Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
230 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-02-01
2024-12-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
In children removing the Laryngeal Mask Airway under deep inhalational anaesthesia has some advantages compared to awake, but may be associated with higher rate of complications when Laryngeal Mask Airway is removed in supine compared to lateral position. On the other hand deep anaesthesia may cause airway obstruction due to reduction in tone of upper airway muscles in some patients. An oropharangeal airway may prevent this. This aspect had not been studied before and represent a gap in literature.
Study Hypothesis:
Airway complications associated with Laryngeal Mask Airway removal under deep anaesthesia are same with or without insertion of an oral airway. Alternate hypothesis is that airway complications be less if an air way is inserted at the end of anaesthesia.
Objective:
The present study was designed to observe any difference in immediate complication after removal of LMA in supine head down position under deep anaesthesia with or without insertion of an oro-pharyngeal airway. Airway complications that we will observe are desaturation \<92%, stridor, excessive secretions, laryngospasm, retching, vomiting, coughing, trauma to the soft tissues and damage to the teeth.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Laryngeal Mask Airway Removal During Deep Anesthesia in Children
NCT01841866
Optimization for Laryngeal Mask Removal Strategy and Evaluation of Transitional Criteria From PACU in Children
NCT04711174
Laryngeal Mask Airway for Adenoidectomies (LMAA)
NCT02708043
Timing of Withdrawal of the Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) in Children
NCT03105739
Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme Versus Laryngeal Tube
NCT02252120
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group A
An appropriate size oropharyngeal airway (GUEDEL) will be inserted immediately after removal of LMA and time will be noted. (Size will be chosen by placing the flange at the corner of the mouth and tip at the angle of the jaw).
GUEDEL Airway
GUEDEL Airway of size '000,00,0,' and '1' will be used.
Group B
In Group B No oropharyngeal airway (GUEDEL) will be inserted.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
GUEDEL Airway
GUEDEL Airway of size '000,00,0,' and '1' will be used.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with conditions associated with higher incidence of gastrooseophageal reflux
* Presence of active upper respiratory tract infection (URI)
* Emergency Surgery
2 Years
10 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Aga Khan University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Khalid Siddiqui
Assistant Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Aga Khan University Hospital
Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Mason DG, Bingham RM. The laryngeal mask airway in children. Anaesthesia. 1990 Sep;45(9):760-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1990.tb14449.x.
Thomas-Kattappurathu G, Kasisomayajula A, Short J. Best position and depth of anaesthesia for laryngeal mask airway removal in children: A randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015 Sep;32(9):624-30. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000286.
Sinha A, Sood J. Safe removal of LMA in children - at what BIS? Paediatr Anaesth. 2006 Nov;16(11):1144-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2006.01978.x.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2021-5669-19713
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.