EMLA Topical Anesthetic During Scaling and Root Planing

NCT ID: NCT01860235

Last Updated: 2013-05-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

32 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-06-30

Study Completion Date

2012-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Injectable anesthesics previous to subgingival scaling and root planing (SRP) presents some disadvantages like fear of the needle insertion, long-lasting effect and prolonged dampening of adjacent tissues. This study will compare the intrapocket anesthetic effectiveness of a skin topical anesthesic EMLA with intrapocket 2% benzocaine, intrapocket placebo and injectable anaesthesia for SRP in a Split-mouth, double-blind, clinical trial study.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the effect of a eutectic mixture containing 25 mg/g of lidocaine and 25 mg/g of prilocaine (EMLA®) with injectable 2% lidocaine, topical benzocaine, and 2% placebo for reducing pain during subgingival scaling and root planing (SRP) procedures.

Methods: Thirty-two patients were enrolled in this split-mouth, double-blind randomized clinical trial. Patients were randomized to a sequence of four anesthetics: 25 mg/g lidocaine and 25 mg/g of 5% prilocaine (EMLA®), injectable 2% lidocaine, topical 2% benzocaine, or placebo. Pain and discomfort were measured using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Verbal Scale (VS). Patient satisfaction with anesthesia was also determined at the end of each treatment session.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Local Anesthesia Pain, Postoperative Self-Perception

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

sextant 1

Treatment with subgingival scaling and root planing was done in 6 weekly sessions, being the sextant 1 in the randomization for experimental procedures (EMLA)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

EMLA

Intervention Type DRUG

% eutectic mixture of 25mg/g lidocaine and 25 mg/g of prilocaine

sextant 2

Treatment with subgingival scaling and root planing was done in 6 weekly sessions, being the sextant 1 in the randomization for experimental procedures (Injectable anesthesia)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Injectable anesthesia

Intervention Type DRUG

Injectable anesthesia 2% lidocaine with epinephrine 1:100.000

sextant 3

Treatment with subgingival scaling and root planing was done in 6 weekly sessions, being the sextant 1 in the randomization for experimental procedures (2% Benzocaine)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

2% Benzocaine

Intervention Type DRUG

Topical anesthetic - 200mg/g of 2% benzocaine

sextant 4

Treatment with subgingival scaling and root planing was done in 6 weekly sessions, being the sextant 1 in the randomization for experimental procedures (Placebo)

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Manipulated with the same appearance and viscosity of topical anesthetics mentioned above

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

EMLA

% eutectic mixture of 25mg/g lidocaine and 25 mg/g of prilocaine

Intervention Type DRUG

Injectable anesthesia

Injectable anesthesia 2% lidocaine with epinephrine 1:100.000

Intervention Type DRUG

2% Benzocaine

Topical anesthetic - 200mg/g of 2% benzocaine

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Manipulated with the same appearance and viscosity of topical anesthetics mentioned above

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

EMLA®, AstraZeneca, Cotia, SP, Brazil Alphacaine®, DFL, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil Benzotop ®, DFL, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil manipulated topical anesthetics

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* eligible individuals for the study were selected from those requiring SRP with at least 2 experimental teeth in four of the six sextants.
* each experimental teeth had to present ≥ 1 site with probing depth ≥ 5 mm associated with BP after treatment of gingivitis (without marginal bleeding).
* furthermore, individual should present ≥ 18 years-old, have not ever done periodontal treatment and be able to understand Verbal Scale (VS) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS).

Exclusion Criteria

* patients that related allergy history or sensitivity reaction to any used amide or ester anesthetics form,
* who received anesthesia or sedation 12 hours before SRP,
* who presented ulcerated lesions or abscesses in the oral cavity,
* who presented oral pathologies with immediate surgical,
* who had prior abuse alcohol history, pregnant women,
* who presented uncontrolled hypertension or
* who had participated in a clinical trial of investigational drug before four months from the beginning of this study.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Franciscan University Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Raquel Pippi Antoniazzi

Topical intrapocket anesthesia with prilocaine and lidocaine as an alternative to injectable anesthesia during scaling and root planing - A randomized clinical trial

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

EMLA2012

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

EMLA Cream in Hysteroscopy Practice
NCT02640183 UNKNOWN PHASE2
Emla Cream Versus Benzocaine on Analgesia
NCT05060913 COMPLETED EARLY_PHASE1