EMLA Topical Anesthetic During Scaling and Root Planing
NCT ID: NCT01860235
Last Updated: 2013-05-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
32 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-06-30
2012-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Two Topical Anesthetics: Benzocaine Versus Pliaglis
NCT01951820
Effect of Sodium Bicarbonate Buffered Lidocaine on the Success of IAN Block of Teeth With Irreversible Pulpitis
NCT02226913
Buffered vs. Unbuffered Local Anesthesia in Mandibular Molars Diagnosed With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis
NCT05227300
Combination of Buffered Anesthetic to Treat Mandibular Molars
NCT06047366
Clinical Efficiency of Xanthan Hydrogels Containing Local Anesthetics Encapsulated in Nanostructured Lipid Carries
NCT05912335
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Methods: Thirty-two patients were enrolled in this split-mouth, double-blind randomized clinical trial. Patients were randomized to a sequence of four anesthetics: 25 mg/g lidocaine and 25 mg/g of 5% prilocaine (EMLA®), injectable 2% lidocaine, topical 2% benzocaine, or placebo. Pain and discomfort were measured using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Verbal Scale (VS). Patient satisfaction with anesthesia was also determined at the end of each treatment session.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
sextant 1
Treatment with subgingival scaling and root planing was done in 6 weekly sessions, being the sextant 1 in the randomization for experimental procedures (EMLA)
EMLA
% eutectic mixture of 25mg/g lidocaine and 25 mg/g of prilocaine
sextant 2
Treatment with subgingival scaling and root planing was done in 6 weekly sessions, being the sextant 1 in the randomization for experimental procedures (Injectable anesthesia)
Injectable anesthesia
Injectable anesthesia 2% lidocaine with epinephrine 1:100.000
sextant 3
Treatment with subgingival scaling and root planing was done in 6 weekly sessions, being the sextant 1 in the randomization for experimental procedures (2% Benzocaine)
2% Benzocaine
Topical anesthetic - 200mg/g of 2% benzocaine
sextant 4
Treatment with subgingival scaling and root planing was done in 6 weekly sessions, being the sextant 1 in the randomization for experimental procedures (Placebo)
Placebo
Manipulated with the same appearance and viscosity of topical anesthetics mentioned above
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
EMLA
% eutectic mixture of 25mg/g lidocaine and 25 mg/g of prilocaine
Injectable anesthesia
Injectable anesthesia 2% lidocaine with epinephrine 1:100.000
2% Benzocaine
Topical anesthetic - 200mg/g of 2% benzocaine
Placebo
Manipulated with the same appearance and viscosity of topical anesthetics mentioned above
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* each experimental teeth had to present ≥ 1 site with probing depth ≥ 5 mm associated with BP after treatment of gingivitis (without marginal bleeding).
* furthermore, individual should present ≥ 18 years-old, have not ever done periodontal treatment and be able to understand Verbal Scale (VS) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
Exclusion Criteria
* who received anesthesia or sedation 12 hours before SRP,
* who presented ulcerated lesions or abscesses in the oral cavity,
* who presented oral pathologies with immediate surgical,
* who had prior abuse alcohol history, pregnant women,
* who presented uncontrolled hypertension or
* who had participated in a clinical trial of investigational drug before four months from the beginning of this study.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Franciscan University Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Raquel Pippi Antoniazzi
Topical intrapocket anesthesia with prilocaine and lidocaine as an alternative to injectable anesthesia during scaling and root planing - A randomized clinical trial
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
EMLA2012
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.