A Comparison of Oral Sedation-related Events of Three Multiagent Oral Sedation Regimens in Pediatric Dental Patients
NCT ID: NCT05126459
Last Updated: 2024-10-02
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-02-14
2023-04-12
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Nitrous Oxide Prior to Intranasal Midazolam for Moderate Dental Sedation in Pediatric Patients
NCT04083105
Midazolam and Ketamine Effect Administered Through the Nose for Sedation of Children for Dental Treatment
NCT02447289
Pain and Anxiety in Pediatric Dentistry: Computer-Controlled vs. Traditional Anesthesia
NCT07156487
Local Anesthesia With Computerized Device for Restorative Procedures in Pediatric Patients
NCT05531435
Effectiveness of Children Experiencing Nitrous Oxide/Oxygen Inhalation Sedation at an Assessment Visit Before Having Treatment.
NCT06056492
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The included patients were randomly allocated into one of three sedation groups by drawing a concealed folded paper from an opaque randomization bag after obtaining parent consent. All papers that were used in the randomization had the same size and texture. The pediatric dental resident and attending faculty were informed with medication combination once randomized allocation had been made.
The study groups were as follows: Group 1 received Midazolam (0.5- 0.75 mg/kg), Meperidine (1.5-2.0 mg/kg), and Hydroxyzine (1.5- 2.0 mg/kg), Group 2 received Meperidine (1.5-2 mg/kg) and Hydroxyzine (1.5- 2.0 mg/kg). Group 3 received Midazolam (0.5- 0.75 mg/kg) and Hydroxyzine (1.5- 2mg/kg).
Clinical Procedure Calculations based on the child's weight of maximum local anesthetic delivery, oral sedation medication dosages, and reversal agents were completed prior to delivery of medication. The reversal agent used for benzodiazepines was Flumazenil, 0.01mg/Kg with a maximum of 0.2 mg/dose. While the reversal agent for Meperidine was Naloxone, calculated as 0.1 mg/Kg up to 2 mg.
After obtaining proper consents, all patients were placed in passive protective stabilization (Joey BoardĀ®, Joey Board, Queen Creek, AZ) in the event the child was to become uncooperative and to maintain patient stability during treatment, as coordination could be impaired. Nitrous oxide/Oxygen (N2O/O2) was used in all sedations and administered at a flow rate of four to six L/minute (30-50% N2O/ 10-50% O2) with 100% O2 given for five minutes pre- and postoperatively. All operating dentists followed standard sedation protocol at standard sedation protocol in Loma Linda University Pediatric Dentistry Clinic adapted from the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (AAPD) guidelines.8 Routine dental care was provided with local anesthesia with rubber dam or isoliteĀ® isolation. Xylocaine (2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine) was used for local anesthesia in all cases and did not exceed 4 mg/kg lidocaine. Once AAPD discharge criteria8 were met, the patient was released to the parent. At that time, postoperative care instructions, including emergency contact numbers and recommendation for over-the-counter pain medications, if needed, were provided both verbally and in written form.
The dentist performing each sedation was asked to complete a detailed questionnaire that provided details about the patient's behavior from the time of drug administration to the time of discharge (Survey 1). In addition, parents received two telephone interviews regarding events that occurred after the sedation session. An investigator conducted all phone interviews. These phone interviews took place at eight hours (Survey 2) and 24 hours (Survey 3) after discharge.
For all three of the surveys, questions were designed to elucidate patient physical signs and/or behaviors that fell into the following categories: (1) sleep disturbances; (2) gastrointestinal side effects; (3) non-aggressive behavior changes; (4) residual central nervous system alterations; (5) respiratory depression; (6) musculoskeletal effects; (7) physical reactions; (8) existence of a paradoxical reaction; and (9) amnesic effects. Information on the pre-sedation cooperation level and overall effectiveness of the sedation (rated as ineffective, effective, very effective, or overly sedated) were obtained from the procedural sedation record (adopted from AAPD) corresponding to each case.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Regimen 1
Oral administration - Hydroxyzine (1.5 - 2mg/kg) Oral administration - Meperidine (1.5 -2 mg/kg) Oral administration - Midazolam (0.5- 0.75 mg/kg) Inhalation - Nitrous oxide/oxygen (30-50% N2O/ 70-50% O2)
Regimen 1
Administer orally after informed consent obtained prior to any dental procedure. Hydroxyzine (1.5- 2mg/kg) + Meperidine (1.5 -2 mg/kg) + Midazolam (0.5- 0.75 mg/kg) In combination with oral drugs stated above, administeration via inhalation of Nitrous oxide/oxygen (30-50% N2O/ 70-50% O2) via inhalation.
Regimen 2
Oral administration - Hydroxyzine (1.5 - 2mg/kg) Oral administration- Meperidine (1.5 -2 mg/kg) Inhalation - Nitrous oxide/oxygen (30-50% N2O/ 70-50% O2) -
Regimen #2
Administer orally after informed consent obtained prior to any dental procedure. Hydroxyzine (1.5 - 2mg/kg) + Meperidine (1.5 -2 mg/kg). Administer Nitrous oxide/oxygen (30-50% N2O/ 70-50% O2) via inhalation.
Regimen 3
Oral administration - Hydroxyzine (1.5 - 2mg/kg) Oral administration - Midazolam (0.5- 0.75 mg/kg) Inhalation- Nitrous oxide/oxygen (30-50% N2O/ 70-50% O2)
Regimen #3
Administer orally after informed consent obtained prior to any dental procedure. Hydroxyzine (1.5 - 2mg/kg) + Midazolam (0.5- 0.75 mg/kg). Administer Nitrous oxide/oxygen (30-50% N2O/ 70-50% O2) via inhalation.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Regimen 1
Administer orally after informed consent obtained prior to any dental procedure. Hydroxyzine (1.5- 2mg/kg) + Meperidine (1.5 -2 mg/kg) + Midazolam (0.5- 0.75 mg/kg) In combination with oral drugs stated above, administeration via inhalation of Nitrous oxide/oxygen (30-50% N2O/ 70-50% O2) via inhalation.
Regimen #2
Administer orally after informed consent obtained prior to any dental procedure. Hydroxyzine (1.5 - 2mg/kg) + Meperidine (1.5 -2 mg/kg). Administer Nitrous oxide/oxygen (30-50% N2O/ 70-50% O2) via inhalation.
Regimen #3
Administer orally after informed consent obtained prior to any dental procedure. Hydroxyzine (1.5 - 2mg/kg) + Midazolam (0.5- 0.75 mg/kg). Administer Nitrous oxide/oxygen (30-50% N2O/ 70-50% O2) via inhalation.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age 3-7 years old, Healthy ( ASA-1 )
* No gender, race or ethnic restrictions.
* Reason for conscious oral sedation is situational anxiety in the dental operatory
Exclusion Criteria
* History upper respiratory tract infection within two weeks of treatment
* Children taking any medication within the two weeks prior to scheduled dental treatment
* Sedation within the last six months
* Body mass index (BMI) greater than the 95th percentile for their age and sex
* Failing to drink the entire amount of sedation medications dispensed
3 Years
7 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Loma Linda University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jung-Wei Chen, DDS, MS, PhD
Program Director, Pediatric Dentistry
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jung-Wei Chen, DDS,MS,PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Loma Linda University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Loma Linda University
Loma Linda, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
5190213
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.