Midazolam and Ketamine Effect Administered Through the Nose for Sedation of Children for Dental Treatment

NCT ID: NCT02447289

Last Updated: 2018-04-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

84 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-05-21

Study Completion Date

2016-10-18

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Randomised clinical trial to test the efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of sedatives; masked, controlled, parallel design with three arms, phase 4.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

About 10% of children may have behavioral problems during dental treatment, but the evidence for sedative protocols that benefit the care in pediatric dentistry are still weak. This randomized, masked, controlled, parallel design study aims to evaluate the efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of intranasal sedation with ketamine / midazolam in healthy children aged 2 to 6 years old. Children will be selected among those with dental decay that do not allow dental treatment to be performed, and need at least two restorations under local anesthesia and rubber dam isolation. It is estimated a preliminarily a sample of 84 children equally divided into three groups: A) Ketamine (4.0 mg / kg up to 100 mg) + midazolam (0.2 mg / kg, maximum 5 mg) intranasally; B) ketamine (4.0 mg / kg up to 100 mg) + midazolam (0.5 mg / kg, maximum 20 mg) orally; C) midazolam (1.0 mg / kg, maximum 20 mg) orally. The hypothesis is that ketamine / midazolam combination, administered intranasally, it constitutes an effective sedative regime, safe and cost-effective for use in pediatric dentistry in the public service. The primary endpoint is the behavior of the child. Secondary endpoints are: sedative administration acceptance, procedure memory and salivary cortisol levels within each intervention group. Additionally, we will evaluate: the occurrence of pain and associated changes in facial expressions with potentially painful stimuli in children sedated for dental care; caregivers and paediatric dentists' stress and perception about sedation; adverse events that occur during and after administration of sedatives; cost-effectiveness of the sedative protocols. The experimental design is planned to minimize systematic and random errors and to contribute to higher level of evidence in future systematic reviews. The outcomes of this study have potential impact on public and private health practice, and may support institutional guidelines dealing with this theme.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Child Behavior Dental Caries

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Experimental

Intranasal administration of ketamine (4.0 mg/kg, max. 100 mg) and midazolam (0.2 mg/kg, max. 5 mg)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Intranasal ketamine

Intervention Type DRUG

Ketamine injectable solution in a concentration of 50.0 mg/mL administered into the nose with an atomizer; dose of 4.0 mg/kg, maximum 100.0 mg

Intranasal midazolam

Intervention Type DRUG

Midazolam injectable solution in a concentration of 5.0 mg/mL administered into the nose with an atomizer; dose of 0.2 mg/kg, maximum 5.0 mg

Comparator

Oral administration of ketamine (4.0 mg/kg, max. 100 mg) and midazolam (0.5 mg/kg, max. 20 mg)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Oral ketamine

Intervention Type DRUG

Ketamine injectable solution in a concentration of 50.0 mg/mL via oral route; dose of 4.0 mg/kg maximum 100.0 mg

Oral midazolam

Intervention Type DRUG

Midazolam oral solution in a concentration of 2.0 mg/mL via oral route; dose of 0.5 mg/kg, maximum 5.0 mg when associated with ketamine; dose of 1.0 mg/kg, maximum 20.0 mg when give as a solely agent

Control

Oral administration of midazolam (1.0 mg/kg, max. 20 mg)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Oral midazolam

Intervention Type DRUG

Midazolam oral solution in a concentration of 2.0 mg/mL via oral route; dose of 0.5 mg/kg, maximum 5.0 mg when associated with ketamine; dose of 1.0 mg/kg, maximum 20.0 mg when give as a solely agent

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Intranasal ketamine

Ketamine injectable solution in a concentration of 50.0 mg/mL administered into the nose with an atomizer; dose of 4.0 mg/kg, maximum 100.0 mg

Intervention Type DRUG

Oral ketamine

Ketamine injectable solution in a concentration of 50.0 mg/mL via oral route; dose of 4.0 mg/kg maximum 100.0 mg

Intervention Type DRUG

Intranasal midazolam

Midazolam injectable solution in a concentration of 5.0 mg/mL administered into the nose with an atomizer; dose of 0.2 mg/kg, maximum 5.0 mg

Intervention Type DRUG

Oral midazolam

Midazolam oral solution in a concentration of 2.0 mg/mL via oral route; dose of 0.5 mg/kg, maximum 5.0 mg when associated with ketamine; dose of 1.0 mg/kg, maximum 20.0 mg when give as a solely agent

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Ketamin S, Cristalia, São Paulo, Brazil Ketamin S, Cristalia, São Paulo, Brazil Dormire injectable solution, Cristalia, São Paulo, Brazil Dormire oral solution, Cristalia, São Paulo, Brazil

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* American Society of Anesthesiologists I (healthy) or II (mild and controlled systemic disease such as persistent asthma)
* Small risk of airway obstruction (Mallampati less than 2 or tonsillar hypertrophy occupying less than 50% of the oropharynx)
* No medical history of neurological or cognitive changes
* Absence of facial deformities
* Term birth
* No use of drugs that may impair cognitive functions
* At least two teeth with cavities without pulp involvement, requiring dental restoration under local anesthesia and rubber dam

Exclusion Criteria

* Positive or definitely positive behavior (Frankl et al, 1962) in a dental treatment session conducted by the research team
Minimum Eligible Age

2 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

6 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Universidade Federal de Goias

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Luciane Ribeiro de Rezende Sucasas da Costa

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Luciane R Costa, DDS, MS, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Professor

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Dental School

Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Brazil

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Sado-Filho J, Viana KA, Correa-Faria P, Costa LR, Costa PS. Randomized clinical trial on the efficacy of intranasal or oral ketamine-midazolam combinations compared to oral midazolam for outpatient pediatric sedation. PLoS One. 2019 Mar 11;14(3):e0213074. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213074. eCollection 2019.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30856181 (View on PubMed)

Gomes HS, Miranda AR, Viana KA, Batista AC, Costa PS, Daher A, Machado GC, Sado-Filho J, Vieira LA, Correa-Faria P, Hosey MT, Costa LR. Intranasal sedation using ketamine and midazolam for pediatric dental treatment (NASO): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2017 Apr 11;18(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1919-2.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28399933 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

041530

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.