Applicability of Fluid Responsiveness Indices in Circulatory Failure (AFRIC Study) Study Project

NCT ID: NCT05046340

Last Updated: 2023-02-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

200 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-01-10

Study Completion Date

2023-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Fluid administration is one of the main strategies for patients with acute circulatory failure. However, about half of the patients could not benefit from the fluid administration after the ICU admission. Thus predict the effect of fluid responsiveness is essential. There are sevral indices or tests can be used, such as pulse pressure variation (PPV), end-expiratory occulsion test (EEOT), passive leg raising (PLR), etc. Question of the prevalence of cases in which the different predictive indices of fluid responsiveness in intensive care unit (ICU) are not applicable.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Fluid administration is one of the first-line therapies for most patients with acute circulatory failure. And it was supposed to increase cardiac preload and thus output significantly. However, it only has this effect if cardiac output is dependent on cardiac preload, that is if both ventricles work on the ascending part of the Frank-Starling curve. Our group had already shown that, in half of the critically ill patients admitted in ICU, fluid administration is likely to exert only deleterious effects without any hemodynamic benefit. To predict whether it will exert beneficial effects or not before administering the fluid therapy, a "dynamic approach" has been developed. It consists of observing the effects of changes of preload induced by various tests on cardiac output. 1) Pulse pressure variation: mechanical ventilation induces cyclical changes in cyclical changes in cardiac preload and right ventricular afterload due to cardiopulmonary interactions. If both ventricles are in a preload-dependent state, these variations will induce a cyclical variation in stroke volume. The latter being physiologically related to the pulsed arterial pressure (systolic - diastolic), the respiratory variation of the pulsed arterial pressure (PPV) indicates the existence of a preload-dependence of the two ventricles. 2) The End-expiratory occlusion test (EEOT): this is another method that takes advantage of heart-lung interactions to predict fluid responsiveness in ventilated patients. During mechanical ventilation, each insufflation increases intrathoracic pressure, which hinders systemic venous return. Thus, interrupting the respiratory cycle at the end of expiration inhibits this cyclic hindrance to venous return, increases cardiac preload and cardiac output if both ventricles are preload dependent. The duration of the EEOT must be at least 15 seconds. 3): Passive leg raising (PLR): when a patient is in a recumbent position, the elevation of the lower extremities and the horizontalization of the trunk passively transfers a significant volume of blood from the lower part of the body to the heart chambers and mimics volume expansion.

Numerous studies have reported that the increased cardiac output induced by PLR predicts fluid responsiveness. There is always the question of the prevalence of cases in which the different predictive indices of fluid responsiveness are not applicable and data on this issue are scarce, incomplete, and unsatisfactory.

Few studies have systematically investigated the number of patients in whom PPV cannot be used in the ICU settings. Some studies have reported a very low prevalence of cases where PPV was usable but they included the entire ICU population on a given day, including many patients who did not have an acute circulatory failure, which had no sense since PPV is only used in patients in whom the question of fluid therapy arises. Other studies have reported a higher prevalence of cases where PPV is usable, but they have only looked at the first 24 hours of hospitalization or have focused on patients with an unstable hemodynamic event. Finally, no study has ever studied the prevalence of cases where the respiratory variation of the PLR, or the EEOT are not applicable.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Shock Acute Circulatory Failure

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Passive leg raising

We perform the PLR test by adjusting the bed and not by manually raising the patient's legs. Bronchial secretions must be carefully aspirated before PLR. If awake, the patient should be informed of what the test involves. And measure the cardiac output by using certain devices at the bedside. The end-expiratory occlusion consists in interrupting the ventilator at end-expiration for 15-30 s and assessing the resulting changes in cardiac output.

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

end-expiratory occulsion test

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age ≥ 18
2. The presence of acute circulatory insufficiency defined by the following pragmatic criteria:

* Prior administration of at least 1000 mL of crystalloid or colloid solute during a volemic expansion in the previous 12 hours
* Norepinephrine administration/lactate ≥ 1.5 mmol/L

Exclusion Criteria

* No strict exclusion criterion only if the refusal of the patient.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Bicetre Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Rui Shi, MD, PhD

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Medical Intensive Care Unit

Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, , France

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Rui SHI, M.D.

Role: CONTACT

0642170297

Xavier MONNET, M.D.,Ph.D.

Role: CONTACT

06 60 86 26 69

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Xavier Monnet, MD, PhD

Role: primary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Benes J, Kirov M, Kuzkov V, Lainscak M, Molnar Z, Voga G, Monnet X. Fluid Therapy: Double-Edged Sword during Critical Care? Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:729075. doi: 10.1155/2015/729075. Epub 2015 Dec 22.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26798642 (View on PubMed)

Michard F, Teboul JL. Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients: a critical analysis of the evidence. Chest. 2002 Jun;121(6):2000-8. doi: 10.1378/chest.121.6.2000.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12065368 (View on PubMed)

Michard F, Boussat S, Chemla D, Anguel N, Mercat A, Lecarpentier Y, Richard C, Pinsky MR, Teboul JL. Relation between respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure and fluid responsiveness in septic patients with acute circulatory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000 Jul;162(1):134-8. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.162.1.9903035.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10903232 (View on PubMed)

Marik PE, Cavallazzi R, Vasu T, Hirani A. Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review of the literature. Crit Care Med. 2009 Sep;37(9):2642-7. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181a590da.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19602972 (View on PubMed)

Heenen S, De Backer D, Vincent JL. How can the response to volume expansion in patients with spontaneous respiratory movements be predicted? Crit Care. 2006;10(4):R102. doi: 10.1186/cc4970.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16846530 (View on PubMed)

Soubrier S, Saulnier F, Hubert H, Delour P, Lenci H, Onimus T, Nseir S, Durocher A. Can dynamic indicators help the prediction of fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing critically ill patients? Intensive Care Med. 2007 Jul;33(7):1117-1124. doi: 10.1007/s00134-007-0644-9. Epub 2007 May 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17508201 (View on PubMed)

Muller L, Louart G, Bousquet PJ, Candela D, Zoric L, de La Coussaye JE, Jaber S, Lefrant JY. The influence of the airway driving pressure on pulsed pressure variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness. Intensive Care Med. 2010 Mar;36(3):496-503. doi: 10.1007/s00134-009-1686-y. Epub 2009 Oct 22.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19847400 (View on PubMed)

Malbrain ML, Reuter DA. Assessing fluid responsiveness with the passive leg raising maneuver in patients with increased intra-abdominal pressure: be aware that not all blood returns! Crit Care Med. 2010 Sep;38(9):1912-5. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181f1b6a2. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20724891 (View on PubMed)

Delannoy B, Wallet F, Maucort-Boulch D, Page M, Kaaki M, Schoeffler M, Alexander B, Desebbe O. Applicability of Pulse Pressure Variation during Unstable Hemodynamic Events in the Intensive Care Unit: A Five-Day Prospective Multicenter Study. Crit Care Res Pract. 2016;2016:7162190. doi: 10.1155/2016/7162190. Epub 2016 Mar 31.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27127648 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2017-A03580-53

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.