Buffered vs. Unbuffered Local Anesthesia in Mandibular Molars Diagnosed With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis

NCT ID: NCT05227300

Last Updated: 2024-05-14

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-02-14

Study Completion Date

2022-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether one type of anesthetic (numbing medicine) will work better at numbing the nerve in a tooth than using a different type of anesthetic. A second purpose is to see if the time needed to numb the nerve in a tooth is different between the two anesthetics.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

40 subjects with a mandibular molar diagnosed with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis will be randomly allocated into 2 groups. One group will receive a total of 3 cartridges of a standard, unbuffered 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine via inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) followed by supplemental buccal and lingual infiltrations, while the other will receive the equivalent yet buffered formulation. An electronic pulp tester (EPT) will be used to objectively determine baseline pulpal status of the affected tooth, followed by 2-minute interval testing following the administration of all local anesthesia. The onset of pulpal anesthesia is defined by the first of 2 consecutive EPT=80 readings, and the endodontic treatment may begin. Profound pulpal anesthesia is ultimately determined if the patients report a comfortable pulpotomy as reflected on the Wong-Baker FACES Visual Analog Scale.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

This study will be a single-center, controlled, randomized, double-blind (provider and subject), 2 treatment, 1 period, parallel study
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators
A statistician will provide a two-product randomization scheme which will randomize each of the 40 subjects on the order of their entry into the study. The research assistants will be aware of and document this scheme, but the student researcher/PI will not know what type of anesthetic will be administered.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Buffered 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine

Buffered local anesthetic (addition of sodium bicarbonate to make a 10% buffered solution)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Onset Sodium Bicarbonate Inj., 8.4%, USP Neutralizing Additive Solution

Intervention Type DRUG

Onpharma's Onset sodium bicarbonate buffer to be added to a standard cartridge of dental local anesthetic

2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine

Intervention Type DRUG

Septodont's standard formulation of 2% lidocaine with epinephrine

Unbuffered 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine

Standard local anesthetic

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine

Intervention Type DRUG

Septodont's standard formulation of 2% lidocaine with epinephrine

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Onset Sodium Bicarbonate Inj., 8.4%, USP Neutralizing Additive Solution

Onpharma's Onset sodium bicarbonate buffer to be added to a standard cartridge of dental local anesthetic

Intervention Type DRUG

2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine

Septodont's standard formulation of 2% lidocaine with epinephrine

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Be between the ages of 18 and 80 years old
* Have the ability and willingness to independently consent to treatment and study participation
* Have an uncomplicated medical history (ASA I and II)
* Not be pregnant
* Have no allergies local anesthetics/sulfites (confirmed or self-reported)
* Not be taking any medications that may affect the proper assessment of the anesthetic (no acetaminophen or short-acting NSAIDs such as ibuprofen within the previous 6 hours; no long-acting NSAIDs such as naproxen within the previous 16 hours)
* Not require nitrous oxide during treatment, and the injection area should appear healthy with no other pre-existing conditions or infections that may compromise an accurate collection of data
* Be experiencing signs of irreversible pulpitis (an exaggerated response to cold that lingers longer than 10 seconds) in a mandibular molar at the time of conducting the study

Exclusion Criteria

* A negative response to cold in the proposed treatment tooth
* A radiographic periradicular pathosis more advanced than a widened periodontal ligament or have an intraoral swelling
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Indiana University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Kenneth J. Spolnik DDS

Department of Endodontics Chair

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Indiana University School of Dentistry Graduate Endodontics Dept.

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Rosenberg PA, Amin KG, Zibari Y, Lin LM. Comparison of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine when used as a supplemental anesthetic. J Endod. 2007 Apr;33(4):403-5. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2006.11.019. Epub 2007 Feb 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17368327 (View on PubMed)

Goodis HE, Poon A, Hargreaves KM. Tissue pH and temperature regulate pulpal nociceptors. J Dent Res. 2006 Nov;85(11):1046-9. doi: 10.1177/154405910608501114.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17062748 (View on PubMed)

Christoph RA, Buchanan L, Begalla K, Schwartz S. Pain reduction in local anesthetic administration through pH buffering. Ann Emerg Med. 1988 Feb;17(2):117-20. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(88)80293-2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 2827545 (View on PubMed)

Schellenberg J, Drum M, Reader A, Nusstein J, Fowler S, Beck M. Effect of Buffered 4% Lidocaine on the Success of the Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Patients with Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Study. J Endod. 2015 Jun;41(6):791-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.02.022. Epub 2015 Apr 1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25841959 (View on PubMed)

Saatchi M, Farhad AR, Shenasa N, Haghighi SK. Effect of Sodium Bicarbonate Buccal Infiltration on the Success of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Mandibular First Molars with Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis: A Prospective, Randomized Double-blind Study. J Endod. 2016 Oct;42(10):1458-61. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.07.004. Epub 2016 Aug 6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27507627 (View on PubMed)

Fowler S, Reader A. Is a volume of 3.6 mL better than 1.8 mL for inferior alveolar nerve blocks in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis? J Endod. 2013 Aug;39(8):970-2. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.04.007. Epub 2013 May 16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23880260 (View on PubMed)

Kanaa MD, Whitworth JM, Meechan JG. A prospective randomized trial of different supplementary local anesthetic techniques after failure of inferior alveolar nerve block in patients with irreversible pulpitis in mandibular teeth. J Endod. 2012 Apr;38(4):421-5. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.12.006. Epub 2012 Feb 2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22414822 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

11447

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Buffered Local Anesthetic
NCT05757648 COMPLETED PHASE4