KTP (Potassium-titanyl-phosphate) Laser Versus TUR-P (Transurethral Resection of Prostate)

NCT ID: NCT02011308

Last Updated: 2017-11-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

217 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-01-31

Study Completion Date

2015-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to compare safety and efficacy of Green Light PVP (Photoselective Vaporisation of the Prostate) compared to TUR-P.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

BPH (Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia)

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Green Light Laser

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Green light Laser

Intervention Type DEVICE

Laser vs TURP

Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Laser vs TURP

TURP

Transurethral Resection of the Prostate

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Green light Laser

Intervention Type DEVICE

Laser vs TURP

Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Laser vs TURP

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Green light Laser

Laser vs TURP

Intervention Type DEVICE

Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP)

Laser vs TURP

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Men undergoing surgery for BPH

Exclusion Criteria

* Previous prostate surgery
* Carcinoma of the prostate
* Neurogenic bladder
* Bladder carcinoma
Minimum Eligible Age

40 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Turku

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Tampere University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

South Ostrobothnia Health Care District

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Oulu University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Helsinki

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Hannu Koistinen

Urologist

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Hannu T Koistinen, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Helsinki University Central Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Helsinki University Hospital

Helsinki, , Finland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Finland

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

34/13/03/02/08

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id