Evaluation of Different Teaching- and Learningmethods

NCT ID: NCT05066204

Last Updated: 2022-04-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-05-17

Study Completion Date

2022-03-29

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Due to the corona pandemia and the consecutive reduction of teaching students face to face the imparting of medical skills is limited. Video sequences may be an adequate alternative to educate selected practical skills. The investigators explored this aspect in spring 2021 concerning the humeral intraosseous access. This study was registered under ClinicalTrials: NCT04842357. Data is still under statistical analysis and not published yet. As a secondary endpoint we found participant having done self-study first and watched a teaching-video one week later performed better than participant in the vice versa sequence. This may have important curricular implications. So, we launch the present study to investigate, if the sequence: Self-Study, then Teaching-Video is more efficient than vice versa.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The investigators will recruit last year medical students and randomise them into two groups: Group A and Group B. Group A will watch a standardised video about the skill, then directly do self-study. Group B will do self-study and then directly watch a standardised video. Right after this, both groups will be video recorded during the performance of the skill: humeral intraosseous access on a simulator. The performance will be quantified by a scale by two investigators

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Complication of Infusion Education, Medical

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Two unbound samples running through a different sequence of teching-/learningmethods
Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Investigators
Investigator are blinded/masked against the study arm of the particular assessed participant.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Sequence: self-study, then teaching video

Participants first do self-study, then right afterwards watch a teaching video, then become tested on a simulator and are videorecorded for evaluation

Group Type OTHER

Sequence of teaching-/learningmethod

Intervention Type OTHER

see: arm/group descriptions

Sequence: teaching video, then self study

Participants first watch a teaching video, then do self-study, then become tested on a simulator and are videorecorded for evaluation

Group Type OTHER

Sequence of teaching-/learningmethod

Intervention Type OTHER

see: arm/group descriptions

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Sequence of teaching-/learningmethod

see: arm/group descriptions

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* voluteer medical students in their last year of medical school (i.e. after 2nd state board in Germany)
* writen informed consert

Exclusion Criteria

* denial of participation
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Thomas Ott

Thomas Ott, M.D., DESA, Scientific consultant of the simulation center, Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Center

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Hospital Centre Mainz

Mainz, RLP, Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Ott T, Demare T, Mohrke J, Silber S, Schwab J, Reuter L, Westhphal R, Schmidtmann I, Dietz SO, Pirlich N, Ziebart A, Engelhard K. Does an instructional video as a stand-alone tool promote the acquisition of practical clinical skills? A randomised simulation research trial of skills acquisition and short-term retention. BMC Med Educ. 2024 Jul 2;24(1):714. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05714-6.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38956562 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2021-16112 EK RLP

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.