Volume Versus Pressure Ventilation on Lung Atelectasis

NCT ID: NCT06076395

Last Updated: 2024-01-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-01-12

Study Completion Date

2024-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This prospective randomized comparative study, to assess post-operative lung atelectasis by comparing calculated lung score using ultrasound between pediatric patients intubated with LMA (laryngeal mask airway) under volume versus pressure controlled modes of ventilation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The initial US scanning will be done prior to the induction of anesthesia. Induction of anesthesia using 4% sevoflurane. Adequate size LMA will be inserted after adequate depth of anesthesia adjusted.

Group A (n=25): will receive pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV). Group B (n=25): will receive volume-controlled ventilation (VCV).

US scanning and Arterial blood gases at the following:

* T1(After maintenance of anesthesia).
* T2 (One minute after applying groin bandage and before extubation).
* T3 (10 minutes after extubation and resumption of adequate regular breathing).
* T4 (30 min post extubation).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cardiac Congenital Defects

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

For group A pressure control ventilation will be adjusted as follows:

Inspiratory pressure will be adjusted to achieve an expired tidal volume of 7 ml/Kg, respiratory rate will be adjusted to achieve an end ETCO2 at 32-35 mmHg, inspiratory to expiratory ratio at 1:2, PEEP at 4 cm H 2 O and FiO2 at 0.5 providing that the maximum airway pressure will be limited to 25 cmH2O.

For group B volume control ventilation will be adjusted as follows:

tidal volume (VT) adjacent to 7 ml/Kg, respiratory rate will be adjusted to achieve an end ETCO2 at 32-35 mmHg and I/E at: 1:2 and positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP)at 4 cmH2O and FiO2 at 0.5.
Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors
Patients will be randomly allocated by a computer-generated list (www.randomization.com) into one of the study groups in the day of the study . The randomization sequence will be concealed in sealed envelopes and will be opened by an independent nurse. The data collector and data analysis will be blind to group assignments.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group A pressure control ventilation

Inspiratory pressure was adjusted to achieve an expired tidal volume of 7 ml/Kg, respiratory rate was adjusted to achieve an end ETCO2 at 32-35 mmHg, inspiratory to expiratory ratio at 1:2, PEEP at 4 cm H2O and FiO2 at 0.5 providing that the maximum airway pressure was limited to 25 cmH2O.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

LMA (Laryngeal Mask Airway)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Pressure controlled versus Volume controlled ventilation using LMA

Group B volume control ventilation

VT adjacent to 7 ml/Kg, respiratory rate was adjusted to achieve an end ETCO2 at 32-35 mmHg and I/E at: 1:2 and PEEP at 4 cm H2O and FiO2 at 0.5.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

LMA (Laryngeal Mask Airway)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Pressure controlled versus Volume controlled ventilation using LMA

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

LMA (Laryngeal Mask Airway)

Pressure controlled versus Volume controlled ventilation using LMA

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Lung Ultrasound

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Pediatric patients undergoing cardiac catheterization procedures. Age from 2 years to 6 years of both sexes.

Exclusion Criteria

* Lung score at different times.
* Age \<2 years and \>6 years.
* Preoperative mechanical ventilation.
* Heart failure (any inotropic support infusion).
* Patients with any lung diseases( acute respiratory disease, pulmonary or lung
* diseases).
* Lung consolidation score ≥ 2 before insertion of LMA.
* Any contraindication for LMA insertion (risk for aspiration, and/or airway
* obstruction below the larynx.)
* Procedures exceeding 120 mins duration.
Minimum Eligible Age

2 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

6 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Kasr El Aini Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dalia Saad Abd-El Kader

assistant professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Amel Hanfy Abo El- Ela

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Kasr El Aini Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Dalia Saad

Cairo, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Hedenstierna G. Airway closure, atelectasis and gas exchange during anaesthesia. Minerva Anestesiol. 2002 May;68(5):332-6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12029240 (View on PubMed)

Stefanik E, Drewnowska O, Lisowska B, Turek B. Causes, Effects and Methods of Monitoring Gas Exchange Disturbances during Equine General Anaesthesia. Animals (Basel). 2021 Jul 9;11(7):2049. doi: 10.3390/ani11072049.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34359177 (View on PubMed)

Chiumello D, Mongodi S, Algieri I, Vergani GL, Orlando A, Via G, Crimella F, Cressoni M, Mojoli F. Assessment of Lung Aeration and Recruitment by CT Scan and Ultrasound in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Patients. Crit Care Med. 2018 Nov;46(11):1761-1768. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003340.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30048331 (View on PubMed)

Rodriguez-Fanjul J, Corsini I, Orti CS, Bobillo-Perez S, Raimondi F. Lung ultrasound to evaluate lung recruitment in neonates with respiratory distress (RELUS study). Pediatr Pulmonol. 2022 Oct;57(10):2502-2510. doi: 10.1002/ppul.26066. Epub 2022 Jul 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35792663 (View on PubMed)

Li X, Liu B, Wang Y, Xiong W, Zhang Y, Bao D, Liang Y, Li L, Liu G, Jin X. The effects of laryngeal mask airway versus endotracheal tube on atelectasis in patients undergoing general anesthesia assessed by lung ultrasound: A protocol for a prospective, randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2022 Sep 9;17(9):e0273410. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273410. eCollection 2022.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 36084154 (View on PubMed)

Acosta CM, Maidana GA, Jacovitti D, Belaunzaran A, Cereceda S, Rae E, Molina A, Gonorazky S, Bohm SH, Tusman G. Accuracy of transthoracic lung ultrasound for diagnosing anesthesia-induced atelectasis in children. Anesthesiology. 2014 Jun;120(6):1370-9. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000231.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24662376 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MS-96-2023

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Assessment of Pediatric Challenging Airway
NCT06443424 NOT_YET_RECRUITING