Comparative Evaluation of Pulpal Anaesthetic Efficacy of Different Anaesthetic Solutions for Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Patients With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis

NCT ID: NCT05239078

Last Updated: 2022-02-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

120 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-03-01

Study Completion Date

2017-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Pulpal and periapical inflammation and infection can cause tissue pH in the affected region to be lowered which results in less penetration of anesthetic solution in the nerve membrane and hence delays the onset of anesthesia. So, the purpose of this study was to compare the pulpal anesthetic efficacy of lidocaine, articaine, mepivacaine for inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) in patients with irreversible pulpitis (IP). One hundred and twenty adult patients with IP concerning mandibular molars randomly received IANB with either of the three solutions: 2% lidocaine with epinephrine; 4% articaine with epinephrine; 3% plain mepivacaine. Pain during the endodontic treatment was assessed using a visual analog scale (Heft-Parker VAS). Endodontic treatment was initiated. Success was defined as no or mild pain (pain score≤54mm on Hp VAS) during access preparation and root canal instrumentation. The anesthetic success rates were analyzed with the chi-square test.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pulpitis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Inferior Alveolar nerve block with 2% lidocaine with epinephrine

An inferior alveolar nerve block was given with 2% lidocaine with epinephrine

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

local anaesthetic injection

Intervention Type DRUG

Inferior alveolar nerve block

Inferior Alveolar nerve block with 4% articaine with epinephrine

An inferior alveolar nerve block was given with 4% articaine with epinephrine

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

local anaesthetic injection

Intervention Type DRUG

Inferior alveolar nerve block

Inferior Alveolar nerve block with 3% plain mepivacaine

An inferior alveolar nerve block was given with 3% plain mepivacaine

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

local anaesthetic injection

Intervention Type DRUG

Inferior alveolar nerve block

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

local anaesthetic injection

Inferior alveolar nerve block

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* active pain in a mandibular molar
* prolonged response to cold testing with an ice stick and an electric pulp tester
* absence of any periapical radiolucency on radiographs, except for a widened periodontal ligament
* vital coronal pulp on access opening and ability to understand the use of pain scales

Exclusion Criteria

* known allergy, sensitivity, or contraindications to any opioid or nonopioid analgesic including aspirin or NSAIDs
* history of active peptic ulcer within the preceding 12 months
* history of bleeding problems or anticoagulant use within the last month
* patients who were pregnant or breast-feeding
* a history of known or suspected drug abuse
* patients who had taken NSAIDs within 12 h before administration of the study drugs
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

SGT DENTAL COLLEGE

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Dr. Vivek Aggarwal

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dr. Vivek Aggarwal

Professor

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SGTTHESIS

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.