En Bloc Transurethral Resection of Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer

NCT ID: NCT05223491

Last Updated: 2026-01-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

220 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-03-17

Study Completion Date

2025-12-19

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Aim: To compare the surgical method of En Bloc resection to the conventional transurethral resection of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) in terms of complete removal of tumour, specimen quality, and pathological certainty.

Background: NMIBC is a common disease with a 5-year recurrence rate reported as high as 64%. The cornerstone in the treatment of NMIBC is transurethral resection (TURB) where the tumour is dissected in pieces, removed from the bladder, and pathologically examined for potential muscle invasion. As the tumour is fragmented before removal, the method violates basic oncological principles and compromises pathological examination. Hence, TURB is possibly part of the mechanism causing recurrences. En Bloc resection (EBR), where the tumour is removed in toto, can potentially overcome the flaws of conventional TURB, but large randomized trials are needed.

Methods: This project will be a multicentre randomised controlled clinical trial comparing EBR to conventional TURB. Patients with suspected NMIBC tumours with largest tumour diameter ≥1cm and ≤6cm will be randomised to either the intervention group, thus undergoing EBR, or the control group, undergoing conventional TURB. The investigators intend to include 220 patients in total, 110 patients in each group. The RCT will be initiated in 2022.

Perspectives: If EBR can be shown to remove bladder tumours with better pathological quality and certainty, this could potentially spare patients from undergoing surgeries in the future, thereby reducing costs for both patients and society.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

En Bloc

The bladder tumour will be resected en bloc and removed in total, if possible.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

En Bloc resection

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Tumour is resected and removed from the bladder in one piece, if possible.

Conventional TURB

The bladder tumour will be removed by conventional piecemeal resection.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Conventional TURB

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Tumour is resected piecemeal.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

En Bloc resection

Tumour is resected and removed from the bladder in one piece, if possible.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Conventional TURB

Tumour is resected piecemeal.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Demographics: all BMI, smokers and non-smokers
* Primary, papillary, non-solid bladder tumour visualised by flexible cystoscopy
* Tumour diameter measured on CT-scan ≥2cm ≤6cm at largest diameter
* Ability to fully comprehend the information provided and comply with protocol
* Signed consent form
* Patients with multiple tumours can be included if it seems feasible to resect them in one procedure

Exclusion Criteria

* Clinically suspected muscle invasive bladder cancer (invasion in to bladder muscle or extravesical extension visible on CT or solid tumour without papillary elements seen at cystoscopy)
* Tumour located in a bladder diverticulum
* Investigating physician concludes that en bloc resection is not technically possible
* Pregnancy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Aarhus

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Novo Nordisk A/S

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Jørgen Bjerggaard Jensen

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jørgen Bjerggaard Jensen

Professor, DMSc

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Urology, Aalborg University Hospital

Aalborg, , Denmark

Site Status

Department of Urology, Aarhus University Hospital

Aarhus, , Denmark

Site Status

Department of Urology, Herlev Hospital

Herlev, , Denmark

Site Status

Department of Urology, Regional Hospital Gødstrup

Holstebro, , Denmark

Site Status

Department of Urology, Odense University Hospital

Odense, , Denmark

Site Status

Department of Urology, Zealand University Hospital

Roskilde, , Denmark

Site Status

Dept. of Urology, Hospital Lilelbælt, Vejle

Vejle, , Denmark

Site Status

Dept. of Urology, North Estonia Medical Centre

Tallinn, , Estonia

Site Status

Dept. of Urology, Turku University Hospital

Turku, , Finland

Site Status

Urological Center, Paula Stradina Clinical University Hospital

Riga, , Latvia

Site Status

Department of Urology, Vestfold Hospital

Tønsberg, , Norway

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark Estonia Finland Latvia Norway

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

En Bloc

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.