The Comparison of Airway Sealing With the Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) Supreme at Different Intracuff Pressure in Children
NCT ID: NCT01738854
Last Updated: 2014-04-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
36 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-11-30
2013-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
LMA Placement Techniques and Airway in Children and Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure
NCT06174896
Fiberoptic Evaluation of the LMA(Laryngel Mask Airway) Position During Anesthesia With Spontaneous Respiration or Controlled Ventilation in Children
NCT02220075
Comparison of LMA Proseal and LMA Supreme for Efficient Ventilation During Lateral Positioned Laparoscopic Surgeres
NCT02852135
Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme Versus Laryngeal Tube
NCT02252120
The Comparison of Two Different Methods of Partial Inflation of Cuff for Facile Insertion of Laryngeal Mask Airway in Pediatric Patients
NCT01435239
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
intra-cuff pressure 40 cmH2O
intracuff pressure by cuff pressure manometer
36 patients are randomly allocated according to random sequence of the intracuff pressure 40, 60 and 80 cmH2O. After insertion of LMA supreme, we confirm adequate ventilation. And then we measure OLP and leakage volume at intra-cuff pressure 40, 60 and 80 cmH2O adjusted by cuff pressure manometer according to random sequence of the intracuff pressure.
intra-cuff pressure 60 cmH2O
intracuff pressure by cuff pressure manometer
36 patients are randomly allocated according to random sequence of the intracuff pressure 40, 60 and 80 cmH2O. After insertion of LMA supreme, we confirm adequate ventilation. And then we measure OLP and leakage volume at intra-cuff pressure 40, 60 and 80 cmH2O adjusted by cuff pressure manometer according to random sequence of the intracuff pressure.
intra-cuff pressure 80 cmH2O
intracuff pressure by cuff pressure manometer
36 patients are randomly allocated according to random sequence of the intracuff pressure 40, 60 and 80 cmH2O. After insertion of LMA supreme, we confirm adequate ventilation. And then we measure OLP and leakage volume at intra-cuff pressure 40, 60 and 80 cmH2O adjusted by cuff pressure manometer according to random sequence of the intracuff pressure.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
intracuff pressure by cuff pressure manometer
36 patients are randomly allocated according to random sequence of the intracuff pressure 40, 60 and 80 cmH2O. After insertion of LMA supreme, we confirm adequate ventilation. And then we measure OLP and leakage volume at intra-cuff pressure 40, 60 and 80 cmH2O adjusted by cuff pressure manometer according to random sequence of the intracuff pressure.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* scheduled for elective surgery undergoing general anesthesia using LMA supreme 1.5-2.5
Exclusion Criteria
* reactive airway disease,
* gastroesophageal reflux disease,
* chronic respiratory disease,
* a history of an upper respiratory tract infection
9 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Yonsei University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Severance hospital
Seoul, Seoul, South Korea
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Zhang L, Seet E, Mehta V, Subramanyam R, Ankichetty SP, Wong DT, Chung F. Oropharyngeal leak pressure with the laryngeal mask airway Supreme at different intracuff pressures: a randomized controlled trial. Can J Anaesth. 2011 Jul;58(7):624-629. doi: 10.1007/s12630-011-9514-6. Epub 2011 Apr 30.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1-2012-0043
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.