A Placebo Controlled Study of MR901 (Talaporfin Sodium Sodium + a Drug-activating Device) for the Relief of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Due to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

NCT ID: NCT02326454

Last Updated: 2018-08-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

225 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-11-30

Study Completion Date

2017-03-29

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study investigates the safety and efficacy of a photosensitive drug (talaporfin sodium) activated by an intraurethrally placed drug-activating device. MR901 is a code used to identify the combination of talaporfin sodium and the drug-activating device. Two different light doses will be tested against placebo groups in this 4-arm study.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

At least 192 patients with moderate-to-severe LUTS caused by BPH will be randomized in a 2:2:1:1 ratio to receive a single treatment of talaporfin sodium activated by light at one of two light doses or placebo (saline) with light at either dose. Follow-up is planned for 52 weeks from the day of treatment, with assessment at 12 weeks for change in International Prostate Symptom Score and continued follow-up during the remaining 40 weeks to assess duration of effect, need for any intervention, and longer-term safety.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Talaporfin sodium/Light dose 100 J/cm

Single 1 mg/kg dose of talaporfin sodium is administered intravenously with Drug Activator 100 J/cm delivering light for 60 minutes of the 2-hour treatment period

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

talaporfin sodium

Intervention Type DRUG

1 mg/kg

Drug Activator 100 J/cm

Intervention Type DEVICE

Light Dose: 100 J/cm

Talaporfin sodium/Light dose 200 J/cm

Single 1 mg/kg dose of talaporfin sodium is administered intravenously with Drug Activator 200 J/cm delivering light for 2 hours

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

talaporfin sodium

Intervention Type DRUG

1 mg/kg

Drug Activator 200 J/cm

Intervention Type DEVICE

Light Dose: 200 J/cm

Saline/Light dose 100 J/cm

0.9% Sodium Chloride is administered intravenously with Drug Activator 100 J/cm delivering light for 60 minutes of the 2-hour treatment period

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Saline

Intervention Type DRUG

Drug Activator 100 J/cm

Intervention Type DEVICE

Light Dose: 100 J/cm

Saline/Light dose 200 J/cm

0.9% Sodium Chloride is administered intravenously with Drug Activator 200 J/cm delivering light for 2 hours.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Saline

Intervention Type DRUG

Drug Activator 200 J/cm

Intervention Type DEVICE

Light Dose: 200 J/cm

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

talaporfin sodium

1 mg/kg

Intervention Type DRUG

Saline

Intervention Type DRUG

Drug Activator 100 J/cm

Light Dose: 100 J/cm

Intervention Type DEVICE

Drug Activator 200 J/cm

Light Dose: 200 J/cm

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

LS11 NPe6 mono-(L)-aspartyl chlorin e6 ME2906 Laserphyrin MR901is the combination of talaporfin sodium and the drug-activating device Placebo Litx™ BPH Device Litx™ BPH Device

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Males aged ≥40 years, weighing ≤200 Kg and able to provide written, informed consent.
2. Documented symptoms of BPH-LUTS for 6 months or more.
3. For patients regularly taking their prescribed BPH medication, dose should have been stable for at least 6 months for 5-alpha reductase inhibitors and 3 months for other BPH medications.
4. For patients who have withdrawn from regularly taking their prescribed BPH medication, there should have been a 6 month washout period for 5-alpha reductase inhibitors and 3 months for other BPH medications.
5. Have a total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS; Qs 1-7) of ≥ 15 at both V1 and V2 with a difference between those visits of ≤ 4 points.
6. Prostate volume of 30 - 80 mL (inclusive).
7. Maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax): 5 - 15 mL/sec (assessed on two voids each of ≥ 150mL).
8. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≤10 ng/mL.
9. Post-void residual (PVR) volume ≤200 mL measured by a urinary catheter or bladder ultrasound according to local standard practice.
10. Prostatic urethral length (PUL) of between 30 - 55mm (inclusive) as measured by TRUS.
11. Willing and able to comply with photosensitivity precautions

Exclusion Criteria

1. Any minimally invasive or surgical treatment within the last 12 months, and is not currently undergoing intraprostatic injections for BPH or any other prostatic condition. In any case, all enrolled subjects must have, at Baseline cystoscopy, an appearance/presentation of the prostate that is consistent with BPH and compatible with possible response to the study test treatment.
2. Subjects weighing \>200 Kg.
3. Subjects with a history or current evidence of any of the following:

1. A bladder disease or condition co-exists, such as idiopathic over-active bladder (OAB) and is evaluated by the Investigator as the predominant etiology for the subject's voiding symptomatology. A score of 4 points or greater on the 3 item OAB Awareness Tool (OABV3) or a high rate of urinary frequency (\>13xday and/or 4x/night) would require investigator specific evaluation in ascribing these symptoms to a bladder condition as opposed to lower urinary tract obstruction. i) If the former is the assessment, then the subject requires exclusion from the study. ii) If the latter is the assessment, then the subject may be deemed eligible for inclusion.

The subject eligibility explanation must be captured in the patient source documents.
2. Active urinary tract infection i.e. must have a screening urinalysis without signs of infection or negative urine culture. Must not have had a previous symptomatic urinary tract infection within 4 weeks of the study.
3. Urethral stricture or any other anatomical feature that would complicate catheterisation.
4. Interstitial cystitis.
5. Predominant prostate middle lobe, as determined by the Investigator.
6. Prostate or bladder cancer or bladder carcinoma-in-situ - in particular, evidence from digital rectal exam (DRE) of prostate abnormalities suggestive of cancer in the last 12 months.
7. Any other absolute indication for urosurgical intervention (such as acute or frequent retention, currently untreated bladder or urethral stones, urethral strictures/bladder neck contracture (BNC)).
8. Damage to the bladder neck which could interfere with study procedures.
4. PSA level in excess of \>10 ng/ml. If the PSA measurement is 2.5-10 ng/ml and/or has shown a clinically significant concerning increase in the last 6 months, local standard of care must be pursued to ensure the possibility of prostate cancer has been followed up and ruled out prior to study entry.
5. Subjects who had had a prostate biopsy within 6 weeks prior to Screening.
6. Any neurological condition affecting the bladder or a history of a neurogenic or chronically decompensated bladder i.e. neurogenic bladder, Parkinson's disease, history of chronic prostatitis within the last 5 years.
7. Prior treatment for urinary incontinence.
8. Requirements for daily incontinence pads or devices.
9. Subjects in whom nocturia is due to etiologies other than their BPH-LUTS, such as neurogenic bladder, diabetic neuropathy, neurocongestive heart failure, hepatic failure, nephritic syndrome, sleep disorder.
10. Previous or concurrent clinically relevant cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disorder within 24 weeks prior to the study i.e. unstable angina pectoris, myocardial infarction, transient ischemic attack, or cerebrovascular accident (stroke) within the past 6 months, or peripheral arterial disease with intermittent claudication or Leriche's syndrome.
11. Presence of serious hepatic diseases, renal diseases, immunological diseases, or pulmonary diseases that are clinically relevant.
12. Unwilling to use contraception for 3 months following administration of study medication or with an interest in future fertility.
13. A prolonged QTcF interval at baseline and/or who are currently taking medication that prolongs QT interval ("prolonged QTcF interval" defined as \> 450 ms).
14. Known sensitivity to porphyrin-type drugs or known history of porphyria.
15. Any contraindications to use of the study treatment.
16. Active alcohol or drug abuse.
17. Subject has clinical laboratory test results outside the reference ranges of the testing laboratory that are deemed to be clinically significant. Subjects with isolated test results that are outside the specified ranges and that are assessed as clinically insignificant will be allowed at the discretion of the Investigator, after discussion with the Sponsor's Medical Monitor/Study Physician, if appropriate. If a subject has 1 isolated test result outside the specific range that is deemed potentially clinically significant, rescreening may be allowed at the discretion of the Investigator, after discussion with the Medical Monitor/Study Physician
18. Subjects with known disorders of coagulation, apart from those receiving anticoagulant / antithrombotic / antiplatelet therapy in whom the dose of such medication must have been stable for at least 1 month prior to randomisation. In those receiving Vitamin K antagonists (warfarin, acenocoumarol, phenindione, etc) the INR value at baseline should be \<3.0.
19. Inability or unwillingness to comply with the required photosensitivity precautions during the three weeks following study treatment.
20. Subjects taking medications with a recognised propensity for causing photosensitivity (such as amiodarone, tetracyclines, sulphonamides) that cannot be discontinued for the initial study period, namely from 14 days prior to administration of study medication until 28 days afterwards.
21. Subjects with medical or investigation results deemed unfit for study treatment, as determined by medical history, clinical laboratory tests, ECG results, and physical examination that, in the Investigator's opinion, preclude entry into the study.
22. Subjects who have received an investigational medicinal product within 30 days or 5 half-lives of the investigational product prior to study entry (defined as the start of the Screening Period).
23. Subjects who are incapable of giving informed consent or complying with the protocol.
Minimum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Mundipharma Research Limited

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Light Sciences Oncology

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Lisa Koch-Hulle

Role:

LSO

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Anniston, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Huntsville, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Anchorage, Alaska, United States

Site Status

Laguna Hills, California, United States

Site Status

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Murrieta, California, United States

Site Status

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Tarzana, California, United States

Site Status

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Aventura, Florida, United States

Site Status

Bradenton, Florida, United States

Site Status

Coral Gables, Florida, United States

Site Status

Pompano Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

St. Petersburg, Florida, United States

Site Status

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Bloomington, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Greenwood, Indiana, United States

Site Status

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Greenbelt, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Towson, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Edison, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Garden City, New York, United States

Site Status

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Newburgh, New York, United States

Site Status

Poughkeepsie, New York, United States

Site Status

Concord, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Middleburg Heights, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Springfield, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Bala-Cynwyd, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Bryn Mawr, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Knoxville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Mountlake Terrace, Washington, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MR901-2501

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

A Study in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
NCT01152190 COMPLETED PHASE3
Deprescribing Tamsulosin in Older Men
NCT05415748 COMPLETED PHASE4