sFlt-1/PlGF Ratio: Impact on the Management of Patients With Suspected Pre-eclampsia
NCT ID: NCT05228002
Last Updated: 2025-09-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
43 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-05-23
2025-03-03
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Pre-eclampsia therefore remains difficult to diagnose and to prognose. The diagnosis of pre-eclampsia based on blood pressure and proteinuria has a predictive value of 30% for adverse outcomes related to pre-eclampsia.
In recent years, new biomarkers have been studied: PlGF, a placental growth factor, and sFlt-1, the free fraction of its membrane receptor.The pathophysiology and specificity of these biomarkers, but especially their ratio, has been widely studied and demonstrated in the diagnosis and prognosis of preeclampsia.
Nevertheless, few studies have analyzed the impact of this report on the hospitalization of patients, except mainly a German study which showed a change in the decision to hospitalize in 16.9% of cases. On the other hand, no French study has been carried out on this subject. Finally, no professional recommendation fully integrates or clearly frames the use of the ratio in current practice. Its use therefore remains disparate between countries, but also within the same country, as in France, where few centers use it.
The decision to hospitalize a patient with suspected preeclampsia depends on the organization of the health care system. It therefore seems interesting to analyze the precise impact on hospitalizations of the use of a diagnostic and prognostic tool such as the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio with the specificities of the French health system, which favors outpatient management.The study would evaluate the use of this promising tool in the daily management of parturients, paving the way for the development of simple recommendations applicable in the various French maternity hospitals.
The hypothesis is that the use of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio in patients with suspected pre-eclampsia would reduce the rate of hospitalization.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Impact of the sFlt-1/PlGF Ratio on Medical Decision-making and on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in Women Suspected of Preeclampsia
NCT06314555
Preeclampsia Ratio (sFlt-1/PlGF)
NCT03289611
IMPACT OF THE BIOLOGICAL RATIO ON MEDICAL DECISION MAKING IN WOMEN SUSPECTED OF PREECLAMPSIA
NCT06224946
Evaluation of the Serum Markers sFLt1 and PlGF for the Prediction of the Complications of the Placental Vascular Pathologies in the 3rd Quarter of the Pregnancy.
NCT03455387
Perinatal Outcomes in Patients With Elevated sFlt-1/PlGF Ratio
NCT06403722
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Standard
The monitoring criteria used will be the same as those usually used at the Nice University Hospital, according to the protocol of the department.
For patients in the "standard" group, the biomarker results will be masked and then revealed afterwards for statistical analysis.
sFlt-1/PlGF ratio - Active Comparator: Standard
Blood test for biomarkers (sFlt-1/PlGF ratio) For patients in the "standard" group, the biomarker results will be masked and then revealed afterwards for statistical analysis.
For the "biomarkers" group, the monitoring decision will be made based on the ratio calculation
Biomarkers
The monitoring decision will be made based on the ratio calculation:
Ratio \< 38: "Classic" monitoring with one prenatal visit per month 38 ≤ Ratio ≤ 85: Close outpatient monitoring Ratio \> 85: Inpatient monitoring in Pathological Pregnancy
sFlt-1/PlGF ratio - Experimental: Biomarkers
Blood test for biomarkers (sFlt-1/PlGF ratio) For patients in the "standard" group, the biomarker results will be masked and then revealed afterwards for statistical analysis.
For the "biomarkers" group, the monitoring decision will be made based on the ratio calculation.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
sFlt-1/PlGF ratio - Active Comparator: Standard
Blood test for biomarkers (sFlt-1/PlGF ratio) For patients in the "standard" group, the biomarker results will be masked and then revealed afterwards for statistical analysis.
For the "biomarkers" group, the monitoring decision will be made based on the ratio calculation
sFlt-1/PlGF ratio - Experimental: Biomarkers
Blood test for biomarkers (sFlt-1/PlGF ratio) For patients in the "standard" group, the biomarker results will be masked and then revealed afterwards for statistical analysis.
For the "biomarkers" group, the monitoring decision will be made based on the ratio calculation.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Affiliated to the Social Security
* Signature of informed consent
* Term \> 24 week of amenorrhea and \< 37 week of amenorrhea
* Single criterion among the following: (only one box below must be ticked to allow inclusion):
* de novo hypertension (PAS ≥ 140 mmHg and/or PAD ≥ 90 mmHg) ;
* worsening of pre-existing hypertension \>10 mmHg (on PAS or PAD ) ;
* worsening of pre-existing proteinuria;
* Excessive edema AND significant weight gain (minimum 2kg/week);
* Headache AND another clinical sign (edema, rapid weight gain);
* Visual disturbances (phosphenes and/or visual blur) AND/OR tinnitus;
* Sudden weight gain (\> 1kg/week during the 3rd trimester);
* Low platelet count (thrombocytopenia \< 150 G/L);
* Hepatic cytolysis (ASAT and/or ALAT \> 2N) without associated pruritus or jaundice;
* Suspicion of intrauterine growth retardation on obstetric ultrasound, with no other cause found (no hypertension or proteinuria, no clinical or biological signs of pre-eclampsia) and no abnormal fetal dopplers.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patient with poor clinical tolerance of hypertension and/or need for immediate introduction of intravenous antihypertensive therapy
* Patient with a specific complication of pre-eclampsia requiring immediate management at the time of inclusion: in utero fetal death, retroplacental hematoma, disseminated intravascular coagulation or emergency cesarean section.
* Association of at least 2 of the following criteria:
* De novo proteinuria (24h proteinuria ≥ 0.3 g/24h or P/C ratio ≥ 0.3) or worsening of pre- existing proteinuria;
* Criteria for clinical suspicion of pre-eclampsia: epigastric pain, excessive edema, headaches, visual disturbances, sudden weight gain (\> 1kg/week in the 3rd trimester);
* Biological signs associated with pre-eclampsia: low platelet count (thrombocytopenia \< 150 G/L), hepatic cytolysis (ASAT and/or ALAT \> 2N);
* Suspicion of intrauterine growth retardation on obstetrical ultrasound, with no other cause found.
A combination of at least 2 of these criteria raises the suspicion of pre-eclampsia, and, according to the new CNGOF recommendations of 2024, requires systematic initial hospitalization.
\- Vulnerable person requiring enhanced protection, i.e., relatively (or totally) unable to protect their own interests. Specifically, the person's power, intelligence, education, resources, strength, or other attributes necessary to protect his or her own interests may be inadequate (e.g., persons deprived of liberty, minors, persons under guardianship, persons with mental or emotional disabilities in the broadest sense of the word, illiterate persons, refugees and asylum seekers, alcoholics and drug addicts, etc.)
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Julie ANTOMARCHI
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Nice University Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Nice University Hospital
Nice, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
19-AOI-02
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.