Simulated Comparison of Standard Versus Rotational Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion in Novice Anaesthesiologists.

NCT ID: NCT05544838

Last Updated: 2022-09-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

13 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-10-02

Study Completion Date

2021-10-02

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary objective of study was to compare insertion ease by standard and rotational LMA insertion technique on basis of LMA insertion attempts and insertion time duration. The secondary objective of study was to analyse impact of prior information for airway device, insertion techniques, general or specific work experience in airway management with ease of both insertion techniques. And, tertiary objective of study was to analyse the trainee's preference insertion technique on basis of learning method and practical adaptability.

Hypothesis:

The rotational LMA insertion technique is easy to understand and practice than the standard LMA insertion technique at the beginning of airway management training among the novice anesthesiologists.

Hypothesis:

The rotational LMA insertion technique is easy to understand and practice than the standard LMA insertion technique at the beginning of airway management training among the novice anesthesiologists.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

* LMA insertion attempts are the number of LMA insertion attempts with each study's insertion technique. The 10 insertion attempts will be performed with each insertion technique by trainees.
* LMA insertion time duration is the time taken to complete LMA insertion; from the holding of device till the confirmation of chest movement (artificial lungs inflation in manikin).
* The correlation of previous information for airway device, insertion techniques, general or specific work experience in airway management with the ease of both study's insertion techniques will be asked by participant's through the questionnaire at the start of study.
* The trainees will be asked at the end of study for preferred insertion method at novice level on the basis of learning method and practical conduct (user friendly)

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Training Group, Sensitivity

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Each novice resident will place ten times LMA insertion with each insertion technique in randomised cross over manner by dividing the residents in two groups (5 residents in each group), by draw method. The one group will place LMA with standard insertion technique and other group will place by rotational LMA insertion technique, then after, the groups will switch over with concerned insertion techniques
Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

LMA with standard insertion technique

Standard LMA insertion technique; LMA held like a pen and index finger placed at the junction of LMA tube and cuff. Index finger used to press LMA against hard palate and posterior pharyngeal wall until definite resistance felt at the base of hypopharynx. LMA then held with non- dominant hand and index finger removed.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Rotational LMA insertion technique

Rotational LMA insertion; LMA inserted like guedel airway insertion: LMA proximally grasped close to anaesthesia circuit attachment. Insertion was conducted with LMA cuff facing towards nose, hard palate and then advanced into the base of hypopharynx until resistance was felt. At this point, LMA rotated at 180 degree anti-clockwise and LMA tube black line positioned and confirmed on the nasal side.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

LMA insertion with standard technique

Intervention Type DEVICE

Standard LMA insertion technique; LMA held like a pen and index finger placed at the junction of LMA tube and cuff. Index finger used to press LMA against hard palate and posterior pharyngeal wall until definite resistance felt at the base of hypopharynx. LMA then held with non- dominant hand and index finger removed.

Rotational LMA insertion; LMA inserted like guedel airway insertion: LMA proximally grasped close to anaesthesia circuit attachment. Insertion was conducted with LMA cuff facing towards nose, hard palate and then advanced into the base of hypopharynx until resistance was felt. At this point, LMA rotated at 180 degree anti-clockwise and LMA tube black line positioned and confirmed on the nasal side.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

LMA insertion with standard technique

Standard LMA insertion technique; LMA held like a pen and index finger placed at the junction of LMA tube and cuff. Index finger used to press LMA against hard palate and posterior pharyngeal wall until definite resistance felt at the base of hypopharynx. LMA then held with non- dominant hand and index finger removed.

Rotational LMA insertion; LMA inserted like guedel airway insertion: LMA proximally grasped close to anaesthesia circuit attachment. Insertion was conducted with LMA cuff facing towards nose, hard palate and then advanced into the base of hypopharynx until resistance was felt. At this point, LMA rotated at 180 degree anti-clockwise and LMA tube black line positioned and confirmed on the nasal side.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Rotational LMA insertion technique

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* First year anaesthesia trainee
* Using adult mannequin

Exclusion Criteria

* Paediatric mannequin
* Participant's refusal
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Aga Khan University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dileep Kumar

Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Aga Khan University Hospital

Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Pakistan

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kumar D, Khan M, Ishaq M. Rotational vs. standard smooth laryngeal mask airway insertion in adults. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2012 May;22(5):275-9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22538029 (View on PubMed)

Komasawa N, Berg BW. Simulation-based Airway Management Training for Anesthesiologists - A Brief Review of its Essential Role in Skills Training for Clinical Competency. J Educ Perioper Med. 2017 Oct 1;19(4):E612. eCollection 2017 Oct-Dec.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29766036 (View on PubMed)

Kennedy CC, Cannon EK, Warner DO, Cook DA. Advanced airway management simulation training in medical education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care Med. 2014 Jan;42(1):169-78. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31829a721f.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24220691 (View on PubMed)

Lee DW, Kang MJ, Kim YH, Lee JH, Cho KW, Kim YW, Cho JH, Kim YS, Hong CK, Hwang SY. Performance of intubation with 4 different airway devices by unskilled rescuers: manikin study. Am J Emerg Med. 2015 May;33(5):691-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.03.006. Epub 2015 Mar 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25800412 (View on PubMed)

Liti A, Giusti GD, Gili A, Giontella M, Dell'Omo S, Camerlingo V, Fronteddu A, Galazzi A, Bambi S. Insertion of four different types of supraglottic airway devices by emergency nurses. A mannequin-based simulation study. Acta Biomed. 2020 Nov 30;91(12-S):e2020016. doi: 10.23750/abm.v91i12-S.10832.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 33263351 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2022-6256-22361

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.