Combination of Buffered Anesthetic to Treat Mandibular Molars
NCT ID: NCT06047366
Last Updated: 2025-05-13
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE4
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-12-05
2024-05-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Buffered vs. Unbuffered Local Anesthesia in Mandibular Molars Diagnosed With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis
NCT05227300
Effect of Sodium Bicarbonate Buffered Lidocaine on the Success of IAN Block of Teeth With Irreversible Pulpitis
NCT02226913
Efficacy of Two Local Anesthetics on Quality of Life After Endodontic Treatment
NCT04787731
Buffered Anesthetic Solution in the Treatment of Mandibular Primary Molars
NCT05793905
Anesthetic Efficacy of Articaine and Lidocaine in Lower Molars With Irreversible Pulpits
NCT01912755
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Buffered
Buffered 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine Buffered 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine Buffered 3% mepivacaine Buffered local anesthetic (addition of sodium bicarbonate to make a 10% buffered solution)
Sodium bicarbonate
Onpharma's Onset sodium bicarbonate buffer to be added to a standard cartridge of dental local anesthetic
Lidocaine w/ epi
Septodont's standard formulation of 2% lidocaine with epinephrine
Articaine w/ epi
Septodont's standard formulation of 4% articaine with epinephrine
Mepivacaine plain
Septodont's standard formulation of 3% mepivacaine
Unbuffered
Unbuffered 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine Unbuffered 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine Unbuffered 3% mepivacaine Standard local anesthetics
Lidocaine w/ epi
Septodont's standard formulation of 2% lidocaine with epinephrine
Articaine w/ epi
Septodont's standard formulation of 4% articaine with epinephrine
Mepivacaine plain
Septodont's standard formulation of 3% mepivacaine
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Sodium bicarbonate
Onpharma's Onset sodium bicarbonate buffer to be added to a standard cartridge of dental local anesthetic
Lidocaine w/ epi
Septodont's standard formulation of 2% lidocaine with epinephrine
Articaine w/ epi
Septodont's standard formulation of 4% articaine with epinephrine
Mepivacaine plain
Septodont's standard formulation of 3% mepivacaine
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Have the ability and willingness to independently consent to treatment and study participation
* Have an uncomplicated medical history (ASA I and II)
* Not be pregnant
* Have no allergies local anesthetics/sulfites (confirmed or self-reported)
* Not be taking any medications that may affect the proper assessment of the anesthetic (no acetaminophen or short-acting NSAIDs such as ibuprofen within the previous 6 hours; no long-acting NSAIDs such as naproxen within the previous 16 hours)
* Not require nitrous oxide during treatment, and the injection area should appear healthy with no other pre-existing conditions or infections that may compromise an accurate collection of data
* Be experiencing signs of irreversible pulpitis (an exaggerated response to cold that lingers longer than 10 seconds) in a mandibular molar at the time of conducting the study
Exclusion Criteria
* A radiographic periradicular pathosis more advanced than a widened periodontal ligament or have an intraoral swelling
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Indiana University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Kenneth J. Spolnik DDS
Department of Endodontics Chair
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Kenneth Spolnik, DDS
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Program Director
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
ndiana University School of Dentistry Graduate Endodontics Dept.
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Rosenberg PA, Amin KG, Zibari Y, Lin LM. Comparison of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine when used as a supplemental anesthetic. J Endod. 2007 Apr;33(4):403-5. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2006.11.019. Epub 2007 Feb 20.
Goodis HE, Poon A, Hargreaves KM. Tissue pH and temperature regulate pulpal nociceptors. J Dent Res. 2006 Nov;85(11):1046-9. doi: 10.1177/154405910608501114.
Christoph RA, Buchanan L, Begalla K, Schwartz S. Pain reduction in local anesthetic administration through pH buffering. Ann Emerg Med. 1988 Feb;17(2):117-20. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(88)80293-2.
Schellenberg J, Drum M, Reader A, Nusstein J, Fowler S, Beck M. Effect of Buffered 4% Lidocaine on the Success of the Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Patients with Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Study. J Endod. 2015 Jun;41(6):791-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.02.022. Epub 2015 Apr 1.
Saatchi M, Farhad AR, Shenasa N, Haghighi SK. Effect of Sodium Bicarbonate Buccal Infiltration on the Success of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Mandibular First Molars with Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis: A Prospective, Randomized Double-blind Study. J Endod. 2016 Oct;42(10):1458-61. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.07.004. Epub 2016 Aug 6.
Fowler S, Reader A. Is a volume of 3.6 mL better than 1.8 mL for inferior alveolar nerve blocks in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis? J Endod. 2013 Aug;39(8):970-2. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.04.007. Epub 2013 May 16.
Kanaa MD, Whitworth JM, Meechan JG. A prospective randomized trial of different supplementary local anesthetic techniques after failure of inferior alveolar nerve block in patients with irreversible pulpitis in mandibular teeth. J Endod. 2012 Apr;38(4):421-5. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.12.006. Epub 2012 Feb 2.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
17799
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.