology
Detroit, Michigan, United States
PC Group/Universtiy Urology Association
New York, New York, United States
Glickman Urological Institute
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Oklahoma University Health Science Center_Urology
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
UT Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas
Dallas, Texas, United States
Urology of Virginia
Virginia Beach, Virginia, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PE0603
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.