Clinical Trial Comparing Effectiveness of Buffered Versus Unbuffered Local Anesthetic in Children Ages 10-12 Years
NCT ID: NCT03562481
Last Updated: 2020-06-25
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
26 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-07-24
2019-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The specific aims of this investigation are to determine differences between buffered 1% and unbuffered 2% lidocaine (both with 1:100,000 epinephrine) used for inferior alveolar nerve block (IAN) anesthesia, in the following domains:
1. Pain experience on injection, time to onset following the administration, and time to recovery \[subjective\]
2. Blood lidocaine levels 15 minutes following the administration and duration of pulpal anesthesia \[objective\]
Null Hypotheses:
1. No difference exists in anesthetic effectiveness for pulpal anesthesia after intraoral IAN block between buffered 1% Lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine as compared to unbuffered 2% Lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine.
2. No differences exist in peak blood lidocaine levels, pain on injection, time to lip numbness, and duration of anesthesia between the two drug formulations.
Randomized subjects will be injected orally for bottom jaw anesthesia, with 3cc of buffered 1% lidocaine (30mg) 1:100,000 epinephrine or 3cc unbuffered of 2% lidocaine (60mg) 1:100,000 epinephrine. The injectable volume of the buffered formulation will include 0.3cc of 8.4% sodium bicarbonate.
One faculty member in the Department of Pediatric Dentistry at the University of North Carolina (UNC) School of Dentistry will administer the drugs in the Pediatric Dentistry clinic. The same clinician will administer injection to the same subjects at both visits. Clinicians and subjects will not know which drug formulation is given at which appointment.
A clinician will measure the level of discomfort on injection, how long it takes for the lip to be numb, how long it takes for the first molar tooth in that area to be numb, how long it takes the local anesthetic to wear off, and how much of the anesthetic is in the blood.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Clinical Outcomes of Buffered 1% Lidocaine vs. Non-buffered 2% Lidocaine
NCT02708433
Clinical Outcomes Mandible: Buffered 1% vs. Non-Buffered 1% Lidocaine
NCT03127943
Clinical Outcomes of Buffered vs. Non-Buffered Lidocaine
NCT02620683
Buffered Lidocaine in the Pediatric Dental Patient
NCT04055116
Clinical Outcomes Maxilla: Buffered 1% Lidocaine vs. Non-buffered 2% Lidocaine
NCT02747186
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
The randomization will be performed to the type of drug given first, using a balanced randomization (half subjects buffered, half unbuffered) implemented with SAS software routines. During the first session, each subject will receive an IAN block with the first randomly assigned anesthetic formulation using the Halstead technique. At least a week later, substantially longer than the elimination half-life of the drug lidocaine (1.5-2hr), local anesthetic injections will be done using the alternate local anesthetic formulation.
OTHER
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Buffered Anesthetic, then Unbuffered Anesthetic
Subjects randomized to Buffered Anesthetic, then Unbuffered Anesthetic will first receive an injection with 1% Buffered Lidocaine 1:100,000 Epinephrine. After one week minimum washout period, subjects will then receive an injection with 2% Unbuffered Lidocaine 1:100,000 Epinephrine.
1% Buffered Lidocaine 1:100,000 Epinephrine
A single IAN block with 3cc 1% Buffered Lidocaine (30mg) 1:100,000 Epinephrine using the Halstead technique.
2% Unbuffered Lidocaine 1:100,000 Epinephrine
A single IAN block with 3cc 2% Unbuffered Lidocaine (60mg) 1:100,000 Epinephrine using the Halstead technique.
Unbuffered Anesthetic, then Buffered Anesthetic
Subjects randomized to Unbuffered Anesthetic, then Buffered Anesthetic will first receive an injection with 2% Unbuffered Lidocaine 1:100,000 Epinephrine. After one week minimum washout period, subjects will then receive an injection with 1% Buffered Lidocaine 1:100,000 Epinephrine.
1% Buffered Lidocaine 1:100,000 Epinephrine
A single IAN block with 3cc 1% Buffered Lidocaine (30mg) 1:100,000 Epinephrine using the Halstead technique.
2% Unbuffered Lidocaine 1:100,000 Epinephrine
A single IAN block with 3cc 2% Unbuffered Lidocaine (60mg) 1:100,000 Epinephrine using the Halstead technique.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
1% Buffered Lidocaine 1:100,000 Epinephrine
A single IAN block with 3cc 1% Buffered Lidocaine (30mg) 1:100,000 Epinephrine using the Halstead technique.
2% Unbuffered Lidocaine 1:100,000 Epinephrine
A single IAN block with 3cc 2% Unbuffered Lidocaine (60mg) 1:100,000 Epinephrine using the Halstead technique.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Class I (Healthy)
* Body Weight: the Interquartile Range (IQR) 33-60Kg for subject ages
* Have ability to speak and read English
* Willingness to participate in two sessions
* No history of adverse reaction to dental anesthetic
* Have bilateral, disease/symptom-free mandibular first molars present
Exclusion Criteria
* Local anesthetic drug use in past week
* Current symptomatic teeth or oral mucosa
* ASA II or above (including asthma)
10 Years
12 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jessica Y Lee, DDS,MPH,PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
UNC-Chapel Hill School of Dentistry, Pediatric Dentistry
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
UNC School of Dentistry
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
16-3106
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.