"Study of Pain Perception Using Computer-Controlled Versus Conventional Local Anaesthesia in Children Undergoing Molar Extraction
NCT ID: NCT07056101
Last Updated: 2025-07-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
76 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-07-01
2025-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Pain Perception in A Group of Pediatric Patients Undergoing Maxillary Primary Molar Extraction Using A Novel Anesthetic Device Versus Traditional Infiltration
NCT07124052
Assessment of Pain and Anxiety During Infiltration Anesthesia Using Dental Anesthesia Injector Versus Conventional Syringe in Pediatric Patients
NCT07101068
Pain Control of Needle-free Versus Needle Injected Local Anesthesia for Pulpotomy of Upper Primary Molars in Children
NCT03917121
Jet Injectors Versus Conventional Anesthetic Technique in Children
NCT06314984
Impact of Local Anesthesia Techniques on Children's Dental Treatment Experience
NCT07106138
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Children aged 6 to 8 years who meet the inclusion criteria will be randomly allocated to one of four groups using a computer-generated randomization sequence. Standardized injection techniques will be applied in all groups. The primary outcome is subjective pain, assessed using the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale. Secondary outcomes include objective behavioral pain assessments using the FLACC scale and physiological responses such as heart rate and oxygen saturation measured with a pulse oximeter.
All procedures will be performed by a single trained operator. The assistant supervisor will monitor randomization and data collection. Although blinding of the operator and participants is not feasible due to the nature of the devices, outcome assessors and the statistician will remain blinded to group assignment to reduce bias.
The study aims to identify whether the GENI device provides improved comfort, reduced pain, and greater cooperation among pediatric patients compared to traditional local anesthesia techniques. The results are expected to guide the development of better pain management strategies in pediatric dentistry.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
GENI High-Speed Injection
Participants in this arm will receive local anesthesia using the GENI computer-controlled local anesthesia delivery (CCLAD) device set to high-speed injection mode. Buccal and intrapapillary infiltration will be administered using 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine. The injection will be performed by the principal investigator following a standardized technique. Pain perception will be evaluated immediately after injection.
GENI High-Speed Injection
The GENI device is a computer-controlled local anesthesia delivery system that automates the injection process using pressure feedback to regulate flow. In this arm, the device is set to high-speed mode to deliver the anesthetic solution at the fastest available flow rate. Buccal and intrapapillary infiltration is performed using 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine. The procedure is carried out by the principal investigator using a standardized technique. Pain perception is assessed following injection to evaluate the impact of delivery speed on patient experience.
GENI Moderate-Speed Injection
Participants in this arm will receive local anesthesia using the GENI computer-controlled local anesthesia delivery (CCLAD) device set to moderate-speed injection mode. The injection will include buccal and intrapapillary infiltration using 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine. The procedure will be performed by the principal investigator using a standardized technique. Pain perception will be assessed immediately following the injection.
GENI Moderate-Speed Injection
The GENI device is a computer-controlled local anesthesia delivery system designed to regulate flow and pressure during injection using real-time feedback. In this arm, the device is set to moderate-speed mode, delivering anesthetic at an intermediate flow rate. Buccal and intrapapillary infiltration is performed using 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine. The injection is administered by the principal investigator using a standardized technique. This group is used to assess the impact of moderate-speed delivery on pain perception and physiological response in pediatric patients.
GENI Low-Speed Injection
Participants in this arm will receive local anesthesia using the GENI computer-controlled local anesthesia delivery (CCLAD) device set to low-speed injection mode. Buccal and intrapapillary infiltration will be administered using 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine. The injection will be performed by the principal investigator following a standardized protocol. Pain perception will be evaluated using subjective, objective, and physiological measures.
GENI Low-Speed Injection
The GENI device is a computer-controlled local anesthesia delivery system that maintains precise control over injection pressure and flow. In this arm, the device is set to low-speed mode, delivering the anesthetic solution at the slowest available rate to minimize tissue pressure and potential discomfort. Buccal and intrapapillary infiltration is administered using 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine. The injection is performed by the principal investigator using a standardized technique. This group evaluates whether low-speed delivery reduces pain perception and improves patient comfort compared to faster injection speeds and conventional methods.
A Conventional dental Syringe
Participants in this arm will receive local anesthesia using a traditional metal aspirating dental syringe (C-K JECT) with a short 30-gauge needle. Buccal and intrapapillary infiltration will be performed using 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine, following a standardized injection technique. The procedure will be conducted by the principal investigator. Pain perception will be assessed immediately after the injection using subjective, objective, and physiological parameters.
A conventional dental syringe
The conventional dental syringe (C-K JECT) is a manual, metal aspirating syringe commonly used for local anesthesia administration in dental procedures. In this study, the device is used to perform buccal and intrapapillary infiltration using 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine. Injections are delivered manually at a standardized rate by the principal investigator. This arm serves as the active comparator to evaluate differences in pain perception between traditional syringe injections and those delivered via a computer-controlled device.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
A conventional dental syringe
The conventional dental syringe (C-K JECT) is a manual, metal aspirating syringe commonly used for local anesthesia administration in dental procedures. In this study, the device is used to perform buccal and intrapapillary infiltration using 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine. Injections are delivered manually at a standardized rate by the principal investigator. This arm serves as the active comparator to evaluate differences in pain perception between traditional syringe injections and those delivered via a computer-controlled device.
GENI High-Speed Injection
The GENI device is a computer-controlled local anesthesia delivery system that automates the injection process using pressure feedback to regulate flow. In this arm, the device is set to high-speed mode to deliver the anesthetic solution at the fastest available flow rate. Buccal and intrapapillary infiltration is performed using 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine. The procedure is carried out by the principal investigator using a standardized technique. Pain perception is assessed following injection to evaluate the impact of delivery speed on patient experience.
GENI Moderate-Speed Injection
The GENI device is a computer-controlled local anesthesia delivery system designed to regulate flow and pressure during injection using real-time feedback. In this arm, the device is set to moderate-speed mode, delivering anesthetic at an intermediate flow rate. Buccal and intrapapillary infiltration is performed using 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine. The injection is administered by the principal investigator using a standardized technique. This group is used to assess the impact of moderate-speed delivery on pain perception and physiological response in pediatric patients.
GENI Low-Speed Injection
The GENI device is a computer-controlled local anesthesia delivery system that maintains precise control over injection pressure and flow. In this arm, the device is set to low-speed mode, delivering the anesthetic solution at the slowest available rate to minimize tissue pressure and potential discomfort. Buccal and intrapapillary infiltration is administered using 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine. The injection is performed by the principal investigator using a standardized technique. This group evaluates whether low-speed delivery reduces pain perception and improves patient comfort compared to faster injection speeds and conventional methods.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Both sexes
* Healthy children classified as ASA I
* Children with maxillary primary molars indicated for extraction
* No previous dental experience
* Mentally capable of communication and following instructions
* No acute dental pain
Exclusion Criteria
* Children with known allergies to the local anesthetic or dental materials used in the study
* Children taking medications (e.g., antibiotics, analgesics) in the previous 48 hours that may alter pain perception
* Children whose parents or legal guardians refuse to sign the informed consent form
* Children experiencing acute dental pain
6 Years
8 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Tarek MHD kher al saka amini
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Tarek MHD kher al saka amini
DOCTOR
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Dr. Mariam mohsen Associate Professor of Pediatric Dentistry and Dental Public
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Cairo University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Cairo University
Cairo, Giza Governorate, Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Official website of the Faculty of Dentistry at Cairo University, providing information about academic programs, research activities, and departmental contacts related to dental studies.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
GENI-CCLAD VS CA
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.