J-Tip® Jet Injection of 1% Buffered Lidocaine or Saline Versus 4% Lidocaine Cream Before Venipuncture or IV Insertion

NCT ID: NCT00924963

Last Updated: 2020-09-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Clinical Phase

EARLY_PHASE1

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-06-30

Study Completion Date

2010-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To measure and compare pain associated with venipuncture and peripheral intravenous catheter insertion among pediatric emergency department patients randomized to treatment with one of three different pain-reduction strategies: J-Tip® jet injection of 1% buffered lidocaine, J-Tip® jet injection of sterile saline, or application of 4% lidocaine topical cream. The investigators hypothesize that J-Tip® jet injection of 1% buffered lidocaine will provide superior local anesthesia compared to saline or lidocaine cream.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background: Venipuncture and PIVC insertion are the most common procedures performed in the pediatric emergency department. They are painful procedures, and frequently no local anesthesia is provided. The American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Pediatric Emergency Medicine and Section on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine has recommended that local anesthesia be provided, but a variety of barriers exist which have prevented implementation of this recommendation.

Specific Aims: To measure and compare pain associated with venipuncture and peripheral intravenous catheter insertion among pediatric emergency department patients randomized to treatment with one of three different pain-reduction strategies: J-Tip® jet injection of 1% buffered lidocaine, J-Tip® jet injection of sterile saline, or application of 4% lidocaine topical cream.

Methods: This study is a partially blinded, placebo controlled, randomized controlled clinical trial in the pediatric emergency department. The comparison of J-Tip® jet injection of 1% buffered lidocaine to J-Tip® jet injection of sterile saline is double blinded, while the comparison of jet injection to 4% lidocaine topical cream is not blinded. Forty-four patients per group will be enrolled, and a VAS self-reported measurement will be recorded for the pain of venipuncture or PIVC insertion following the appropriate treatment. As well, success of the procedure and complications of treatment will be recorded.

Results: Pain scores will be analyzed by pairwise comparisons using a t-test and pooled comparisons using ANOVA. Demographics will be assessed to determine baseline differences among the three groups. Chi square and regression analysis will be performed on demographic differences to determine significance if necessary. Final pain results will be reported as mean, standard deviation, and p-value. Demographics will be reported as number, percent of patients, and p-value (if a difference exists).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Jet injection lidocaine

J-Tip jet injection of 1% buffered lidocaine

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

J-Tip jet injector

Intervention Type DEVICE

0.2ml 1%buffered lidocaine delivered by jet injector

Jet injection saline

J-Tip jet injection of sterile saline

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Jet injection saline

Intervention Type DEVICE

0.2ml saline delivered via J-Tip jet injection

Lidocaine cream

Lidocaine 4%cream applied for 30 minutes prior to IV insertion or venipuncture

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

lidocaine cream

Intervention Type DRUG

4% lidocaine cream applied for 30 minutes to the skin

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

J-Tip jet injector

0.2ml 1%buffered lidocaine delivered by jet injector

Intervention Type DEVICE

Jet injection saline

0.2ml saline delivered via J-Tip jet injection

Intervention Type DEVICE

lidocaine cream

4% lidocaine cream applied for 30 minutes to the skin

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

J-Tip jet injector with 1% buffered lidocaine J-Tip Jet injection with saline 4% lidocaine cream

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Children aged seven to twenty-one years old requiring venipuncture or PIVC insertion as part of their emergency department care are eligible for the study.

Exclusion Criteria

* Lidocaine allergy,
* TegadermTM allergy,
* Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) less than 15,
* Pain at the proposed site for the procedure,
* Requirement of a PIVC or venipuncture immediately due to illness acuity,
* Inability to complete a self-reported pain scale (VAS, visual analogue scale),
* Patients who do not speak and understand English, OR
* Previous enrollment in the study.
Minimum Eligible Age

7 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

21 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Stephanie L Spanos, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati

Srikant Iyer, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Cincinnati Children's Hospital Liberty Township Emergency Department

Liberty Township, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2008-0922

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Efficacy of a New Topical Anesthetic
NCT00562211 COMPLETED PHASE1/PHASE2