Local Anesthetic Cream in Younger Patients Undergoing Lumbar Punctures
NCT ID: NCT01516684
Last Updated: 2019-09-06
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
33 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-05-14
2018-06-26
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Pain Control in Pediatric Oncology: Utility of EMLA Cream vs Lidocaine Injection in Lumbar Punctures
NCT04003012
Evaluation of the Analgesy With Emla and/or Nitrous Oxide in Pediatric Patients for Lumbar Puncture
NCT00808171
Jet Injection of 1% Buffered Lidocaine Versus Topical EMLA for Local Anesthesia Before Lumbar Puncture in Children
NCT01628874
Anesthesia Lumbar Puncture In Children
NCT02590705
Pain Perception During Vulvar Biopsy
NCT03654417
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
I. To determine whether the application of a topical anesthetic (EMLA cream) to the LP site will decrease the total dose of propofol administered to pediatric oncology patients who are being sedated for LPs compared to application of a topical placebo cream.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To determine whether the use of EMLA cream decreases complication rates from sedation.
II. To determine whether the use of EMLA cream decreases traumatic lumbar punctures.
III. To determine whether the use of EMLA cream shortens recovery time. IV. To determine practitioner and parent satisfaction with the use of EMLA cream.
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
ARM I: Patients receive topical EMLA cream 60 minutes to 4 hours prior to the LP followed by standard sedation with fentanyl citrate and propofol.
ARM II: Patients receive topical placebo cream 60 minutes to 4 hours prior to the LP followed by standard sedation with fentanyl citrate and propofol.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up within 1 week.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Arm I (EMLA)
Patients receive topical EMLA cream 60 minutes to 4 hours prior to the LP followed by standard sedation with fentanyl citrate and propofol.
EMLA
Given topically
propofol
Given IV
fentanyl citrate
Given IV
Arm II (placebo)
Patients receive topical placebo cream 60 minutes to 4 hours prior to the LP followed by standard sedation with fentanyl citrate and propofol.
placebo administration
Given topically
propofol
Given IV
fentanyl citrate
Given IV
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
placebo administration
Given topically
EMLA
Given topically
propofol
Given IV
fentanyl citrate
Given IV
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
22 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
NIH
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Dudley Hammon
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NCI-2012-00019
Identifier Type: REGISTRY
Identifier Source: secondary_id
CCCWFU 01211
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
IRB00017079
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.