Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
66 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2023-09-15
2024-07-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The aim of the study was to describe unsuccessful LMA placement in pediatric patients with objective data.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of the Relationship Between Airway Measurements and Laryngoscopic View in Newborn and Infants
NCT03920748
The Effects of Different Airway Devices on Middle Ear Pressure in Pediatric Patients
NCT02334072
Intubation on a Paediatric Manikin by Emergency Staff: a Comparison of Airtraq and Glidescope
NCT02478203
LMA Placement Techniques and Airway in Children and Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure
NCT06174896
Comparison of Video Laryngoscopy and Direct Laryngoscopy for Nasotracheal Intubation During Pediatric Dental Surgery
NCT04677894
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Similar data are scarce in children. Pediatric laryngeal mask studies report adverse event frequencies ranging from 0% to 10%. These data are limited by the focus on specific surgical procedures or the small sample size resulting in simple univariate or inadequate multivariate analyses. Additionally, although data on adverse events are presented, laryngeal mask failure requiring endotracheal intubation has been reported infrequently.
There are a significant number of studies identifying risk factors for misplacement of LMAs. However, there are no objective data to define misplacement of LMAs.
1-2 mL of lidocaine gel was applied evenly to the classic LMA (Intavent Direct, Maidenhead, UK) capsule. The appropriate size of the LMA device (size 1.5 for 5-10 kg and size 2 for 10-20 kg) was selected according to the manufacturer's recommendation. The LMA was placed by an experienced anesthesiologist, with the patient's head in a neutral position, with a fully deflated cuff, and the patient's mouth was opened, then held parallel to the chest, and the device was advanced along the hard palate. The cuff of the device was inflated with a sufficient amount of air according to the manufacturer's instructions. After LMA placement, patients were divided into two groups as successful (Group S) or unsuccessful (Group non-S) according to bilateral equal chest movement during inspiration, square wave capnography, absence of gastric insufflation, epigastrium auscultation and adequate tidal volume delivery. Another experienced anesthesiologist recorded the set (8 mL/kg) tidal volume (VT), expiratory tidal volume, airway peak pressure, SpO2, EtCO2 measurements in three respiratory cycles. Airway leak (ΔVT); It was calculated by subtracting expiratory VT from the adjusted VT. Airway leak, airway peak pressure, SpO2 and EtCO2 measurement were determined as possible objective predictors for LMA placement failure. Postoperative airway complications; It was determined and recorded as soft tissue trauma, laryngospasm, bronchospasm, and severe cough attack.
The aim of the study was to describe unsuccessful LMA placement in pediatric patients with objective data.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group S
The LMA was successfully placed after the first attempt.
Placement of the laryngeal mask airway
Evaluation of patients' chest movement with manual ventilation, airway leak level, airway pressures, fingertip O2 saturation percentage, and capnogram results will be recorded and the correlation between clinical observation and measured parameters will be evaluated.
Group non-S
The LMA was not placed successfully after the first attempt.
Placement of the laryngeal mask airway
Evaluation of patients' chest movement with manual ventilation, airway leak level, airway pressures, fingertip O2 saturation percentage, and capnogram results will be recorded and the correlation between clinical observation and measured parameters will be evaluated.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Placement of the laryngeal mask airway
Evaluation of patients' chest movement with manual ventilation, airway leak level, airway pressures, fingertip O2 saturation percentage, and capnogram results will be recorded and the correlation between clinical observation and measured parameters will be evaluated.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II
Exclusion Criteria
* Airway difficulty is expected,
* Restriction in opening the mouth,
* Airway malformation,
* Active upper respiratory tract infections,
* History of narrow airway,
* Hyperthyroidism, goiter, airway mass,
* Patients at risk of gastroesophageal reflux and aspiration of stomach contents
2 Years
12 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Samsun University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
OZGUR KOMURCU, 1
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Samsun University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Samsun University
Samsun, Samsun, Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Farbood A, Tayyebi G, Naderi-Boldaji V, Asmarian N. Comparison of the ease of insertion and complications of the classical method of laryngeal mask airway insertion with an alternative method. Saudi J Anaesth. 2023 Apr-Jun;17(2):182-186. doi: 10.4103/sja.sja_681_22. Epub 2023 Mar 10.
Hernandez MR, Klock PA Jr, Ovassapian A. Evolution of the extraglottic airway: a review of its history, applications, and practical tips for success. Anesth Analg. 2012 Feb;114(2):349-68. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31823b6748. Epub 2011 Dec 16.
Van Zundert AAJ, Gatt SP, Kumar CM, Van Zundert TCRV, Pandit JJ. 'Failed supraglottic airway': an algorithm for suboptimally placed supraglottic airway devices based on videolaryngoscopy. Br J Anaesth. 2017 May 1;118(5):645-649. doi: 10.1093/bja/aex093. No abstract available.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SÜKAEK 2023/15/13
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.