NutritionDay in Worldwide Hospitals: An International Audit and Registry on Nutrition and Outcome
NCT ID: NCT02820246
Last Updated: 2021-02-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
250000 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2006-01-31
2025-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The aim of this international cross-sectional multicentre audit and registry is to generate a risk and level of nutritional intervention profile for an individual unit/ward based on case-mix, nutrition care and available structures. This profile should give a snapshot on the relation of risk to resource allocation. The audit is unit centered. Each unit gets as a feedback anonymously its position compared with all other participating units. Risk adjustment for selected patient groups, social environments and structures is planned.
In conclusion this audit/registry will serve five distinct aims:
* Generate a precise map of the prevalence of malnutrition before admission and of decreased nutrient intake according to risk factors, medical specialty, organisational structures and countries.
* Increase in awareness for clinical nutrition in patients, caregiver and hospital managers.
* Enlarge and maintain a reference database for hospitalised patients
* Provide individual unit benchmarking
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Impact of Denutrition on the Hospital Length of Stay for Patients Undergoing Rehabilitation
NCT02913846
Dietitian-supported Meal-ordering and Systematic Nutritional Care
NCT07234669
Short- and Long-term Health Adverse Outcomes Associated With Nutrition Disorders and Nutrition Related Conditions in Hospitalized Older People
NCT05276752
Nutritional Status and Patient Characteristics Upon Length of Stay, Clinical Outcome, and Survival in Older Hospitalized Patients
NCT06946537
Assessment of Food Intake in Hospitalized Patients
NCT02463565
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The data collected consist of four parts:
1. Unit organisation and structures:
Structural information about the unit (one sheet / unit) to be filled by the unit supervising physician together with the nursing head.
2. Patient's demographics \& medical information:
Demographic profile, diagnostic category based on ICD 10 and nutritional interventions for all patients (one line / patient) to be filled by a responsible person from the medical staff. Oncological patients have an additional caregiver sheet to define precisely cancer stage and specific treatment.
3. Individual self-administered patient questionnaire:
Each patient should document her/his nutritional intake during the study period. In addition patients may be asked to fill a questionnaire about changes in nutritional habits and reasons for decreased nutritional intake from the patient's perspective. Oncological patients have an additional optional patient sheet to determine the specific nutritional problems and supportive treatments used.
4. Individual patient outcome:
hospital cohort: at hospital discharge or day 30, whatever comes first: date of unit discharge, date of hospital discharge, site of discharge and health status.
Participation rules:
1. A user needs to register to nutritionDay as a member to the nutritionDay network. Each may choose a personal user name. Each user needs to provide a valid email address. After responding to a validation email the user is registered with the chosen user name. User details are stored on a system that is not connected to the nutritionDay registry at any time. One user may serve as contact for several units and centers.
2. A user may order codes for participation for one or several centers and units. Access to the registry is only possible with a center code and unit code. These codes are selected from a list of random numbers.
Audit/registry recruitment plan:
Participation to the registry is voluntary. There is actually no participation fee. All necessary information can be obtained from a dedicated website (www.nutritionday.org). Participation can be promoted via international and national scientific societies, universities, health care organisations or governmental agencies as well as via advertisement at international and national congresses. The target would be all types of hospital wards within hospitals of different sizes and level of care.
Risk and benefit assessment:
The benefit for each patient is that awareness and knowledge about nutrition related factors and treatment options in the treating unit is increased. There is no individual risk since the audit is purely observational.
The benefit for the individual unit is to receive an extensive benchmarking report displaying the unit data in comparison with all units from the same specialty from the previous 3 years immediately after the end of data entry and a validation step. Units or groups of units may request specific reports that can be obtained only after a case by case agreement and financial coverage. All data used as a reference for benchmarking purpose are from units where a minimum of 60% of actually present patients have been recruited and the outcome at day 30 is available in more than 80% of these patients. There is no risk for the unit since anonymity of unit is structurally strictly maintained.
The benefit for the registry up-to-date data enabling benchmarking in pace with medical and care evolution. Moreover the registry data are used for research of the scientific community.
The aim is to recruit a minimum of 10-50 units with 20-30 beds per participating country. A minimum of 10 units per medical specialty will be necessary to allow specialty adjustment.
Data security:
On the datasheets the unit and the hospital/center are identified by a numeric code delivered after application to the nutritionDay coordinating center by an automatic system. The only requirement is a valid email address for direct communication with the unit.
Patients are usually identified on the locally used questionnaires by initials and age, but use of initials is not mandatory. Consecutive numbering is also possible. Only the participating unit has to trace patients identifier to be able to collect hospital outcome at day 30 after nutritionDay and to answer automatic requests for data clarification during the data quality feedback.
During data entry into the electronic registry only anonymous codes for center, unit and patients are possible. Thus the data handling centre cannot trace data back to an individual patient. The access to data entry is protected by anonymous center-code and unit-code.
Typically all data are collected via a dedicated website accessed via www.nutritionday.org .
The protected data server is run by the Center for Medical Statistics Informatics and Intelligent Systems (CEMSIS) of the Medical University Vienna. The data server is mirrored and backed up. The data server is protected within the University Firewall against external access.
Data feedback and individual unit report
All participating units are entitled to receive a bench-marking report from the registry. The report generator is started by the participating unit, when data entry has been completed. As a first step each unit receives a data feedback sheet that is based on an electronic data plausibility and missing data analysis. After stating that all data are correctly entered the final report can be generated. This final report offers complete descriptive statistics of the unit data compared to the reference data from the previous 4 years of the corresponding specialty. Only data from units fulfilling a high data quality standard are used for the reference. More than 60% of the patients present in the unit need to participate and 80% of these patients need to have their outcome recorded. Optionally the period used for comparison can be extended until 2006. All descriptive statistics represent prevalent data and are not corrected for cross-sectional sampling to allow direct data control and interpretation.
All downloaded reports of a unit are consecutively numbered and stored for documentation purpose.
Data analysis and modelling:
The first aim of the project is to serve local specialty specific and up-to-date benchmarking with regard nutrition and feeding status , risk profile and nutrition care. Given the typical cross-sectional sample of 20-30 patients frequent risk factors can be easily compared because such risk factors as recent weight loss or less than normal eating are observed in one third to half of the patients.
The second aim is scientific data analysis. The actual research questions are:
* Identifying the risk factors associated with decreased eating.
* Analysing the impact of risk factors for increased length of hospital stay
* Analysing time-trends in risk profile and nutrition care
* Analysing the economic impact of nutrition risk factors on the health care system
* Updating the PANDORA score if major change in performance is identified
The actual database includes 103 920 patients for the period 2006-2012 and allow the following precision for estimating the prevalence of risk factors:
Risk factor prevalence 1% precision as 95% CI 0.93-1.07%
Risk factor prevalence 5% precision as 95% CI 4.87-5.14%
Risk factor prevalence 10% precision as 95% CI 9.81-10.19%
Risk factor prevalence 20% precision as 95% CI 19.75-20.25%
Risk factor prevalence 30% precision as 95% CI 29.72-30.29%
Risk factor prevalence 40% precision as 95% CI 39.70-40.30%
Given the typical participation of 12 000-20 000 patients annually, the investigators expect to have a sufficiently precise database for benchmarking, when using the last 4 years data.
For the scientific data analysis the investigators use COX-regression or general linear model with proper weighting of observations to account for the effect of cross-sectional sampling for events such as discharge or death and linear regression models to analyse length of stay. Whenever several events can occur in a patient a competing risk analysis is performed.
All data analysis will be done at the Dept. for Medical Statistics, Medical University Vienna. After publication of the multinational results, all national datasets will be available for national publication based on a research plan, if the number of wards is large enough to ensure anonymity for the individual ward within the country.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
hospitalised patients
all patients present in a hospital ward during the morning shift
nutrition
type and amount of food eaten or type of oral nutritional supplements as well as enteral or parenteral nutrition
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
nutrition
type and amount of food eaten or type of oral nutritional supplements as well as enteral or parenteral nutrition
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Questionnaire especially dedicated to children and young adults are provided for patients aged 7-17. Questionnaires for children can be completed by the patients themselves or by a legal guardian.
* Patients may accept to participate only for the medical documentation part from the caregiver sheet (sheet 2) and individual patient outcome (sheet 4), but refuse to fill the individual patient questionnaire (sheet 3).
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients unable to understand and answer questions because none of the 31 available languages is understood for the hospital cohort.
* Patient's refusal to answer the patient specific questionnaire or refusal of medical data use for auditing and research.
* Patients admitted and discharged during the same calendar day.
6 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism
OTHER
Austrian Society for Clinical Nutrition
OTHER
Medical University of Vienna
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Michael J. Hiesmayr
Professor of Anesthesia and Intensive Care
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Michael J Hiesmayr, MD, MSc
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Medical University of Vienna
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Medical University Vienna, CEMSIIS
Vienna, , Austria
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Frantal S, Pernicka E, Hiesmayr M, Schindler K, Bauer P. Length bias correction in one-day cross-sectional assessments - The nutritionDay study. Clin Nutr. 2016 Apr;35(2):522-527. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2015.03.019. Epub 2015 Apr 7.
Hiesmayr M, Schindler K, Pernicka E, Schuh C, Schoeniger-Hekele A, Bauer P, Laviano A, Lovell AD, Mouhieddine M, Schuetz T, Schneider SM, Singer P, Pichard C, Howard P, Jonkers C, Grecu I, Ljungqvist O; NutritionDay Audit Team. Decreased food intake is a risk factor for mortality in hospitalised patients: the NutritionDay survey 2006. Clin Nutr. 2009 Oct;28(5):484-91. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2009.05.013. Epub 2009 Jul 1.
Schindler K, Pernicka E, Laviano A, Howard P, Schutz T, Bauer P, Grecu I, Jonkers C, Kondrup J, Ljungqvist O, Mouhieddine M, Pichard C, Singer P, Schneider S, Schuh C, Hiesmayr M; NutritionDay Audit Team. How nutritional risk is assessed and managed in European hospitals: a survey of 21,007 patients findings from the 2007-2008 cross-sectional nutritionDay survey. Clin Nutr. 2010 Oct;29(5):552-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2010.04.001.
Lainscak M, Farkas J, Frantal S, Singer P, Bauer P, Hiesmayr M, Schindler K. Self-rated health, nutritional intake and mortality in adult hospitalized patients. Eur J Clin Invest. 2014 Sep;44(9):813-24. doi: 10.1111/eci.12300.
Hiesmayr M, Frantal S, Schindler K, Themessl-Huber M, Mouhieddine M, Schuh C, Pernicka E, Schneider S, Singer P, Ljunqvist O, Pichard C, Laviano A, Kosak S, Bauer P. The Patient- And Nutrition-Derived Outcome Risk Assessment Score (PANDORA): Development of a Simple Predictive Risk Score for 30-Day In-Hospital Mortality Based on Demographics, Clinical Observation, and Nutrition. PLoS One. 2015 May 22;10(5):e0127316. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127316. eCollection 2015.
Cereda E, Klersy C, Hiesmayr M, Schindler K, Singer P, Laviano A, Caccialanza R; NutritionDay Survey Collaborators. Body mass index, age and in-hospital mortality: The NutritionDay multinational survey. Clin Nutr. 2017 Jun;36(3):839-847. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2016.05.001. Epub 2016 May 15.
Moick S, Hiesmayr M, Mouhieddine M, Kiss N, Bauer P, Sulz I, Singer P, Simon J. Reducing the knowledge to action gap in hospital nutrition care - Developing and implementing nutritionDay 2.0. Clin Nutr. 2021 Mar;40(3):936-945. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2020.06.021. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
Moick S, Simon J, Hiesmayr M. Nutrition care quality indicators in hospitals and nursing homes: A systematic literature review and critical appraisal of current evidence. Clin Nutr. 2020 Jun;39(6):1667-1680. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2019.07.025. Epub 2019 Aug 7.
Schindler K, Themessl-Huber M, Hiesmayr M, Kosak S, Lainscak M, Laviano A, Ljungqvist O, Mouhieddine M, Schneider S, de van der Schueren M, Schutz T, Schuh C, Singer P, Bauer P, Pichard C. To eat or not to eat? Indicators for reduced food intake in 91,245 patients hospitalized on nutritionDays 2006-2014 in 56 countries worldwide: a descriptive analysis. Am J Clin Nutr. 2016 Nov;104(5):1393-1402. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.116.137125. Epub 2016 Oct 12.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
official registry website
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
407/2005
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.