Clinical Trial Comparing Effectiveness of Buffered Versus Unbuffered Local Anesthetic in Children Ages 10-12 Years

NCT ID: NCT03562481

Last Updated: 2020-06-25

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

26 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-07-24

Study Completion Date

2019-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Local anesthesia is an integral part of clinical pediatric dental practice, but it has challenges. It can be uncomfortable for children, and the risk of adverse events limits how much is used. Some evidence suggests benefits of buffering local anesthetics including equal effect with less pain on injection. These findings have not been replicated and validated among pediatric populations, creating a gap in the knowledge base. To address this knowledge gap and contribute to the evidence base on safety and efficacy of local anesthesia in pediatric dentistry, this investigation proposes to compare the anesthetic effects of buffered 1% lidocaine with those of unbuffered 2%, among children.

The specific aims of this investigation are to determine differences between buffered 1% and unbuffered 2% lidocaine (both with 1:100,000 epinephrine) used for inferior alveolar nerve block (IAN) anesthesia, in the following domains:

1. Pain experience on injection, time to onset following the administration, and time to recovery \[subjective\]
2. Blood lidocaine levels 15 minutes following the administration and duration of pulpal anesthesia \[objective\]

Null Hypotheses:

1. No difference exists in anesthetic effectiveness for pulpal anesthesia after intraoral IAN block between buffered 1% Lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine as compared to unbuffered 2% Lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine.
2. No differences exist in peak blood lidocaine levels, pain on injection, time to lip numbness, and duration of anesthesia between the two drug formulations.

Randomized subjects will be injected orally for bottom jaw anesthesia, with 3cc of buffered 1% lidocaine (30mg) 1:100,000 epinephrine or 3cc unbuffered of 2% lidocaine (60mg) 1:100,000 epinephrine. The injectable volume of the buffered formulation will include 0.3cc of 8.4% sodium bicarbonate.

One faculty member in the Department of Pediatric Dentistry at the University of North Carolina (UNC) School of Dentistry will administer the drugs in the Pediatric Dentistry clinic. The same clinician will administer injection to the same subjects at both visits. Clinicians and subjects will not know which drug formulation is given at which appointment.

A clinician will measure the level of discomfort on injection, how long it takes for the lip to be numb, how long it takes for the first molar tooth in that area to be numb, how long it takes the local anesthetic to wear off, and how much of the anesthetic is in the blood.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Anesthesia, Local Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Study subjects will serve as their own controls in this crossover AB/BA study design which is uniform within sequences (groups, i.e. AB/BA, of order of drug formulation administration), uniform within periods (equal time between administration of alternating drug formulations), and balanced (equal number of subjects within each study arm).

The randomization will be performed to the type of drug given first, using a balanced randomization (half subjects buffered, half unbuffered) implemented with SAS software routines. During the first session, each subject will receive an IAN block with the first randomly assigned anesthetic formulation using the Halstead technique. At least a week later, substantially longer than the elimination half-life of the drug lidocaine (1.5-2hr), local anesthetic injections will be done using the alternate local anesthetic formulation.
Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Buffered Anesthetic, then Unbuffered Anesthetic

Subjects randomized to Buffered Anesthetic, then Unbuffered Anesthetic will first receive an injection with 1% Buffered Lidocaine 1:100,000 Epinephrine. After one week minimum washout period, subjects will then receive an injection with 2% Unbuffered Lidocaine 1:100,000 Epinephrine.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

1% Buffered Lidocaine 1:100,000 Epinephrine

Intervention Type DRUG

A single IAN block with 3cc 1% Buffered Lidocaine (30mg) 1:100,000 Epinephrine using the Halstead technique.

2% Unbuffered Lidocaine 1:100,000 Epinephrine

Intervention Type DRUG

A single IAN block with 3cc 2% Unbuffered Lidocaine (60mg) 1:100,000 Epinephrine using the Halstead technique.

Unbuffered Anesthetic, then Buffered Anesthetic

Subjects randomized to Unbuffered Anesthetic, then Buffered Anesthetic will first receive an injection with 2% Unbuffered Lidocaine 1:100,000 Epinephrine. After one week minimum washout period, subjects will then receive an injection with 1% Buffered Lidocaine 1:100,000 Epinephrine.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

1% Buffered Lidocaine 1:100,000 Epinephrine

Intervention Type DRUG

A single IAN block with 3cc 1% Buffered Lidocaine (30mg) 1:100,000 Epinephrine using the Halstead technique.

2% Unbuffered Lidocaine 1:100,000 Epinephrine

Intervention Type DRUG

A single IAN block with 3cc 2% Unbuffered Lidocaine (60mg) 1:100,000 Epinephrine using the Halstead technique.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

1% Buffered Lidocaine 1:100,000 Epinephrine

A single IAN block with 3cc 1% Buffered Lidocaine (30mg) 1:100,000 Epinephrine using the Halstead technique.

Intervention Type DRUG

2% Unbuffered Lidocaine 1:100,000 Epinephrine

A single IAN block with 3cc 2% Unbuffered Lidocaine (60mg) 1:100,000 Epinephrine using the Halstead technique.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Xylocaine Xylocaine

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age 10-12 years
* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Class I (Healthy)
* Body Weight: the Interquartile Range (IQR) 33-60Kg for subject ages
* Have ability to speak and read English
* Willingness to participate in two sessions
* No history of adverse reaction to dental anesthetic
* Have bilateral, disease/symptom-free mandibular first molars present

Exclusion Criteria

* Allergy to lidocaine class of anesthetic drugs
* Local anesthetic drug use in past week
* Current symptomatic teeth or oral mucosa
* ASA II or above (including asthma)
Minimum Eligible Age

10 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

12 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jessica Y Lee, DDS,MPH,PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

UNC-Chapel Hill School of Dentistry, Pediatric Dentistry

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

UNC School of Dentistry

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

16-3106

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Buffered Local Anesthetic
NCT05757648 COMPLETED PHASE4