Comparison of Intraosseous Anesthesia Osteocentral With Electronic Assistance to Injection With Conventional Anesthesia

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

110 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-03-24

Study Completion Date

2022-11-24

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Anesthesia systems with electronic injection assistance for slow injection pressure-limiting drips (especially for intraosseous anaesthesia) are offered to limit pain. The European Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (EAPD) recommends them for their pen-like appearance which avoids the negative aspect of the classic syringe (Kühnisch 2017). A review systematic review of the literature (Smolarek et al 2019) including 20 randomized controlled trials conducted at children and adolescents showed a significant reduction in pain with the systems with electronic assistance compared to conventional anaesthesia performed with a syringe (-0.8: IC95% (-1.3, -0.3)). Only four of them (Tahmassebi et al 2009, Kandiah and Tahmassebi 2012, Patini et al 2018, Smail-Faugeron et al 2019) were at low risk of bias, and only two parallel group trials were of poor quality and included only children in temporary dentition in which anaesthesia, often problematic, was performed only in the maxilla (Allen et al 2002, Klein et al, 2005) without assessing the intensity of the pain felt.

(FPS-R).

The tested strategy, anesthesia system with electronic injection assistance (SleeperOne® 5 Dental Hi Tec), compared to a conventional metallic anaesthetic syringe currently considered as the standard for performing local anesthesia during oral treatments painful, meets the ISO 13485: 2016 standard.

Elements justifying that the particular surveillance modalities added by research do not involve negligible risks and constraints

Specific monitoring modalities added by research include :

* Explanation of the study to each eligible child and his or her legal guardians
* Gathering the informed consent of the child and his or her legal guardians
* The determination of comparative anesthesia systems (SleeperOne® 5 versus syringe metal)
* Data collection during the two care sessions (maximum 15 days apart)

It is a use of a product placed on the market whose conditions of use are in conformity with its destination and its current conditions of use (RIPH Category 2 application decree) There is no additional consultation or visit, nor any additional examination, in relation to the management in accordance with the recommendations of good practice of a child affected by a carious disease corresponding to the children included. On the other hand, the consultation will take a little longer due to the indicators to be collected and the data entry. These particular surveillance modalities added by research have only negligible constraints.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Local Anesthesia With Computerized Device for Restorative Procedures in Pediatric Patients

NCT05531435

Dental Pain and Sensation Disorder Dental Caries in Children

COMPLETED NA

Comparison of Pain Perception in A Group of Pediatric Patients Undergoing Maxillary Primary Molar Extraction Using A Novel Anesthetic Device Versus Traditional Infiltration

NCT07124052

Pain Extraction, Tooth

NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA

Jet Injectors Versus Conventional Anesthetic Technique in Children

NCT06314984

Anesthesia

COMPLETED NA

Pain Control of Needle-free Versus Needle Injected Local Anesthesia for Pulpotomy of Upper Primary Molars in Children

NCT03917121

Anesthesia, Local

UNKNOWN NA

Assessment of Pain and Anxiety During Infiltration Anesthesia Using Dental Anesthesia Injector Versus Conventional Syringe in Pediatric Patients

NCT07101068

Dental Caries Reversible Pulpitis

RECRUITING NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

This is a multicentre, randomized, split-mouth, randomized controlled trial in which the experimental and control anesthetic systems will be randomly assigned to the teeth (randomization unit) of the tooth pair. controlerals considered in the same patient. This design allows a gain in power, each subject being its own witness without any carry-across effect, the two treatments being separated by one to two weeks ("split-mouth cross-over").

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

The dental surgeon cannot, of course, be blind to the type of anesthesia. The subject may be kept blind to the type of anesthesia administered. This is the most important since the main criterion of judgment is a criterion reported by the patient (his or her pain during anesthesia). Similarly, the evaluator will be kept blind to the type of anesthesia administered.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

sleeper one

Topical anesthesia: to be applied during 1 to 2 minutes on a previously dried mucous membrane (Lidocaine Gingival Gel, Septodont).

Osteocentral anesthesia performed with the SleeperOne® 5 system (Dental Hi Tec) loaded with Articaine 1/200000 carpule.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

sleeper one

Intervention Type DEVICE

anesthesic injection with sleeper one device

conventional technis

Intervention Type DEVICE

anesthesic injection with the conventional technic

conventional technique

Topical anesthesia: to be applied during 1 to 2 minutes on a previously dried mucous membrane (Lidocaine Gingival Gel, Septodont).

Anaesthesia using a conventional technique, i.e. a metal syringe loaded with Articaine 1/200000 carpule.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

sleeper one

Intervention Type DEVICE

anesthesic injection with sleeper one device

conventional technis

Intervention Type DEVICE

anesthesic injection with the conventional technic

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

sleeper one

anesthesic injection with sleeper one device

Intervention Type DEVICE

conventional technis

anesthesic injection with the conventional technic

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Written consent of one of the two parents (legal guardians) and the child,
* Child and parents (legal guardians) speaking French,
* Child covered by his parents' social security coverage,
* Child aged 4-8 years in temporary stable denture,
* Child in good general health (ASAI or II),
* Child cooperating in care in the vigilant state (cooperation evaluated with a Venham score) 0, 1, 2).
* Child with two temporary molars of the same type, 1st or 2nd molars, controlateral (fractional mouth test) belonging to different quadrants of the the same arch (pair of teeth 54-64, 55-65, 74-84 or 75-85) and each requiring a single equivalent conservative treatment under anaesthesia (ICDAS 3 to 6 carious lesions on teeth) vital).

Exclusion Criteria

They are declined at the scale of the subject and the tooth:

* Child having taken an analgesic treatment 24 hours before randomization,
* Child allergic to local anesthetics
* Child with at least one of the two temporary molars of the same pair (54-64, 55-65, 74-84 or 75-85) has inflammatory or infectious complications (symptomatology of irreversible pulpitis, clear radio image) and in front of this fact to make the object of a pulpectomy or avulsion :
* Molar presenting spontaneous pain outside of meals or continuous pain.
* Temporary molar whose radiographic examination reveals an enlargement of the space desmodontal, the presence of a radio-clear image at the furcation and/or the periapical regions, or even internal or external resorption.

Minimum Eligible Age

4 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

8 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No