Comparison of Pain Perception in A Group of Pediatric Patients Undergoing Maxillary Primary Molar Extraction Using A Novel Anesthetic Device Versus Traditional Infiltration
NCT ID: NCT07124052
Last Updated: 2025-08-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
2 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-08-18
2026-09-18
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The study will include children between the ages of 3 and 5 years old who need to have an upper baby molar tooth extracted. All children in the study will be healthy (classified as ASA I or II), and their parents must agree to participate.
During the procedure, each child will first receive a topical anesthetic gel to numb the surface. Then, based on random selection, the child will receive local anesthesia using either the SleeperOne® 5 device or the traditional syringe. Pain levels during the injection and during the extraction will be measured using special scales suitable for children. Other factors like how long the anesthesia takes to work and how long it lasts will also be recorded.
This research will help dentists understand whether the SleeperOne® 5 device offers a more comfortable experience for young children compared to the traditional method. The goal is to reduce fear and pain during dental treatments for kids.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Digital vs. Conventional Anesthesia for Primary Tooth Extractions in Pediatric Patients
NCT07087028
Local Anesthesia With Computerized Device for Restorative Procedures in Pediatric Patients
NCT05531435
"Study of Pain Perception Using Computer-Controlled Versus Conventional Local Anaesthesia in Children Undergoing Molar Extraction
NCT07056101
Jet Injectors Versus Conventional Anesthetic Technique in Children
NCT06314984
Pain Control of Needle-free Versus Needle Injected Local Anesthesia for Pulpotomy of Upper Primary Molars in Children
NCT03917121
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Participants will be healthy children aged 3 to 5 years, classified as ASA I or ASA II, requiring extraction of a maxillary primary molar. After obtaining informed consent from the parent or guardian, eligible participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups using a sealed-envelope technique.
Both groups will receive topical anesthesia prior to local injection. In the control group, local anesthesia will be administered using a traditional 30-gauge dental needle and syringe. In the intervention group, anesthesia will be delivered using the SleeperOne® 5 device, which offers controlled flow and pressure to minimize discomfort.
Pain during injection and during extraction will be evaluated using both subjective and objective pain assessment tools: the Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale (WBFPR) and the Sound, Eye, Motor (SEM) scale. Secondary outcomes will include time of anesthetic onset and duration, as well as any post-operative complications such as soft tissue trauma or ulceration.
All procedures will be performed by the same pediatric dentist to ensure consistency, and the clinical environment will follow standard infection control protocols. This study aims to determine whether the use of a computer-assisted anesthesia system provides superior comfort and patient experience compared to conventional methods in young children undergoing dental extractions.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Conventional Infiltration
Children in this group will receive local anesthesia using the SleeperOne® 5 electronic anesthesia delivery system (Dental Hi-Tec, France). The anesthetic solution used is 3% mepivacaine (Mepecaine-L®, Alexandria Co. for Pharmaceuticals and Chemical Industries, Egypt), administered via the device which controls flow and pressure to minimize discomfort during extraction of maxillary primary molars.
SleeperOne 5
A computerized local anesthetic delivery system (manufactured by Dental Hi-Tec, France) designed to minimize pain perception in children during dental procedures by controlling the pressure and flow rate of anesthetic injection. It will be used to deliver 3% mepivacaine (Mepecaine-L®, Alexandria Co. for Pharmaceuticals, Egypt) during maxillary primary molar extraction in pediatric patients.
Conventional Infiltration Technique
Children in this group will receive local anesthesia using conventional infiltration via a standard dental syringe with a 30-gauge short needle. The anesthetic used is 3% mepivacaine (Mepecaine-L®, Alexandria Co. for Pharmaceuticals and Chemical Industries, Egypt). Buccal infiltration will be administered prior to extraction of maxillary primary molars.
(Conventional Infiltration Anesthesia)
Local anesthetic solution (3% mepivacaine with no vasoconstrictor), manufactured by Alexandria Co. for Pharmaceuticals, Egypt. It will be administered using a 30-gauge short dental needle and standard dental syringe for conventional infiltration anesthesia during primary maxillary molar extraction in pediatric patients.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
SleeperOne 5
A computerized local anesthetic delivery system (manufactured by Dental Hi-Tec, France) designed to minimize pain perception in children during dental procedures by controlling the pressure and flow rate of anesthetic injection. It will be used to deliver 3% mepivacaine (Mepecaine-L®, Alexandria Co. for Pharmaceuticals, Egypt) during maxillary primary molar extraction in pediatric patients.
(Conventional Infiltration Anesthesia)
Local anesthetic solution (3% mepivacaine with no vasoconstrictor), manufactured by Alexandria Co. for Pharmaceuticals, Egypt. It will be administered using a 30-gauge short dental needle and standard dental syringe for conventional infiltration anesthesia during primary maxillary molar extraction in pediatric patients.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Medically fit children classified as ASA physical status I and II
* Parents acceptance to participate in the study (informed consent)
* Pediatric patients having teeth that have been diagnostically confirmed as requiring extraction.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with an allergy to local anesthesia.
* Children in need of treatment under general anesthesia.
3 Years
5 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Aya Hesham ElSayed Mohamed ElTanahy
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Aya Hesham ElSayed Mohamed ElTanahy
Master's Candidate in Pediatric Dentistry
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Study Documents
Access uploaded study-related documents such as protocols, statistical analysis plans, or lay summaries.
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Study protocol will be uploaded and publicly accessible upon final approval.
View DocumentRelated Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
it introduces the sleeper one 5 anesthetic device
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
8820255
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.