The Efficacy of Analgesic Buffering With Sodium Bicarbonate for the Pediatric Dental Patient
NCT ID: NCT01883232
Last Updated: 2015-12-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
NA
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-08-31
2016-02-29
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine
2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine
2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine
2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine administered with a syringe prior to the procedure
Onset Mixing Pen by Onpharma
Sodium Bicarbonate 8.4% mixed with the onset mixing pen
Onset Mixing Pen by Onpharma
Sodium Bicarbonate 8.4%
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Onset Mixing Pen by Onpharma
Sodium Bicarbonate 8.4%
2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine
2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine administered with a syringe prior to the procedure
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Existence of carious primary molars necessitating administration of an anesthetic agent
* No history of post traumatic stress disorder or specific phobia related to a dental setting
* No allergic reaction to lidocaine
* Patient's between the ages of 5 to 12.
Exclusion Criteria
* History of significant medical conditions
* Taking any medications that may affect anesthetic assessment
* Active sites of pathology in areas if injection
* Outside the age range of 5 -12.
5 Years
12 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Colorado, Denver
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Valerie Esker, DMD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Children's Hospital Colorado Dental Clinic
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Children's Hospital Colorado Dental Clinic
Aurora, Colorado, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kashyap VM, Desai R, Reddy PB, Menon S. Effect of alkalinisation of lignocaine for intraoral nerve block on pain during injection, and speed of onset of anaesthesia. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Dec;49(8):e72-5. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2011.04.068. Epub 2011 May 18.
Grassick P. The fear behind the fear: a case study of apparent simple injection phobia. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 1990 Dec;21(4):281-7. doi: 10.1016/0005-7916(90)90030-o.
Arndt KA, Burton C, Noe JM. Minimizing the pain of local anesthesia. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1983 Nov;72(5):676-9. doi: 10.1097/00006534-198311000-00017.
Meit SS, Yasek V, Shannon CK, Hickman D, Williams D. Techniques for reducing anesthetic injection pain: an interdisciplinary survey of knowledge and application. J Am Dent Assoc. 2004 Sep;135(9):1243-50. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2004.0399.
Burns CA, Ferris G, Feng C, Cooper JZ, Brown MD. Decreasing the pain of local anesthesia: a prospective, double-blind comparison of buffered, premixed 1% lidocaine with epinephrine versus 1% lidocaine freshly mixed with epinephrine. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006 Jan;54(1):128-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2005.06.043.
Reed KL, Malamed SF, Fonner AM. Local anesthesia part 2: technical considerations. Anesth Prog. 2012 Fall;59(3):127-36; quiz 137. doi: 10.2344/0003-3006-59.3.127.
Malamed SF, Falkel M. Advances in local anesthetics: pH buffering and dissolved CO2. Dent Today. 2012 May;31(5):88-93; quiz 94-5. No abstract available.
Christoph RA, Buchanan L, Begalla K, Schwartz S. Pain reduction in local anesthetic administration through pH buffering. Ann Emerg Med. 1988 Feb;17(2):117-20. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(88)80293-2.
Aminabadi NA, Farahani RM, Balayi Gajan E. The efficacy of distraction and counterstimulation in the reduction of pain reaction to intraoral injection by pediatric patients. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2008 Sep 1;9(6):33-40.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
13-0298
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id