Jet Injection of 1% Buffered Lidocaine Versus Topical EMLA for Local Anesthesia Before Lumbar Puncture in Children

NCT ID: NCT01628874

Last Updated: 2019-06-21

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

66 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-09-30

Study Completion Date

2016-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a needle-free jet-injection system with 1% buffered lidocaine for local anesthesia for lumbar punctures compared to a topical anesthetic agent. Our hypothesis is: A needle-free jet-injection system (J-Tip) with 1% lidocaine will provide local anesthesia that is comparable to that of a topical anesthetic agent (EMLA cream) when performing lumbar punctures in children.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Lumbar punctures are a common procedure performed in children in the emergency department. In febrile infants they are frequently performed as part of a sepsis evaluation, and in older children they are used in the evaluation of possible meningitis, new seizures, altered mental status and other neurologic emergencies.

Several studies in the pediatric emergency medicine literature have found a positive association between lumbar puncture success and the use of local anesthesia in infant lumbar punctures. Despite this data, studies have shown that 70-76% of lumbar punctures in the emergency department are performed without any form of pain management, with up to 95% of infants receiving no form of pain management. Common reasoning for providers to forgo pain management include the time for topical anesthetics to be effective (30-45 minutes), the pain already associated with injectable lidocaine, and obscuring of anatomic landmarks with injectable lidocaine.

A recent development in pain management for pediatric procedures is the use of needle-free jet injection of lidocaine. One such device is the J-Tip, which uses a compressed carbon dioxide (CO2) cartridge to deliver medication to the subcutaneous tissues to a depth of 5-8 mm in 0.2 seconds. It has been shown to be largely pain-free for children. Multiple studies have shown it to be effective in reducing pain associated with peripheral IV placement in children. The J-Tip has recently been approved for peripheral IV starts in the Children's Hospital Colorado emergency department.

Some hospitals anecdotally report using the device for lumbar punctures, but to date no randomized studies have evaluated its effectiveness in pain management compared to other methods. Our study aims to evaluate the efficacy of the J-Tip in lumbar punctures. It offers the advantage of providing much faster anesthesia compared to topical creams, yet does not require the initial skin puncture of injectable lidocaine. If a rapid form of local anesthesia is available, it may increase the overall use of local anesthesia and improve pain management in the pediatric population.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lumbar Puncture Topical Analgesia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Lidocaine Injection

0.5 mL (5mg) of 1% lidocaine injection given with the J-Tip

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

J-Tip

Intervention Type DEVICE

Used once for both arms prior to lumbar puncture. The Experimental arm will receive 0.5 mL (5mg) of 1% Lidocaine. The Active Comparator arm will receive normal saline. This will occur after the cream has been placed for 30 minutes and wiped away and prior to the lumbar puncture.

EMLA

Intervention Type DRUG

In the Active Comparator arm, lidocaine 2.5% and prilocaine 2.5% cream placed over area where lumbar puncture will occur for at least 30 minutes. This same procedure will occur for the Experimental arm with a placebo cream instead. This will occur once prior to the J-Tip injection and lumbar puncture.

Lidocaine

Intervention Type DRUG

5 mg given via J-Tip once, repeat dosing as needed in the Experimental group. A placebo will be given in the Active Comparator group.

lidocaine 2.5% and prilocaine 2.5% (EMLA) Cream

Patients in this arm will receive 1g EMLA cream if they are in the younger age group and 10g EMLA cream if they are in the older age group. This will be placed for a minimum of 30 minutes.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

J-Tip

Intervention Type DEVICE

Used once for both arms prior to lumbar puncture. The Experimental arm will receive 0.5 mL (5mg) of 1% Lidocaine. The Active Comparator arm will receive normal saline. This will occur after the cream has been placed for 30 minutes and wiped away and prior to the lumbar puncture.

EMLA

Intervention Type DRUG

In the Active Comparator arm, lidocaine 2.5% and prilocaine 2.5% cream placed over area where lumbar puncture will occur for at least 30 minutes. This same procedure will occur for the Experimental arm with a placebo cream instead. This will occur once prior to the J-Tip injection and lumbar puncture.

Lidocaine

Intervention Type DRUG

5 mg given via J-Tip once, repeat dosing as needed in the Experimental group. A placebo will be given in the Active Comparator group.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

J-Tip

Used once for both arms prior to lumbar puncture. The Experimental arm will receive 0.5 mL (5mg) of 1% Lidocaine. The Active Comparator arm will receive normal saline. This will occur after the cream has been placed for 30 minutes and wiped away and prior to the lumbar puncture.

Intervention Type DEVICE

EMLA

In the Active Comparator arm, lidocaine 2.5% and prilocaine 2.5% cream placed over area where lumbar puncture will occur for at least 30 minutes. This same procedure will occur for the Experimental arm with a placebo cream instead. This will occur once prior to the J-Tip injection and lumbar puncture.

Intervention Type DRUG

Lidocaine

5 mg given via J-Tip once, repeat dosing as needed in the Experimental group. A placebo will be given in the Active Comparator group.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Needle-free jet-injection system EMLA Cream

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* age ≤4 months or 4-18 years
* ability to report VAS for patients 4-18 years
* require lumbar puncture as part of their clinical care

Exclusion Criteria

* ages 5-47 months
* developmental delay or inability to complete VAS in older patients
* allergy to lidocaine
* requirement of sedation for procedure
* pre-procedural analgesia treatment except for nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and acetaminophen.
Maximum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Colorado Clinical & Translational Sciences Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Colorado, Denver

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ryan Caltagirone, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Children's Hospital Colorado and University of Colorado Denver

Kathleen Adelgais, MD, MPH

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Children's Hospital Colorado and University of Colorado Denver

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Children's Hospital Colorado

Aurora, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Fein D, Avner JR, Khine H. Pattern of pain management during lumbar puncture in children. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2010 May;26(5):357-60. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3181db2026.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20404782 (View on PubMed)

Baxter AL, Welch JC, Burke BL, Isaacman DJ. Pain, position, and stylet styles: infant lumbar puncture practices of pediatric emergency attending physicians. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2004 Dec;20(12):816-20. doi: 10.1097/01.pec.0000148030.99339.fe.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15572969 (View on PubMed)

Spanos S, Booth R, Koenig H, Sikes K, Gracely E, Kim IK. Jet Injection of 1% buffered lidocaine versus topical ELA-Max for anesthesia before peripheral intravenous catheterization in children: a randomized controlled trial. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2008 Aug;24(8):511-5. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31816a8d5b.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18645542 (View on PubMed)

Quinn M, Carraccio C, Sacchetti A. Pain, punctures, and pediatricians. Pediatr Emerg Care. 1993 Feb;9(1):12-4. doi: 10.1097/00006565-199302000-00005. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8488137 (View on PubMed)

Tomlinson D, von Baeyer CL, Stinson JN, Sung L. A systematic review of faces scales for the self-report of pain intensity in children. Pediatrics. 2010 Nov;126(5):e1168-98. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-1609. Epub 2010 Oct 4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20921070 (View on PubMed)

Baxter AL, Fisher RG, Burke BL, Goldblatt SS, Isaacman DJ, Lawson ML. Local anesthetic and stylet styles: factors associated with resident lumbar puncture success. Pediatrics. 2006 Mar;117(3):876-81. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-0519.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16510670 (View on PubMed)

Powell CV, Kelly AM, Williams A. Determining the minimum clinically significant difference in visual analog pain score for children. Ann Emerg Med. 2001 Jan;37(1):28-31. doi: 10.1067/mem.2001.111517.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11145767 (View on PubMed)

Nigrovic LE, Kuppermann N, Neuman MI. Risk factors for traumatic or unsuccessful lumbar punctures in children. Ann Emerg Med. 2007 Jun;49(6):762-71. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.10.018. Epub 2007 Feb 23.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17321005 (View on PubMed)

Jimenez N, Bradford H, Seidel KD, Sousa M, Lynn AM. A comparison of a needle-free injection system for local anesthesia versus EMLA for intravenous catheter insertion in the pediatric patient. Anesth Analg. 2006 Feb;102(2):411-4. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000194293.10549.62.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16428534 (View on PubMed)

Kaur G, Gupta P, Kumar A. A randomized trial of eutectic mixture of local anesthetics during lumbar puncture in newborns. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003 Nov;157(11):1065-70. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.157.11.1065.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14609894 (View on PubMed)

Rushforth JA, Levene MI. Behavioural response to pain in healthy neonates. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1994 May;70(3):F174-6. doi: 10.1136/fn.70.3.f174.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8198409 (View on PubMed)

Grunau RVE, Craig KD. Pain expression in neonates: facial action and cry. Pain. 1987 Mar;28(3):395-410. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(87)90073-X.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 3574966 (View on PubMed)

Caltagirone R, Raghavan VR, Adelgais K, Roosevelt GE. A Randomized Double Blind Trial of Needle-free Injected Lidocaine Versus Topical Anesthesia for Infant Lumbar Puncture. Acad Emerg Med. 2018 Mar;25(3):310-316. doi: 10.1111/acem.13351. Epub 2017 Dec 26.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29160002 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

12-0542

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Efficacy of a New Topical Anesthetic
NCT00562211 COMPLETED PHASE1/PHASE2