Effectiveness of DentalVibe in Reducing Injection Pain and Anxiety During Local Anaesthesia in Children

NCT ID: NCT03445182

Last Updated: 2021-06-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

41 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-04-01

Study Completion Date

2019-09-10

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study is to determine the effectiveness of DentalVibe (DV) in reducing injection pain and anxiety associated with local anaesthesia in paediatric patients.

The clinical trial is a randomized split-mouth assignment. Included patients are 8-12 years old requiring local anesthetic infiltration with conventional syringe (CS) for extraction of two primary maxillary molars bilaterally. Eligible patients undergo two single-visit treatments after CFSS-DS measurement before each, where as DV is allocated to either first or second local anaesthesia procedure. Primary outcome measure will be pain felt during injection, reported by patient on VAS. Secondary outcome measures: self-reported anxiety during injection on FIS; pain-related behavior according to FLACC scale; heart-rate dynamics; patient preference to local anaesthesia method - CS or CS+DV.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Achieving local anaesthesia in children is one of the critical aspects of pain management.

In recent years, several innovative dental appliances have been developed on the concept to reduce the pain of needle injection by applying pressure, vibration, microoscillations or a combination of them.

Тhe aim of this study is to determine the effectiveness of DentalVibe (DV) in reducing injection pain and anxiety associated with local anaesthesia in paediatric patients.

The clinical trial is a randomized split-mouth assignment. Included patients are healthy positive children 8-12 years old requiring local anesthetic infiltration for extraction of two primary maxillary molars bilaterally.

Eligible patients undergo two single-visit treatments after CFSS-DS measurement of dental fear prior to each. Local anaethetic is delivered through buccal infiltration with conventional syringe, where as DentalVibe Comfort System Injection is allocated to either first or second local anaesthesia procedure. Primary outcome measure will be pain felt during injection, reported by patient on visual analogue scale. Secondary outcome measures: self-reported anxiety during injection on Facial Image Scale; pain-related behavior according to FLACC scale; heart-rate dynamics; patient preference to local anaesthesia method - traditional infiltration or DentalVibe-assisted injection.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain Management Local Anaesthesia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Randomized Intervention Model: Split-mouth assignment
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control group

Local anaesthesia with conventional syringe

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Local anaesthesia with conventional syringe

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Buccal infiltration in posterior maxillary region with traditional technique. A 27 gauge short needle is inserted in the mucobuccal fold above the tooth to be anesthetized.

Local anaesthetic infiltration speed 1ml/min. Drug: Local anaesthetic - Ubistesin - 4% Articaine with adrenaline 1: 200 000 1.7 mL

DentalVibe group

Local anaesthesia with conventional syringe + DentalVibe

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Local anaesthesia with conventional syringe + Dentalvibe

Intervention Type DEVICE

Buccal infiltration in posterior maxillary region. The tip of the DentalVibe device is placed in the mucobuccal fold above the tooth to be anesthetized. The device is activated for 5 s. A 27 gauge short needle is inserted as close as possible to the inner side of the prong while the vibration is still on.

Local anaesthetic infiltration speed 1ml/min. After injection the needle is withdrawn and vibration continues for another 5 s.

Drug: Local anaesthetic - Ubistesin - 4% Articaine with adrenaline 1: 200 000 1.7 mL

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Local anaesthesia with conventional syringe

Buccal infiltration in posterior maxillary region with traditional technique. A 27 gauge short needle is inserted in the mucobuccal fold above the tooth to be anesthetized.

Local anaesthetic infiltration speed 1ml/min. Drug: Local anaesthetic - Ubistesin - 4% Articaine with adrenaline 1: 200 000 1.7 mL

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Local anaesthesia with conventional syringe + Dentalvibe

Buccal infiltration in posterior maxillary region. The tip of the DentalVibe device is placed in the mucobuccal fold above the tooth to be anesthetized. The device is activated for 5 s. A 27 gauge short needle is inserted as close as possible to the inner side of the prong while the vibration is still on.

Local anaesthetic infiltration speed 1ml/min. After injection the needle is withdrawn and vibration continues for another 5 s.

Drug: Local anaesthetic - Ubistesin - 4% Articaine with adrenaline 1: 200 000 1.7 mL

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients, identified as positive or definitely positive through Frankl behavioral rating scale.
* Children, requiring local anaesthesia infiltration for extraction of two primary upper jaw molars bilaterally.
* Indications for extraction of primary molars: over-retention - in case of delayed physiological change and tendency of eruption of the permanent tooth; orthodontic reasons - tooth removed to prevent or correct malocclusion; advanced root resorption and imminent physiological tooth replacement; teeth with a severely damaged clinical crown (from trauma or caries and its complications); teeth with failed pulpotomy, acute or chronic diffuse periodontitis, endangering the germ of the permanent tooth.
* Obtained informed consent from parents or gave-givers to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria

* Children who are considered medically compromised or medically complex patients. The absence of disease is confirmed by anamnestic interview with a parent or a care-giver of the child and excludes general acute or chronic disease, cognitive impairment, psychogenic nonepileptic events.
* Patients who are undergoing therapy with neurological, sedative, analgesic and/or anti-inflammatory drugs 7 days prior to treatment.
* Patients with allergy to local anesthetics of the amide group.
* Children, who are first time ever dental patients.
Minimum Eligible Age

8 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

12 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Plovdiv Medical University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ani Beltcheva

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Medical University - Plovdiv, Bulgaria

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Faculty of Dental Medicine, Medical University - Plovdiv

Plovdiv, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Bulgaria

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Veneva E, Cholakova R, Raycheva R, Belcheva A. Efficacy of vibrotactile device DentalVibe in reducing injection pain and anxiety during local anaesthesia in paediatric dental patients: a study protocol for a randomised controlled clinical trial. BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 2;9(7):e029460. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029460.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31270121 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PlovdivMU1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.