A Comparison of Oral Sedation-related Events of Three Multiagent Oral Sedation Regimens in Pediatric Dental Patients

NCT ID: NCT05126459

Last Updated: 2024-10-02

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-02-14

Study Completion Date

2023-04-12

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will compare the post sedation events from three different multi-drug oral sedation regimens in order to help pediatric dentists determine the best course of action for their patients and prepare parents appropriately and caution them about the expected effects. Patients will be evaluated for adverse effects within two time periods at 8 and 24 hours post oral sedation procedure using surveys.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Inclusion criteria included patients of record who were scheduled to undergo oral sedation at Loma Linda University Pediatric Dentistry clinic for dental treatment. Children ages ranged from 3 to 6 years old with no medical issues, ASA-1. The reason for oral sedation was situational anxiety in the dental operatory. Exclusion criteria included children who presented with a history of: (1) acute illness; (2) upper respiratory tract infection within two weeks of treatment; (3) taking any medication within the two weeks prior to scheduled dental treatment; and (4) a body mass index (BMI) greater than the 95th percentile for their age and gender. A total sample of 60 healthy pediatric patients were included in this study with were no gender, race, or ethnic significant difference.

The included patients were randomly allocated into one of three sedation groups by drawing a concealed folded paper from an opaque randomization bag after obtaining parent consent. All papers that were used in the randomization had the same size and texture. The pediatric dental resident and attending faculty were informed with medication combination once randomized allocation had been made.

The study groups were as follows: Group 1 received Midazolam (0.5- 0.75 mg/kg), Meperidine (1.5-2.0 mg/kg), and Hydroxyzine (1.5- 2.0 mg/kg), Group 2 received Meperidine (1.5-2 mg/kg) and Hydroxyzine (1.5- 2.0 mg/kg). Group 3 received Midazolam (0.5- 0.75 mg/kg) and Hydroxyzine (1.5- 2mg/kg).

Clinical Procedure Calculations based on the child's weight of maximum local anesthetic delivery, oral sedation medication dosages, and reversal agents were completed prior to delivery of medication. The reversal agent used for benzodiazepines was Flumazenil, 0.01mg/Kg with a maximum of 0.2 mg/dose. While the reversal agent for Meperidine was Naloxone, calculated as 0.1 mg/Kg up to 2 mg.

After obtaining proper consents, all patients were placed in passive protective stabilization (Joey BoardĀ®, Joey Board, Queen Creek, AZ) in the event the child was to become uncooperative and to maintain patient stability during treatment, as coordination could be impaired. Nitrous oxide/Oxygen (N2O/O2) was used in all sedations and administered at a flow rate of four to six L/minute (30-50% N2O/ 10-50% O2) with 100% O2 given for five minutes pre- and postoperatively. All operating dentists followed standard sedation protocol at standard sedation protocol in Loma Linda University Pediatric Dentistry Clinic adapted from the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (AAPD) guidelines.8 Routine dental care was provided with local anesthesia with rubber dam or isoliteĀ® isolation. Xylocaine (2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine) was used for local anesthesia in all cases and did not exceed 4 mg/kg lidocaine. Once AAPD discharge criteria8 were met, the patient was released to the parent. At that time, postoperative care instructions, including emergency contact numbers and recommendation for over-the-counter pain medications, if needed, were provided both verbally and in written form.

The dentist performing each sedation was asked to complete a detailed questionnaire that provided details about the patient's behavior from the time of drug administration to the time of discharge (Survey 1). In addition, parents received two telephone interviews regarding events that occurred after the sedation session. An investigator conducted all phone interviews. These phone interviews took place at eight hours (Survey 2) and 24 hours (Survey 3) after discharge.

For all three of the surveys, questions were designed to elucidate patient physical signs and/or behaviors that fell into the following categories: (1) sleep disturbances; (2) gastrointestinal side effects; (3) non-aggressive behavior changes; (4) residual central nervous system alterations; (5) respiratory depression; (6) musculoskeletal effects; (7) physical reactions; (8) existence of a paradoxical reaction; and (9) amnesic effects. Information on the pre-sedation cooperation level and overall effectiveness of the sedation (rated as ineffective, effective, very effective, or overly sedated) were obtained from the procedural sedation record (adopted from AAPD) corresponding to each case.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Anxiety, Dental Dental Decay

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Regimen 1

Oral administration - Hydroxyzine (1.5 - 2mg/kg) Oral administration - Meperidine (1.5 -2 mg/kg) Oral administration - Midazolam (0.5- 0.75 mg/kg) Inhalation - Nitrous oxide/oxygen (30-50% N2O/ 70-50% O2)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Regimen 1

Intervention Type COMBINATION_PRODUCT

Administer orally after informed consent obtained prior to any dental procedure. Hydroxyzine (1.5- 2mg/kg) + Meperidine (1.5 -2 mg/kg) + Midazolam (0.5- 0.75 mg/kg) In combination with oral drugs stated above, administeration via inhalation of Nitrous oxide/oxygen (30-50% N2O/ 70-50% O2) via inhalation.

Regimen 2

Oral administration - Hydroxyzine (1.5 - 2mg/kg) Oral administration- Meperidine (1.5 -2 mg/kg) Inhalation - Nitrous oxide/oxygen (30-50% N2O/ 70-50% O2) -

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Regimen #2

Intervention Type COMBINATION_PRODUCT

Administer orally after informed consent obtained prior to any dental procedure. Hydroxyzine (1.5 - 2mg/kg) + Meperidine (1.5 -2 mg/kg). Administer Nitrous oxide/oxygen (30-50% N2O/ 70-50% O2) via inhalation.

Regimen 3

Oral administration - Hydroxyzine (1.5 - 2mg/kg) Oral administration - Midazolam (0.5- 0.75 mg/kg) Inhalation- Nitrous oxide/oxygen (30-50% N2O/ 70-50% O2)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Regimen #3

Intervention Type COMBINATION_PRODUCT

Administer orally after informed consent obtained prior to any dental procedure. Hydroxyzine (1.5 - 2mg/kg) + Midazolam (0.5- 0.75 mg/kg). Administer Nitrous oxide/oxygen (30-50% N2O/ 70-50% O2) via inhalation.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Regimen 1

Administer orally after informed consent obtained prior to any dental procedure. Hydroxyzine (1.5- 2mg/kg) + Meperidine (1.5 -2 mg/kg) + Midazolam (0.5- 0.75 mg/kg) In combination with oral drugs stated above, administeration via inhalation of Nitrous oxide/oxygen (30-50% N2O/ 70-50% O2) via inhalation.

Intervention Type COMBINATION_PRODUCT

Regimen #2

Administer orally after informed consent obtained prior to any dental procedure. Hydroxyzine (1.5 - 2mg/kg) + Meperidine (1.5 -2 mg/kg). Administer Nitrous oxide/oxygen (30-50% N2O/ 70-50% O2) via inhalation.

Intervention Type COMBINATION_PRODUCT

Regimen #3

Administer orally after informed consent obtained prior to any dental procedure. Hydroxyzine (1.5 - 2mg/kg) + Midazolam (0.5- 0.75 mg/kg). Administer Nitrous oxide/oxygen (30-50% N2O/ 70-50% O2) via inhalation.

Intervention Type COMBINATION_PRODUCT

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients scheduled to undergo oral sedation appointments in Loma Linda University Pediatric dental clinic for operative procedures.
* Age 3-7 years old, Healthy ( ASA-1 )
* No gender, race or ethnic restrictions.
* Reason for conscious oral sedation is situational anxiety in the dental operatory

Exclusion Criteria

* Children with a history of acute illness
* History upper respiratory tract infection within two weeks of treatment
* Children taking any medication within the two weeks prior to scheduled dental treatment
* Sedation within the last six months
* Body mass index (BMI) greater than the 95th percentile for their age and sex
* Failing to drink the entire amount of sedation medications dispensed
Minimum Eligible Age

3 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

7 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Loma Linda University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jung-Wei Chen, DDS, MS, PhD

Program Director, Pediatric Dentistry

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jung-Wei Chen, DDS,MS,PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Loma Linda University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Loma Linda University

Loma Linda, California, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

5190213

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Buffered Local Anesthetic
NCT05757648 COMPLETED PHASE4