Preeclampsia Ratio (sFlt-1/PlGF)

NCT ID: NCT03289611

Last Updated: 2025-11-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

84 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-04-26

Study Completion Date

2020-08-27

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of the PRECOG study is to determine in a prospective interventional randomized study whether the implementation of a predictive test based on the sFLT-1/PlGF ratio improves perinatal care and reduces costs, in patients with suspected preeclampsia before 35 weeks of gestation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Preeclampsia is a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy associated with placental insufficiency and is one of the major important of prematurity and maternal mortality worldwide. It complicates 2 to 7% of pregnancies. It is currently considered that preeclampsia is associated with maternal endothelial dysfunction induced by the release into the maternal circulation of excess placental factors (such as sFLT-1 a soluble receptor for VEGF and PlGF). There is currently no curative treatment, and only childbirth and delivery of the placenta alleviate the mother's symptoms. Moreover, the evolution from case with mild symptoms to a severe case of preeclampsia is often is often rapid and difficult to anticipate. Therefore, it is recommended to manage patients with preeclampsia in hospital and cases of suspected preeclampsia are usually admitted in prenatal units. Each year thousands of patients are hospitalized for surveillance and blood/urine analysis to rule out the diagnosis of preeclampsia. A biological test to predict preeclampsia would therefore be of particular interest in order to:

* identify patients without preeclampsia and therefore void costs and iatrogenic complications related to unnecessary hospitalization
* identify patients at high risk of maternal and perinatal complications in order to anticipate in utero transfer, optimize maternal and fetal surveillance and administrate steroids.

It has recently been demonstrated that sFLT-1 and PlGF have a high predictive value for the diagnosis and the prediction of preeclampsia, but the interest of introducing these markers in clinical practice has not been demonstrated yet. The diagnostic and predictive value of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio in patients at risk of placenta-related disorders has been shown in the recent literature and estimation of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio has become an additional tool in the management of these disorders, primarily PE. This ratio can distinguish the patients that develop maternal or perinatal complications in the next 7-14 days from those with uncomplicated pregnancy. Women with an sFlt-1/PlGF ratio\<38 do not have PE at the time of the test and in all likelihood will not develop PE for at least 1week; it is thereby of great value for reassuring the clinician and the patient. Up to 80% of patients are supposed to be in this patient group; therefore, clinicians are able to exclude the majority of patients and focus on those who need more attention and care. On contrary women with a sFlt-1/PlGF ratio \> 38 and more specifically those with a ratio over 85 are highly likely to develop preeclampsia and should be managed according to local practice/guidelines. Thus the use of such predictive tool appear very promising but its interest has not been demonstrated in prospective intervention studies.

The aim of the PRECOG study is to determine in a prospective interventional randomized study whether the implementation of a predictive test based on the sFLT-1/PlGF ratio improves perinatal care and reduces costs, in patients with suspected preeclampsia before 35 WG. costs, in patients with suspected preeclampsia before 35 WG.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Preeclampsia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control

Usual management

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Experimental

Ambulatory management if sFlt-1 / PlGF ratio is below 38 Usual management if sFlt-1/PlGF is between 38 and 85. If the ratio is \> 85, monitoring will be intensified and patient hospitalization will be continued

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

sFlt-1 / PlGF ratio

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

* Ambulatory management if sFlt-1 / PlGF ratio is below 38
* usual management if sFlt-1/PlGF is between 38 and 85.
* If the ratio is \> 85, monitoring will be intensified and patient hospitalization will be continued

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

sFlt-1 / PlGF ratio

* Ambulatory management if sFlt-1 / PlGF ratio is below 38
* usual management if sFlt-1/PlGF is between 38 and 85.
* If the ratio is \> 85, monitoring will be intensified and patient hospitalization will be continued

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Patient hospitalized for suspected preeclampsia between 24WG+ 0 days and 35WG + 6 days,

Patiente with at least one of the following criteria:

* Arterial hypertension defined by systolic BP ≥ 140 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mm Hg
* Proteinuria greater than 0.3g / 24h or 0.3g / l or ≥ 3+
* Proteinuria / creatinine ratio ≥ 30 mg / mmol
* Pain in the epigastric bar
* Generalized edema
* Hepatic cytolysis\> 1.5N
* Thrombocytopenia \<150000 / mm3 Informed consent signed by both parties Non-opposition was accepted by parental authority Age ≥ 18 years

Exclusion Criteria

Diagnosis of preeclampsia (arterial pressure\> 140/90 and proteinuria\> 0.3g / 24h or urine test\> 3+) or complete HELLP syndrome (Platelets \<100000 / mm3 and SGOT\> 2N and LDH and collapsed Haptoglobin)

IUGR with absent or reverse diastolic umbilical flow

Fetal heart rate abnormalities

Gestational age \<24 WG and\> 35 WG

Multiple pregnancy

Patient without health insurance

Non-consent of patient

Minor patient

Congenital malformation
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

URC-CIC Paris Descartes Necker Cochin

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jean GUIBOURDENCHE, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CHU Cochin, Maternité Port Royal

Paris, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Tsatsaris V, Goffin F, Munaut C, Brichant JF, Pignon MR, Noel A, Schaaps JP, Cabrol D, Frankenne F, Foidart JM. Overexpression of the soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor in preeclamptic patients: pathophysiological consequences. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003 Nov;88(11):5555-63. doi: 10.1210/jc.2003-030528.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14602804 (View on PubMed)

Sibiude J, Guibourdenche J, Dionne MD, Le Ray C, Anselem O, Serreau R, Goffinet F, Tsatsaris V. Placental growth factor for the prediction of adverse outcomes in patients with suspected preeclampsia or intrauterine growth restriction. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e50208. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050208. Epub 2012 Nov 28.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23209675 (View on PubMed)

Zeisler H, Llurba E, Chantraine F, Vatish M, Staff AC, Sennstrom M, Olovsson M, Brennecke SP, Stepan H, Allegranza D, Dilba P, Schoedl M, Hund M, Verlohren S. Predictive Value of the sFlt-1:PlGF Ratio in Women with Suspected Preeclampsia. N Engl J Med. 2016 Jan 7;374(1):13-22. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1414838.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26735990 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

P161101

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.