Comparison of Pain Perception in A Group of Pediatric Patients Undergoing Maxillary Primary Molar Extraction Using A Novel Anesthetic Device Versus Traditional Infiltration

NCT ID: NCT07124052

Last Updated: 2025-08-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

2 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-08-18

Study Completion Date

2026-09-18

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study aims to compare the pain felt by children during tooth extraction using two different techniques for giving local anesthesia. One group of children will receive anesthesia using a modern electronic device called SleeperOne® 5, which controls the flow and pressure of the anesthesia to reduce pain. The other group will receive anesthesia using the traditional syringe method, which is more commonly used in dental clinics.

The study will include children between the ages of 3 and 5 years old who need to have an upper baby molar tooth extracted. All children in the study will be healthy (classified as ASA I or II), and their parents must agree to participate.

During the procedure, each child will first receive a topical anesthetic gel to numb the surface. Then, based on random selection, the child will receive local anesthesia using either the SleeperOne® 5 device or the traditional syringe. Pain levels during the injection and during the extraction will be measured using special scales suitable for children. Other factors like how long the anesthesia takes to work and how long it lasts will also be recorded.

This research will help dentists understand whether the SleeperOne® 5 device offers a more comfortable experience for young children compared to the traditional method. The goal is to reduce fear and pain during dental treatments for kids.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This randomized controlled clinical trial is designed to evaluate and compare the pain perception in pediatric patients during maxillary primary molar extraction when local anesthesia is administered using either the SleeperOne® 5 electronic delivery system or the conventional infiltration technique with a standard syringe.

Participants will be healthy children aged 3 to 5 years, classified as ASA I or ASA II, requiring extraction of a maxillary primary molar. After obtaining informed consent from the parent or guardian, eligible participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups using a sealed-envelope technique.

Both groups will receive topical anesthesia prior to local injection. In the control group, local anesthesia will be administered using a traditional 30-gauge dental needle and syringe. In the intervention group, anesthesia will be delivered using the SleeperOne® 5 device, which offers controlled flow and pressure to minimize discomfort.

Pain during injection and during extraction will be evaluated using both subjective and objective pain assessment tools: the Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale (WBFPR) and the Sound, Eye, Motor (SEM) scale. Secondary outcomes will include time of anesthetic onset and duration, as well as any post-operative complications such as soft tissue trauma or ulceration.

All procedures will be performed by the same pediatric dentist to ensure consistency, and the clinical environment will follow standard infection control protocols. This study aims to determine whether the use of a computer-assisted anesthesia system provides superior comfort and patient experience compared to conventional methods in young children undergoing dental extractions.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain Extraction, Tooth

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Conventional Infiltration

Children in this group will receive local anesthesia using the SleeperOne® 5 electronic anesthesia delivery system (Dental Hi-Tec, France). The anesthetic solution used is 3% mepivacaine (Mepecaine-L®, Alexandria Co. for Pharmaceuticals and Chemical Industries, Egypt), administered via the device which controls flow and pressure to minimize discomfort during extraction of maxillary primary molars.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

SleeperOne 5

Intervention Type DEVICE

A computerized local anesthetic delivery system (manufactured by Dental Hi-Tec, France) designed to minimize pain perception in children during dental procedures by controlling the pressure and flow rate of anesthetic injection. It will be used to deliver 3% mepivacaine (Mepecaine-L®, Alexandria Co. for Pharmaceuticals, Egypt) during maxillary primary molar extraction in pediatric patients.

Conventional Infiltration Technique

Children in this group will receive local anesthesia using conventional infiltration via a standard dental syringe with a 30-gauge short needle. The anesthetic used is 3% mepivacaine (Mepecaine-L®, Alexandria Co. for Pharmaceuticals and Chemical Industries, Egypt). Buccal infiltration will be administered prior to extraction of maxillary primary molars.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

(Conventional Infiltration Anesthesia)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Local anesthetic solution (3% mepivacaine with no vasoconstrictor), manufactured by Alexandria Co. for Pharmaceuticals, Egypt. It will be administered using a 30-gauge short dental needle and standard dental syringe for conventional infiltration anesthesia during primary maxillary molar extraction in pediatric patients.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

SleeperOne 5

A computerized local anesthetic delivery system (manufactured by Dental Hi-Tec, France) designed to minimize pain perception in children during dental procedures by controlling the pressure and flow rate of anesthetic injection. It will be used to deliver 3% mepivacaine (Mepecaine-L®, Alexandria Co. for Pharmaceuticals, Egypt) during maxillary primary molar extraction in pediatric patients.

Intervention Type DEVICE

(Conventional Infiltration Anesthesia)

Local anesthetic solution (3% mepivacaine with no vasoconstrictor), manufactured by Alexandria Co. for Pharmaceuticals, Egypt. It will be administered using a 30-gauge short dental needle and standard dental syringe for conventional infiltration anesthesia during primary maxillary molar extraction in pediatric patients.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Children aged 3-5 years old
* Medically fit children classified as ASA physical status I and II
* Parents acceptance to participate in the study (informed consent)
* Pediatric patients having teeth that have been diagnostically confirmed as requiring extraction.

Exclusion Criteria

* Uncooperative children.
* Patients with an allergy to local anesthesia.
* Children in need of treatment under general anesthesia.
Minimum Eligible Age

3 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

5 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Aya Hesham ElSayed Mohamed ElTanahy

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Aya Hesham ElSayed Mohamed ElTanahy

Master's Candidate in Pediatric Dentistry

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Aya Hesham ElTanahy, MSc

Role: CONTACT

201112902348

Study Documents

Access uploaded study-related documents such as protocols, statistical analysis plans, or lay summaries.

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

Study protocol will be uploaded and publicly accessible upon final approval.

View Document

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

https://www.dentalhitec.com/

it introduces the sleeper one 5 anesthetic device

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

8820255

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.