Mechanisms of Treatment Change in Panic Disorder and Agoraphobia

NCT ID: NCT03547180

Last Updated: 2020-05-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

41 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2004-01-31

Study Completion Date

2008-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary goal of the present study is to identify mechanisms of therapeutic change of two theoretically contrasting therapeutic procedures: The first phase consists of comparing the outcome of the capnometry-assisted breathing therapy (BRT) with cognitive restructuring (CT). During the second phase participants of both interventions will undergo in-vivo exposure.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The primary goal of the present study is to identify mechanisms of therapeutic change of two theoretically contrasting therapeutic procedures: While the rationale of breathing training is based on the assumption that hypocapnea (lower than normal levels of pCO2) is responsible for the development and maintenance of panic disorder, the rationale of cognitive interventions is that the primary mechanism in PD is the cognitive misinterpretation of benign bodily sensations. Further, while breathing training should induce a low-anxiety state (through parasympathetic activation) and, therefore, facilitate habituation to fearful situations, voluntary increases in arousal through hyperventilation (sympathetic activation) has been suggested to facilitate cognitive restructuring during exposure.

In order to study mechanisms that potentially produce clinical improvement, the investigators propose a 2-phase therapeutic intervention: The first phase consists of comparing the outcome of the capnometry-assisted respiratory training (CART) with cognitive restructuring (CT). During the second phase participants of both interventions will undergo in-vivo exposure therapy.

With the data collected from the study, the investigators will test the following hypotheses: (a) CART will produce more reduction in psycho-physiologically relevant measures of panic symptoms compared to CT, while cognitive restructuring will produce more reduction in cognitive parameters of panic symptoms; (b) CART will influence the response to voluntary hyperventilation tests by leading to faster recovery compared to CT. Improvement in respiratory psychophysiology will be correlated with improvement in panic symptom severity; (c) Breathing techniques during exposure will lead to a lower-anxiety state, facilitating but not inhibiting fear extinction as suggested by the safety aid theory

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Panic Disorder With Agoraphobia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Cognitive Therapy

The training included four components: (a) educating patients about exacerbating panic symptoms through catastrophic thoughts (vicious cycle), (b) identifying negative cognitions associated with physical sensation triggers of recent panic attacks, (c) practicing replacement of maladaptive cognitions with non catastrophic explanations, and (d) instructing patients in between session exercises during Phase I.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Cognitive Therapy

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The training included four components: (a) educating patients about exacerbating panic symptoms through catastrophic thoughts (vicious cycle), (b) identifying negative cognitions associated with physical sensation triggers of recent panic attacks, (c) practicing replacement of maladaptive cognitions with non catastrophic explanations, and (d) instructing patients in between session exercises during Phase I.

Capnometry-Assisted Respiratory Training

The training included four components: (a) educating patients about the exacerbation of panic symptoms through hypocapnia; (b) directing patients' attention to potentially detrimental respiratory patterns; (c) teaching patients techniques to control their respiration, in particular end-tidal PCO2; and (d) instructing patients in between-session exercises. Between-session exercises using a portable capnometer were to be performed twice a day for 17 min at home or elsewhere during Phase I.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Capnometry-Assisted Respiratory Training

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The training included four components: (a) educating patients about the exacerbation of panic symptoms through hypocapnia; (b) directing patients' attention to potentially detrimental respiratory patterns; (c) teaching patients techniques to control their respiration, in particular end-tidal PCO2; and (d) instructing patients in between-session exercises. Between-session exercises using a portable capnometer were to be performed twice a day for 17 min at home or elsewhere during Phase I.

In-vivo exposure therapy

In this two-phase intervention, patients were randomized (within each site) to first receive five individual, weekly, 1-hr sessions of respiratory skill training (CART) or cognitive skill training (CT; Phase I, Skill Acquisition Training), followed by three weekly sessions of in-vivo exposure (Phase II, Application Training) plus a fourth session at 2-month follow-up.

Group Type OTHER

In-vivo exposure

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

In this two-phase intervention, patients were randomized (within each site) to first receive five individual, weekly, 1-hr sessions of respiratory skill training (CART) or cognitive skill training (CT; Phase I, Skill Acquisition Training), followed by three weekly sessions of in-vivo exposure (Phase II, Application Training) plus a fourth session at 2-month follow-up.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Cognitive Therapy

The training included four components: (a) educating patients about exacerbating panic symptoms through catastrophic thoughts (vicious cycle), (b) identifying negative cognitions associated with physical sensation triggers of recent panic attacks, (c) practicing replacement of maladaptive cognitions with non catastrophic explanations, and (d) instructing patients in between session exercises during Phase I.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Capnometry-Assisted Respiratory Training

The training included four components: (a) educating patients about the exacerbation of panic symptoms through hypocapnia; (b) directing patients' attention to potentially detrimental respiratory patterns; (c) teaching patients techniques to control their respiration, in particular end-tidal PCO2; and (d) instructing patients in between-session exercises. Between-session exercises using a portable capnometer were to be performed twice a day for 17 min at home or elsewhere during Phase I.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

In-vivo exposure

In this two-phase intervention, patients were randomized (within each site) to first receive five individual, weekly, 1-hr sessions of respiratory skill training (CART) or cognitive skill training (CT; Phase I, Skill Acquisition Training), followed by three weekly sessions of in-vivo exposure (Phase II, Application Training) plus a fourth session at 2-month follow-up.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

CT CART EXP

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* A current DSM-IV diagnosis of panic disorder with agoraphobia that is designated by the patient as the most important source of current distress
* Patients must be willing to engage in exposure to fearful situations and sensations

Exclusion Criteria

* A history of bipolar disorder, psychosis or delusional disorders, current substance abuse or dependence

Medical Exclusion Factors:

* Patients with severe unstable medical illness, or serious medical illness for which hospitalization may be likely within the next three months
* Patients with a history of seizures, angina, myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, clinically significant arrhythmias, transient ischemic attacks, cerebrovascular accidents, diabetes mellitus, significant asthma, emphysema, or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Boston University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Michigan

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Southern Methodist University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Heather McClary

Director of Research Compliance

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Alicia E Meuret, Ph.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Southern Methodist University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Southern Methodist University, Department of Psychology

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Meuret AE, Seidel A, Rosenfield B, Hofmann SG, Rosenfield D. Does fear reactivity during exposure predict panic symptom reduction? J Consult Clin Psychol. 2012 Oct;80(5):773-85. doi: 10.1037/a0028032. Epub 2012 Apr 9.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 22486408 (View on PubMed)

Meuret AE, Rosenfield D, Seidel A, Bhaskara L, Hofmann SG. Respiratory and cognitive mediators of treatment change in panic disorder: evidence for intervention specificity. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2010 Oct;78(5):691-704. doi: 10.1037/a0019552.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 20873904 (View on PubMed)

Meuret AE, Hofmann SG, Rosenfield D. Catastrophic Appraisal and Perceived Control as Moderators of Treatment Response in Panic Disorder. Int J Cogn Ther. 2010 Sep 1;3:262-277. doi: 10.1521/ijct.2010.3.3.262.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21088704 (View on PubMed)

Meuret AE, Trueba AF, Abelson JL, Liberzon I, Auchus R, Bhaskara L, Ritz T, Rosenfield D. High cortisol awakening response and cortisol levels moderate exposure-based psychotherapy success. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2015 Jan;51:331-40. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2014.10.008. Epub 2014 Oct 16.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 25462905 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MEUA-2005

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Treatment of Hypochondriasis With CBT and/or SSRI
NCT00339079 COMPLETED PHASE1/PHASE2