Identifying Decision Making Parameters in Healthy Volunteers and Anxiety Patients
NCT ID: NCT05092971
Last Updated: 2024-05-22
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
51 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-03-03
2022-07-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Research has shown that anxiety affects more than feelings. It also affects behavior. Researchers want to learn how the brain and body respond to unexpected threats. They want to see if probable pleasant or unpleasant events change decisions.
Objective:
To better understand how changes in anxiety are associated with changes in decision-making.
Eligibility:
Adults aged 18-50 with generalized anxiety disorder, seasonal affective disorder, or panic disorder. Healthy volunteers are also needed.
Design:
Participants will be screened under protocol #01-M-0254.
Participants will complete surveys about their anxiety, risk-taking, and curiosity.
Participants will complete a computer task. They will be given different choices. They will make a choice. They will receive an unpleasant or pleasant stimulus based on their choice. They will repeat this task many times.
Most participants will do the task in the clinic. The unpleasant stimulus will be electric shock and acoustic startle. They will receive electric shocks through electrodes placed on their arm or fingers. They may hear loud noises through headphones. Their eyeblinks will be recorded with electrodes placed under their eye. Their heart rate and skin conductance activity will be collected with electrodes as well.
Some healthy volunteers will do the task during a functional magnetic resonance imaging scan. They will lie on a table that slides in and out of a scanner. A coil will be placed over their head. The unpleasant stimulus will be electric shock, given as stated above. The scanner will record their brain activity. Their breathing and pulse rate will be recorded as well.
Participation will last for 3-4 hours.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Expectation of Unpleasant Events in Anxiety Disorders
NCT00055224
Electrical Vestibular Stimulation (VeNS), Compared to a Sham Control For The Management Of Anxiety
NCT05907967
Neural Functioning Underlying Anxiety and Its Treatment (The INSULA Study)
NCT00947570
Intracranial Neurophysiological Signatures of Fear and Anxiety in Humans
NCT05120635
Generalized Anxiety Disorder and Social Anxiety Disorder: Their Impact on the Processing of Information and Learning
NCT00062517
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This study s goal is to identify parameters of interest in decision making in the context of anxiety disorders, using theoretical models in healthy volunteers (HV) and anxiety patients (AD). Participants are asked to complete a decision-making task, namely the Multi-armed Bandit Task.
The study will be conducted in the clinic. Participants (HV and AD) are asked to fill out questionnaires and complete the Multi-armed Bandit Task. An electric shock is used as the aversive stimulus. Monetary reward is used as the reward stimulus. Additionally, physiological signals (Heart rate, skin conductance activity, startle) are collected during the course of the task. In addition, in a pilot study, participants startle responses for varying shock parameters are recorded and analyzed.
Objectives:
The primary objective of this study is to use theoretical models in healthy volunteers (HV) and patients with an anxiety disorder (AD) to better understand how changes in anxiety are associated with changes in decision making. In addition, this study will ascertain whether decision making parameters correlate with certain behavioral measures such as trait and state anxiety using (i) questionnaires, (ii) physiological measures.
Endpoints:
The primary endpoint of this study is a significant difference in model derived parameters between experimental manipulations (conditions) and/or population groups. The parameters of interest include: 1) Learning Rate, 2) Exploration parameter, 3) Discount rate, 4) Loss aversion, 5) Inverse Temperature.
The secondary endpoints are a significant correlation between functions of model derived parameters and behavioral and/or physiological measures of anxiety including:
1. Questionnaire scores
2. Startle
3. Skin conductance
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
BASIC_SCIENCE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Anxiety patient
Participants with anxiety completed computer tasks. They were given different choices and had to make choice(s). The objective was to find the optimal choice by sampling through the choices. They received an unpleasant or pleasant stimulus based on their choice(s). They repeated these tasks many times.
Shock or startle device
Shock and startle devices were used as aversive stimulus (shock and startle)
Healthy volunteer
Healthy volunteers completed computer tasks. They were given different choices and had to make choice(s). The objective was to find the optimal choice by sampling through the choices. They received an unpleasant or pleasant stimulus based on their choice(s). They repeated these tasks many times.
Shock or startle device
Shock and startle devices were used as aversive stimulus (shock and startle)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Shock or startle device
Shock and startle devices were used as aversive stimulus (shock and startle)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
1. Provision of signed and dated informed consent form
2. Male or female, aged 18-50, inclusive
3. Patients only: Primary Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) 5 diagnoses of an anxiety disorder (GAD, social anxiety disorder (SAD), panic disorder)
Exclusion Criteria
1. Non-English speaking individual
2. Pregnancy or positive pregnancy test
3. Any significant medical or neurological problems as determined by investigators (e.g.cardiovascular illness, respiratory illness, neurological illness, seizure, etc.)
4. Current or past serious mental disorders (e.g., bipolar or psychotic disorders) (except for anxiety and depressive disorders in patients)
5. Current alcohol or substance use disorder
6. History of moderate or severe alcohol or substance use disorder within one year prior to screening
7. Current or past significant organic central nervous system disorders as determined by investigators, including but not limited to seizure disorder or neurological symptoms of the wrist and arm (e.g., carpal tunnel syndrome) for shocks to be delivered on affected arm.
8. Positive urine toxicology screen at screening visit under 01-M-0254
9. Employees of National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) or an immediate family member of a NIMH employee.
10. Healthy volunteers only: Current DSM-5 disorders.
18 Years
50 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
NIH
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Maryland Pao, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
National Institutes of Health Clinical Center
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
NIH Clinical Center Detailed Web Page
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
000378-M
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
10000378
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.