J-Tip® Jet Injection of 1% Buffered Lidocaine or Saline Versus 4% Lidocaine Cream Before Venipuncture or IV Insertion
NCT ID: NCT00924963
Last Updated: 2020-09-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
EARLY_PHASE1
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-06-30
2010-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Use of Jet Injection Lidocaine for Blood Draws in Young Children
NCT01890642
Needle-Free Jet Injection of Lidocaine During Lumbar Puncture
NCT01224431
Jet Lidocaine for Pain Relief During Needle Insertion in a Pediatric Emergency Department
NCT00681902
Jet Injection of 1% Buffered Lidocaine Versus Topical ELA-Max for Anesthesia Prior to Intravenous (IV) Catheterization in Children
NCT00444756
Needleless Jet Injected (J-Tip) Lidocaine in Children Undergoing Regional Anesthesia Prior to Knee Arthroscopy
NCT02649322
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Specific Aims: To measure and compare pain associated with venipuncture and peripheral intravenous catheter insertion among pediatric emergency department patients randomized to treatment with one of three different pain-reduction strategies: J-Tip® jet injection of 1% buffered lidocaine, J-Tip® jet injection of sterile saline, or application of 4% lidocaine topical cream.
Methods: This study is a partially blinded, placebo controlled, randomized controlled clinical trial in the pediatric emergency department. The comparison of J-Tip® jet injection of 1% buffered lidocaine to J-Tip® jet injection of sterile saline is double blinded, while the comparison of jet injection to 4% lidocaine topical cream is not blinded. Forty-four patients per group will be enrolled, and a VAS self-reported measurement will be recorded for the pain of venipuncture or PIVC insertion following the appropriate treatment. As well, success of the procedure and complications of treatment will be recorded.
Results: Pain scores will be analyzed by pairwise comparisons using a t-test and pooled comparisons using ANOVA. Demographics will be assessed to determine baseline differences among the three groups. Chi square and regression analysis will be performed on demographic differences to determine significance if necessary. Final pain results will be reported as mean, standard deviation, and p-value. Demographics will be reported as number, percent of patients, and p-value (if a difference exists).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Jet injection lidocaine
J-Tip jet injection of 1% buffered lidocaine
J-Tip jet injector
0.2ml 1%buffered lidocaine delivered by jet injector
Jet injection saline
J-Tip jet injection of sterile saline
Jet injection saline
0.2ml saline delivered via J-Tip jet injection
Lidocaine cream
Lidocaine 4%cream applied for 30 minutes prior to IV insertion or venipuncture
lidocaine cream
4% lidocaine cream applied for 30 minutes to the skin
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
J-Tip jet injector
0.2ml 1%buffered lidocaine delivered by jet injector
Jet injection saline
0.2ml saline delivered via J-Tip jet injection
lidocaine cream
4% lidocaine cream applied for 30 minutes to the skin
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* TegadermTM allergy,
* Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) less than 15,
* Pain at the proposed site for the procedure,
* Requirement of a PIVC or venipuncture immediately due to illness acuity,
* Inability to complete a self-reported pain scale (VAS, visual analogue scale),
* Patients who do not speak and understand English, OR
* Previous enrollment in the study.
7 Years
21 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Stephanie L Spanos, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati
Srikant Iyer, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Liberty Township Emergency Department
Liberty Township, Ohio, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2008-0922
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.