Effect of a Candy Flavoring Before Local Anesthesia on Anxiety and Pain Perception in Children

NCT ID: NCT05727527

Last Updated: 2024-05-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

84 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-04-01

Study Completion Date

2023-09-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a randomized clinical trial that aimed to test the effect of using sugar-free flavors as a sensory distraction technique during local anesthesia on pain perception when compared to a negative control group. Applying the flavor before injecting local anesthesia helped in distracting the child and reduced the associated pain.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background: Distraction techniques can be very useful in managing children on the dental chair and to guide their attention away from a painful stimulus. No studies so far have used a sugar-free solution as a distraction method.

Aim: To test the effect of using sugar-free flavors as a sensory distraction technique during local anesthesia on pain perception and anxiety when compared to negative control group, using a split-mouth randomized study design.

Methods: A total of 84 children, aged 4-9 years with no previous dental experience and require the same treatment on the upper primary first or second molars bilaterally were included in this study. Each child received two injections. The children were randomly allocated into two groups, group 1 received the first injection after applying a flavor, and group 2 received the first injection after applying sterile water. The children received the first injection either on the right or left side, and switched sides on the next visit, resulting in (n=168) total injections. The observed pain perception was assessed using the SEM scale. Wong-Baker Faces pain rating scale will be used to assess the pain reported by the child. Pulse rate, BMI, and sweet taste preference were also recorded by an independent observer to ensure blinding.

Results: Using a sugar-free candy flavor before injecting local anesthesia helps in reducing pain accompanying local anesthesia.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Local Anesthesia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SEQUENTIAL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Study group

Will initially receive the infiltration injection after applying a candy flavor first, followed by sterile water in the next visit

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Local Anesthesia 1

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Local anesthesia injection after applying a candy flavor

Local Anesthesia 2

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Local anesthesia injection after applying sterile water

Control group

Will initially receive the infiltration injection after applying sterile water first, followed by candy flavor in the next visit

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Local Anesthesia 1

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Local anesthesia injection after applying a candy flavor

Local Anesthesia 2

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Local anesthesia injection after applying sterile water

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Local Anesthesia 1

Local anesthesia injection after applying a candy flavor

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Local Anesthesia 2

Local anesthesia injection after applying sterile water

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Healthy (ASA Grade 1 status) children
* First dental experience for the child including local anesthesia.
* Children with caries lesions that require restorative treatment.
* Children who require the same treatment on upper primary first or second molars bilaterally.

Exclusion Criteria

* Children with poor behavior (unable to cooperate for dental treatment).
* Previous unpleasant dental experience (dental phobia).
* History of abscess, redness, fistula in the injection site (need for extraction).
* Presence of a systemic disease, mental, cognitive and intellectual disabilities.
Minimum Eligible Age

4 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

10 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

King Abdullah University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ola B. Al-Batayneh

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Jordan University of Science and Technology

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ola B. Al-Batayneh

Irbid, , Jordan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Jordan

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Alanazi KJ, Pani S, AlGhanim N. Efficacy of external cold and a vibrating device in reducing discomfort of dental injections in children: A split mouth randomised crossover study. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2019 Apr;20(2):79-84. doi: 10.1007/s40368-018-0399-8. Epub 2018 Dec 5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30519955 (View on PubMed)

Al-Khotani A, Bello LA, Christidis N. Effects of audiovisual distraction on children's behaviour during dental treatment: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Acta Odontol Scand. 2016 Aug;74(6):494-501. doi: 10.1080/00016357.2016.1206211. Epub 2016 Jul 13.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27409593 (View on PubMed)

Asvanund Y, Mitrakul K, Juhong RO, Arunakul M. Effect of audiovisual eyeglasses during local anesthesia injections in 5- to 8-year-old children. Quintessence Int. 2015 Jun;46(6):513-21. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a33932.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25918755 (View on PubMed)

Ghaderi F, Ahmadbeigi M, Vossoughi M, Sardarian A. The efficacy of administrating a sweet-tasting solution for reducing the pain related to dental injections in children: A randomized controlled trial. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2021 Mar;31(2):184-190. doi: 10.1111/ipd.12697. Epub 2020 Aug 25.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32757418 (View on PubMed)

Ghadimi S, Estaki Z, Rahbar P, Shamshiri AR. Effect of visual distraction on children's anxiety during dental treatment: a crossover randomized clinical trial. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2018 Aug;19(4):239-244. doi: 10.1007/s40368-018-0352-x. Epub 2018 Jun 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29949082 (View on PubMed)

Jones CM, Heidmann J, Gerrish AC. Children's ratings of dental injection and treatment pain, and the influence of the time taken to administer the injection. Int J Paediatr Dent. 1995 Jun;5(2):81-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-263x.1995.tb00169.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 7547818 (View on PubMed)

Nuvvula S, Alahari S, Kamatham R, Challa RR. Effect of audiovisual distraction with 3D video glasses on dental anxiety of children experiencing administration of local analgesia: a randomised clinical trial. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2015 Feb;16(1):43-50. doi: 10.1007/s40368-014-0145-9. Epub 2014 Sep 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25256207 (View on PubMed)

Srouji R, Ratnapalan S, Schneeweiss S. Pain in children: assessment and nonpharmacological management. Int J Pediatr. 2010;2010:474838. doi: 10.1155/2010/474838. Epub 2010 Jul 25.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20706640 (View on PubMed)

Pepino YM, Mennella JA. Sucrose-induced analgesia is related to sweet preferences in children but not adults. Pain. 2005 Dec 15;119(1-3):210-218. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2005.09.029. Epub 2005 Nov 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16298489 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

692l2021

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Buffered Local Anesthetic
NCT05757648 COMPLETED PHASE4
Efficacy of a New Topical Anesthetic
NCT00562211 COMPLETED PHASE1/PHASE2