Preanesthetic Analgesia/Nociception Index (ANI) and Propofol Injection Pain

NCT ID: NCT05049577

Last Updated: 2023-10-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

124 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-04-01

Study Completion Date

2023-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Recently, Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) has been evaluated for objectively measuring peri-operative pain and to guide intra-operative opioid administration during various surgeries.

Propofol injection pain (PIP) is a common problem and can be very distressing to the patient.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study aimed to the association of preanesthetic ANI scores and PIP in patients who scheduled for general anesthesia.

Before propofol administration in remifentanil group, preanesthetic ANI values (instant and mean) were checked after remifentanil to a target Ce of 4 ng/ml.

Control group received the same volume of saline as remifentanil group. Heart rate and bispectral index were checked as ANI. Point biserial correlation and ROC curve were analyzed.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain, Acute Analgesia Nociceptive Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Prospective randomized and controlled study
Primary Study Purpose

SCREENING

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors
All study drugs were administered using a Minto pharmacokinetic model in a TCI device (Orchestra, Fresenius-Vial, France). The infusion pump was covered to blind the patients, investigator, and outcomes assessor

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control group

To maintain blinding, in the control group, the remifentanil infusion was replaced with 50 ml of normal saline in 50 ml syringe. The remifentanil (or saline) infusion was run until the pump indicated the target Ce had been achieved. Pharmacokinetic model for remifentanil was the Minto model (Height, Weight, and Age) Anesthesia in all patients was induced using 2 mg/kg of 2% propofol. The attending anesthesiologist asked the patients how they felt pain to evaluate pain severity of PIP while half -dose of propofol was administered. After the rest of the propofol was administered, the attending anesthesiologists asked the same question.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Analgesia/Nociception Index (ANI)

Intervention Type DEVICE

V1 and V5 electrocardiographic positions as per the manufacturer's recommendations. The ANI was continuously recorded and displayed with a frequency of 1 Hz. ANI scores measured immediately before propofol administration, half-dose administration (1mg/kg), and full-dose administration (2mg/kg)of propofol.

Remifentanil group

Remifentanil 1 mg was diluted into 50 ml of normal saline. A commercial TCI pump (Orchestra Base Primea, Fresenius Vial, France) was used for the effect-site TCI of remifentanil. The study groups received remifentanil to a target Ce of 4 ng/ ml. Pharmacokinetic model for remifentanil was the Minto model (Height, Weight, and Age) Anesthesia induction and the evaluation of pain were same as control group

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Analgesia/Nociception Index (ANI)

Intervention Type DEVICE

V1 and V5 electrocardiographic positions as per the manufacturer's recommendations. The ANI was continuously recorded and displayed with a frequency of 1 Hz. ANI scores measured immediately before propofol administration, half-dose administration (1mg/kg), and full-dose administration (2mg/kg)of propofol.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Analgesia/Nociception Index (ANI)

V1 and V5 electrocardiographic positions as per the manufacturer's recommendations. The ANI was continuously recorded and displayed with a frequency of 1 Hz. ANI scores measured immediately before propofol administration, half-dose administration (1mg/kg), and full-dose administration (2mg/kg)of propofol.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

ANI MOC-9

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male patients who scheduled for general anesthesia
* Cognitive patients who could understand this study

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients receiving β-receptor blockers, ketamine, clonidine, or any vasoactive substance (i.e. metaraminol, ephedrine) and patients receiving neostigmine, atropine or glycopyrrolate.
Minimum Eligible Age

19 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Wonkwang University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Cheol Lee,MD,PhD,

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Cheol Lee, M.D,Ph.D

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Department of anesthesiology and pain medicine

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

WonwangUH

Iksan, Jeollabuk-do, South Korea

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

South Korea

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Chanques G, Tarri T, Ride A, Prades A, De Jong A, Carr J, Molinari N, Jaber S. Analgesia nociception index for the assessment of pain in critically ill patients: a diagnostic accuracy study. Br J Anaesth. 2017 Oct 1;119(4):812-820. doi: 10.1093/bja/aex210.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29121287 (View on PubMed)

Ledowski T. Objective monitoring of nociception: a review of current commercial solutions. Br J Anaesth. 2019 Aug;123(2):e312-e321. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.03.024. Epub 2019 Apr 30.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31047645 (View on PubMed)

Abdullayev R, Yildirim E, Celik B, Topcu Sarica L. Analgesia Nociception Index: Heart Rate Variability Analysis of Emotional Status. Cureus. 2019 Apr 2;11(4):e4365. doi: 10.7759/cureus.4365.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31192070 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

WonkwangUH8

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.