Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE4
3 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-06-30
2016-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Fractional Laser Assisted Delivery of Anesthetics
NCT02246179
Fractional Laser Assisted Delivery of Anesthetics IIIb
NCT03279757
Comparative Study of Two Topical Anesthetics Prior to Fractional Nonablative Laser Treatment of the Face
NCT04523961
Ice Versus EMLA for Pain in Laser Hair Removal
NCT02318654
Comparison Study on Topical Anesthetic Agents (LMX4 and BLT) Prior to Fractional Skin Resurfacing
NCT01842373
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Objective: The objective of this study is to assess the efficacy of skin anesthesia using fractional laser assisted delivery of articaine hydrochloride 40 mg/ml and epinephrine 10 µg/ml solution (AHES) compared to standard anesthesia with topical eutectic mixture of lidocaine 25 mg/g and prilocaine 25 mg/g cream (EMLA cream).
Study design: Prospective, open label, randomized controlled, within subject, study.
Study population: patients \>18 years, who give written informed consent, visiting the institute for fractional carbon dioxide laser treatment for acne scars or traumatic scars.
Intervention (if applicable): In each patient, the lesional area will be divided into two comparable regions during the visit prior to the (next) fractional laser treatment. These regions will then be randomly allocated to either standard anesthesia with EMLA cream (control region; region I) or ablative fractional laser (AFXL) assisted delivery of AHES (intervention region; region II). Patients will be asked to apply EMLA cream at region I under occlusion two hours prior to the laser treatment. Fifteen minutes before the therapeutic laser treatment of the scars, the skin of region II will be pretreated with the fractional carbon dioxide laser (15% density, 2.5 mJ/microbeam). Directly following fractional laser pretreatment, AHES will be topically applied under occlusion at region II for 15 minutes. Subsequently treatment of both regions will be performed with the same fractional carbon dioxide laser at the settings used in routine clinical practice. Directly after this therapeutic laser treatment, patients will be asked to indicate pain per test region on a visual analogue scale (VAS) from 0-10 (0: no pain; 10: worst imaginable pain).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Region 1
Standard topical anesthesia using eutectic mixture of lidocaine 25 mg/g and prilocaine 25 mg/g cream (EMLA cream) applied two hours before treatment.
EMLA cream
Topical application 2 hours prior to the treatment.
Region 2
Anesthesia using articaine hydrochloride 40 mg/ml and epinephrine 10 µg/ml solution (AHES) applied on ablative fractional laser (AFXL) pretreated skin 15 minutes prior to the treatment.
AFXL
Pretreatment at 2.5 mJ/microbeam and 15% density.
AHES
Topical application on AFXL pretreated skin 15 minutes prior to the treatment.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
AFXL
Pretreatment at 2.5 mJ/microbeam and 15% density.
AHES
Topical application on AFXL pretreated skin 15 minutes prior to the treatment.
EMLA cream
Topical application 2 hours prior to the treatment.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age ≥18 years
* Patient is willing and able to give written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Pregnancy or lactation
* Incompetency to understand what the procedure involves
* Current complaints of chronic pain or other alterations in pain sensation (e.g. due to diabetes mellitus or lepra)
* Current treatment with systemic analgesics or other medication that can influence pain sensation
* Total lesional area to be treated in one session \>600 cm2
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Netherlands Institute for Pigment Disorders
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Albert Wolkerstorfer, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Netherlands Institute for Pigment Disorders, Department of Dermatology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam
Menno A. De Rie, MD, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Department of Dermatology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Netherlands Institute for Pigment disorders
Amsterdam, , Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Haedersdal M, Sakamoto FH, Farinelli WA, Doukas AG, Tam J, Anderson RR. Fractional CO(2) laser-assisted drug delivery. Lasers Surg Med. 2010 Feb;42(2):113-22. doi: 10.1002/lsm.20860.
Haak CS, Farinelli WA, Tam J, Doukas AG, Anderson RR, Haedersdal M. Fractional laser-assisted delivery of methyl aminolevulinate: Impact of laser channel depth and incubation time. Lasers Surg Med. 2012 Dec;44(10):787-95. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22102. Epub 2012 Dec 4.
Oni G, Rasko Y, Kenkel J. Topical lidocaine enhanced by laser pretreatment: a safe and effective method of analgesia for facial rejuvenation. Aesthet Surg J. 2013 Aug 1;33(6):854-61. doi: 10.1177/1090820X13496248.
Ong MW, Bashir SJ. Fractional laser resurfacing for acne scars: a review. Br J Dermatol. 2012 Jun;166(6):1160-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2012.10870.x. Epub 2012 May 8.
Wolfe JW, Butterworth JF. Local anesthetic systemic toxicity: update on mechanisms and treatment. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2011 Oct;24(5):561-6. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e32834a9394.
Koh JL, Harrison D, Swanson V, Norvell DC, Coomber DC. A comparison of laser-assisted drug delivery at two output energies for enhancing the delivery of topically applied LMX-4 cream prior to venipuncture. Anesth Analg. 2007 Apr;104(4):847-9. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000257925.36641.9e.
Baron ED, Harris L, Redpath WS, Shapiro H, Hetzel F, Morley G, Bar-Or D, Stevens SR. Laser-assisted penetration of topical anesthetic in adults. Arch Dermatol. 2003 Oct;139(10):1288-90. doi: 10.1001/archderm.139.10.1288.
Shapiro H, Harris L, Hetzel FW, Bar-Or D. Laser assisted delivery of topical anesthesia for intramuscular needle insertion in adults. Lasers Surg Med. 2002;31(4):252-6. doi: 10.1002/lsm.10101.
Togsverd-Bo K, Haak CS, Thaysen-Petersen D, Wulf HC, Anderson RR, Haedersdal M. Intensified photodynamic therapy of actinic keratoses with fractional CO2 laser: a randomized clinical trial. Br J Dermatol. 2012 Jun;166(6):1262-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2012.10893.x.
Hantash BM, Bedi VP, Chan KF, Zachary CB. Ex vivo histological characterization of a novel ablative fractional resurfacing device. Lasers Surg Med. 2007 Feb;39(2):87-95. doi: 10.1002/lsm.20405.
Haak CS, Bhayana B, Farinelli WA, Anderson RR, Haedersdal M. The impact of treatment density and molecular weight for fractional laser-assisted drug delivery. J Control Release. 2012 Nov 10;163(3):335-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2012.09.008. Epub 2012 Sep 21.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NL49394.018.14
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.