Engaging Elderly People Living in Institutions in Eating Situations

NCT ID: NCT05239442

Last Updated: 2022-02-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

640 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-03-29

Study Completion Date

2023-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Several recent studies have revealed a significant under-consumption of food in hospitals and nursing homes. For instance, at the Dijon University Hospital, 8 out of 10 patients consume less than 80% of the meals served. This has two consequences: an increase in the risk of malnutrition (some patients leave the hospital in such a poor nutritional state that they must be re-hospitalized within six months) and significant food waste. At the heart of this problem, the taste of the food is the subject of frequent and recurrent complaints from users. Although the food industry widely uses sensory methods to adapt its products to the taste of consumers, these methods are rarely used by the organizations that provide meals to care institutions.

The objective is to establish "taste commissions" in the daily practice in institutions for the elderly (hospital, nursing home), in order to improve the organoleptic quality of the meals served according to the expectations and preferences of the users. The principle of this system is to allow the users to taste the dishes produced by the kitchen of the establishment and to transmit these evaluations to the cooks so that they can rework the recipes according to the users' feedback.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Under-consumption of Food

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Patients

Hospital Patients:

\- Person hospitalized in one of the following departments: endocrinology-diabetology, geriatric medicine, pulmonology, rheumatology, dermatology, infectious diseases, internal medicine, cardiology, as well as in the rehabilitation department

Group Type OTHER

Taste Commission

Intervention Type OTHER

Evaluation of the daily meal once a week:

Introduction on the different sensory dimensions of the food, hedonic rating for each component, indicate what pleases/what could be improved in the recipe.

Evaluation of the taste commissions

Intervention Type OTHER

At 0, 3, 6 months:

* Food intake measurement, satisfaction measurement, and food waste measurement performed on 2 days (same week but not necessarily consecutive)
* Assessment of nutritional status using the Mini-Nutritional Assessment (MNA)

Institutional staff

Person working in the establishment where the taste commissions have been in place for at least 3 months

Group Type OTHER

Entretien SWOT

Intervention Type OTHER

Individual semi-guided face-to-face interview with an experimenter. They will allow us to identify the positive and negative effects of the taste commissions in the establishment as well as the levers and difficulties encountered during the implementation of the taste commissions. These interviews will be recorded using an audio device (dictaphone). Their content will then be transcribed in full.

Residents

Patients residing in nursing home

Group Type OTHER

Taste Commission

Intervention Type OTHER

Evaluation of the daily meal once a week:

Introduction on the different sensory dimensions of the food, hedonic rating for each component, indicate what pleases/what could be improved in the recipe.

Evaluation of the taste commissions

Intervention Type OTHER

At 0, 3, 6 months:

* Food intake measurement, satisfaction measurement, and food waste measurement performed on 2 days (same week but not necessarily consecutive)
* Assessment of nutritional status using the Mini-Nutritional Assessment (MNA)

Entretien SWOT

Intervention Type OTHER

Individual semi-guided face-to-face interview with an experimenter. They will allow us to identify the positive and negative effects of the taste commissions in the establishment as well as the levers and difficulties encountered during the implementation of the taste commissions. These interviews will be recorded using an audio device (dictaphone). Their content will then be transcribed in full.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Taste Commission

Evaluation of the daily meal once a week:

Introduction on the different sensory dimensions of the food, hedonic rating for each component, indicate what pleases/what could be improved in the recipe.

Intervention Type OTHER

Evaluation of the taste commissions

At 0, 3, 6 months:

* Food intake measurement, satisfaction measurement, and food waste measurement performed on 2 days (same week but not necessarily consecutive)
* Assessment of nutritional status using the Mini-Nutritional Assessment (MNA)

Intervention Type OTHER

Entretien SWOT

Individual semi-guided face-to-face interview with an experimenter. They will allow us to identify the positive and negative effects of the taste commissions in the establishment as well as the levers and difficulties encountered during the implementation of the taste commissions. These interviews will be recorded using an audio device (dictaphone). Their content will then be transcribed in full.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Hospitalized patients:

* Person hospitalized in one of the following departments: the endocrinology-diabetology department, geriatric medicine, pulmonology, rheumatology, dermatology, infectious diseases, internal medicine, cardiology, as well as the rehabilitation department, which are departments with an average length of stay sufficient to perform the study
* Person aged ≥ 50 years (this choice was made because more than 60% of the hospitalized population is currently over 50 years old)
* Person having given their oral agreement
* Person with an oral diet and eating without assistance
* Person with a normal texture diet
* For taste commissions and SWOT interviews: person with sufficient cognitive status to answer questions in a questionnaire or interview (MMSE \> 21).

Residents in nursing home (EHPAD):

* Person residing in EHPAD
* Person aged ≥ 65 years
* Person having given oral consent
* Person who is orally fed and self-feeding
* Person with a normal texture diet
* For taste commissions and SWOT interviews: person with sufficient cognitive status to answer questions in a questionnaire or interview (MMSE \> 21).

Facility staff for SWOT interviews:

* Person who has worked at the facility where the taste commissions were implemented at least 3 months previously.
* Person who gave oral consent
* Person between the ages of 18 and 60

Exclusion Criteria

* Person at the end of life
* Person with an eating disorder
* Person with a significant chronic psychiatric disorder (psychosis, manic-depression).
* Person requiring enteral or parenteral nutrition.
* Person in a period of exclusion from a previous study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Chu Dijon Bourgogne

Dijon, , France

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Virginie VAN WYMELBEKE

Role: CONTACT

03 80 29 31 55

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Virginie VAN WYMELBEKE

Role: primary

03 80 29 31 55

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

VAN WYMELBEKE I-SITE 2017

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.