Expanding Fertility Care to Poor and Low Resourced Settings Study

NCT ID: NCT05205733

Last Updated: 2024-02-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-05-24

Study Completion Date

2024-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The investigators currently lack an understanding of barriers to completing the male factor infertility evaluation. Furthermore, as the investigators continue to expand access to fertility treatment particularly within low-resourced settings, it is important that all aspects of infertility within a couple are equally explored. The COVID-19 pandemic has disproportionately affected low-income communities and communities of color at greater rates in terms of not only disease morbidity/mortality but how medical systems are accessed and care is delivered.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This pilot study was designed to help providers identify barriers to completing the basic infertility work-up in a low resource setting with a focus on accessibility and feasibility of semen analysis testing. As a pilot study, a total of 60 male partners of patients who are seeking infertility treatment at the Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital Gynecology clinic will be recruited. Participants will be randomized to completing a semen analysis by either the standard in-clinic test or an at-home sperm testing kit. The investigators hypothesis is that there will be an increase in participants completing their semen analysis when using the at-home sperm testing kit as opposed to having to come to the lab.

Specific Aims:

1. To identify barriers to completing a semen analysis.
2. To compare barriers unique to completing an in-clinic versus at-home testing.
3. To compare satisfaction scores with in-clinic versus at-home testing.
4. To compare the time to complete the semen analysis with in-clinic versus at-home testing.
5. To compare the time to initiating treatment after completing in-clinic versus at-home testing.

Patients seen at Zuckerberg San Francisco General who are currently undergoing an infertility evaluation as a part of the basic infertility assessment will be contacted. Consented participants will be randomized to complete an at home vs. lab semen analysis. After the semen analysis is completed, participants will be sent a comprehensive questionnaire regarding their experience, level of satisfaction, and barriers with completion of the recent semen analysis. Participants will be given 3 months to complete the semen analysis. If not completed in this timeframe, participants will be sent a different comprehensive questionnaire regarding their barriers with completion of the semen analysis. Additional clinical questions include time from semen analysis order to completion as well as time from semen analysis completion to start of treatment plan.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Healthy Male Infertility Infertility, Male Fertility Disorders

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Participants are assigned to complete either a mail-in or in-clinic semen analysis.
Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

In-Clinic Semen Analysis Testing

Men needing semen analysis for infertility work-up.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

No in-clinic semen analysis testing

Men needing semen analysis for infertility work-up.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Mail-in semen analysis kit

Intervention Type OTHER

Presumably an easier, convenient, and more comfortable way to provide a semen analysis with an in-home mail-in semen analysis kit

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Mail-in semen analysis kit

Presumably an easier, convenient, and more comfortable way to provide a semen analysis with an in-home mail-in semen analysis kit

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Fellow Health Semen Analysis

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All English or Spanish speaking male partners of female patients undergoing an infertility work-up evaluation at Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and recommended to undergo a semen analysis as a part of this workup.

Exclusion Criteria

* If they do not speak English or Spanish they will be excluded
* If they are under the age of 18 y.o
* If they are not recommended to undergo a semen analysis as a part of the infertility evaluation
* If they are unable to produce a semen sample.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

64 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of California, San Francisco

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Yanett Anaya, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of California, San Francisco

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of California San Francisco

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Alisha T Tolani, M.D.

Role: CONTACT

415.353.7475

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Alisha Tolani, MD

Role: primary

415-353-7475

Elena Hoskin

Role: backup

4153537475

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bradshaw A, Ballon-Landa E, Owusu R, Hsieh TC. Poor Compliance With Postvasectomy Semen Testing: Analysis of Factors and Barriers. Urology. 2020 Feb;136:146-151. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.10.026. Epub 2019 Nov 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31778681 (View on PubMed)

Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Diagnostic evaluation of the infertile male: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2015 Mar;103(3):e18-25. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.12.103. Epub 2015 Jan 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25597249 (View on PubMed)

Infertility Workup for the Women's Health Specialist: ACOG Committee Opinion, Number 781. Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jun;133(6):e377-e384. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003271.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31135764 (View on PubMed)

Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Disparities in access to effective treatment for infertility in the United States: an Ethics Committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2015 Nov;104(5):1104-10. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.07.1139. Epub 2015 Sep 10.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26364838 (View on PubMed)

Herndon CN, Anaya Y, Noel M, Cakmak H, Cedars MI. Outcomes from a university-based low-cost in vitro fertilization program providing access to care for a low-resource socioculturally diverse urban community. Fertil Steril. 2017 Oct;108(4):642-649.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.06.035. Epub 2017 Sep 2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28874259 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

21-33495

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.