Simulated Comparison of Standard Versus Rotational Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion in Novice Anaesthesiologists.
NCT ID: NCT05544838
Last Updated: 2022-09-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
13 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-10-02
2021-10-02
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Hypothesis:
The rotational LMA insertion technique is easy to understand and practice than the standard LMA insertion technique at the beginning of airway management training among the novice anesthesiologists.
Hypothesis:
The rotational LMA insertion technique is easy to understand and practice than the standard LMA insertion technique at the beginning of airway management training among the novice anesthesiologists.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Simulated Standard Versus Modified Jaw Thrust I-gel Insertion Technique in Novice Anesthesiologists
NCT05545163
Comparison of Ease of I-gel Insertion With Two Different Techniques in Adults
NCT04109898
Comparison of Weight-based Versus External Ear-size Based Technique for Selection of Laryngeal Mask Airway in Pediatric Surgical Patients.
NCT03931122
Comparison Among Three Different Video Scope Guided Nasotracheal Intubation.
NCT05534451
Evaluation of Hemodynamic Response to Laryngoscopy and Endotracheal Intubation Using Conventional Laryngoscope Versus C-MAC Video Laryngoscope in Patients Undergoing Elective Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) Surgery
NCT04433884
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
* LMA insertion time duration is the time taken to complete LMA insertion; from the holding of device till the confirmation of chest movement (artificial lungs inflation in manikin).
* The correlation of previous information for airway device, insertion techniques, general or specific work experience in airway management with the ease of both study's insertion techniques will be asked by participant's through the questionnaire at the start of study.
* The trainees will be asked at the end of study for preferred insertion method at novice level on the basis of learning method and practical conduct (user friendly)
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
LMA with standard insertion technique
Standard LMA insertion technique; LMA held like a pen and index finger placed at the junction of LMA tube and cuff. Index finger used to press LMA against hard palate and posterior pharyngeal wall until definite resistance felt at the base of hypopharynx. LMA then held with non- dominant hand and index finger removed.
No interventions assigned to this group
Rotational LMA insertion technique
Rotational LMA insertion; LMA inserted like guedel airway insertion: LMA proximally grasped close to anaesthesia circuit attachment. Insertion was conducted with LMA cuff facing towards nose, hard palate and then advanced into the base of hypopharynx until resistance was felt. At this point, LMA rotated at 180 degree anti-clockwise and LMA tube black line positioned and confirmed on the nasal side.
LMA insertion with standard technique
Standard LMA insertion technique; LMA held like a pen and index finger placed at the junction of LMA tube and cuff. Index finger used to press LMA against hard palate and posterior pharyngeal wall until definite resistance felt at the base of hypopharynx. LMA then held with non- dominant hand and index finger removed.
Rotational LMA insertion; LMA inserted like guedel airway insertion: LMA proximally grasped close to anaesthesia circuit attachment. Insertion was conducted with LMA cuff facing towards nose, hard palate and then advanced into the base of hypopharynx until resistance was felt. At this point, LMA rotated at 180 degree anti-clockwise and LMA tube black line positioned and confirmed on the nasal side.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
LMA insertion with standard technique
Standard LMA insertion technique; LMA held like a pen and index finger placed at the junction of LMA tube and cuff. Index finger used to press LMA against hard palate and posterior pharyngeal wall until definite resistance felt at the base of hypopharynx. LMA then held with non- dominant hand and index finger removed.
Rotational LMA insertion; LMA inserted like guedel airway insertion: LMA proximally grasped close to anaesthesia circuit attachment. Insertion was conducted with LMA cuff facing towards nose, hard palate and then advanced into the base of hypopharynx until resistance was felt. At this point, LMA rotated at 180 degree anti-clockwise and LMA tube black line positioned and confirmed on the nasal side.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Using adult mannequin
Exclusion Criteria
* Participant's refusal
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Aga Khan University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Dileep Kumar
Assistant Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Aga Khan University Hospital
Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kumar D, Khan M, Ishaq M. Rotational vs. standard smooth laryngeal mask airway insertion in adults. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2012 May;22(5):275-9.
Komasawa N, Berg BW. Simulation-based Airway Management Training for Anesthesiologists - A Brief Review of its Essential Role in Skills Training for Clinical Competency. J Educ Perioper Med. 2017 Oct 1;19(4):E612. eCollection 2017 Oct-Dec.
Kennedy CC, Cannon EK, Warner DO, Cook DA. Advanced airway management simulation training in medical education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care Med. 2014 Jan;42(1):169-78. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31829a721f.
Lee DW, Kang MJ, Kim YH, Lee JH, Cho KW, Kim YW, Cho JH, Kim YS, Hong CK, Hwang SY. Performance of intubation with 4 different airway devices by unskilled rescuers: manikin study. Am J Emerg Med. 2015 May;33(5):691-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.03.006. Epub 2015 Mar 12.
Liti A, Giusti GD, Gili A, Giontella M, Dell'Omo S, Camerlingo V, Fronteddu A, Galazzi A, Bambi S. Insertion of four different types of supraglottic airway devices by emergency nurses. A mannequin-based simulation study. Acta Biomed. 2020 Nov 30;91(12-S):e2020016. doi: 10.23750/abm.v91i12-S.10832.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2022-6256-22361
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.